Thank you, Anna!
23.05.2025 21:30
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Thank you, Anna!
Thanks, Jorge!
Many thanks to @mokuhn.bsky.social , Pavel Brendler, @christian-bayer.bsky.social , and to everyone who supported me during the PhD and on the job market!
I am happy to announce that I have submitted my dissertation last week. Also, I am excited to join De Nederlandsche Bank as a Climate Research Economist in September 🚀
Many thanks to @mokuhn.bsky.social , Pavel Brendler, @christian-bayer.bsky.social, and to everyone who supported me during the PhD and on the job market!
Congratulations, Manuel!
Thanks again to the organizers of the Virtual Seminar on Climate Economics for the opportunity to present my joint work with @lennschlatt.bsky.social
"The Distributional Consequences of Climate Policies"
If you missed the presentation, you can now watch it here
www.frbsf.org/news-and-med...
Cluster member @lennschlatt.bsky.social from the University of Bonn is on the #econjobmarket! Check out his #JMP "Spatial Redistribution of Carbon Taxes" and find his thread on the paper below 👇 (1/9) #EconSky @mokuhn.bsky.social @christian-bayer.bsky.social
The #econjobmarket 2024/2025 is on! We will introduce our @econtribute.bsky.social Job Market candidates and their research in the next days. You can already get to know them here ➡️ econtribute.de/job-market-c.... @dfgpublic.bsky.social #EconSky
A huge thank you to my advisors and everyone who supported me along the way! @mokuhn.bsky.social, Pavel Brendler, Christian Bayer @econtribute.bsky.social (8/8)
Finally, carbon taxes have sizeable general equilibrium effects on housing prices, increasing those of non-emitting houses by 5 percent, while decreasing those of carbon emitting houses by the same amount. (7/8)
This has important implications for the political support for these policies, as place-based transfers allow to set a higher carbon tax under the constraint that the policy is beneficial to a majority of households in both regions. (6/8)
In contrast, place-based transfers avoid this spatial redistribution without reducing the speed of the transition to clean technologies. (5/8)
I find that recycling carbon tax revenues as lump-sum transfers redistributes from rural to urban households. For a carbon tax of 300 Euros per ton, the difference in the present value of net transfers is 8,000 Euros. (4/8)
Second, it builds a quantitative spatial general equilibrium model to evaluate different policies of recycling carbon tax revenues in terms of their redistributive effects and their political support along the transition to clean technologies. (3/8)
First, it empirically identifies the spatial dimension between rural and urban households as important, because the average annual carbon footprint of rural households in Germany is 2.2 tons higher than that of urban households, around 12 percent of the average carbon footprint.
My JMP makes two contributions to the discussion on the distributional consequences of carbon taxes. (1/8)
🚀 I am excited to be on the academic job market!
In my JMP, I study the distributional consequences of carbon taxes for rural and urban households.
For more information, check out the paper: lennardschlattmann.github.io/papers/schla...
and my website: lennardschlattmann.github.io
JMP thread 👇
Today at the CRC 224 retreat, I will present new work w/ @lennschlatt.bsky.social on the "Distributional Consequences of Climate Policies"
I am looking forward to the feedback from my colleagues & students from Mannheim and Bonn
@danyalbayaz.bsky.social @bmuv.de @wolfgangschmidt.bsky.social