me when Iβm in a competition for the most terrible, batshit, utterly insane and completely pathetic rolling stock strategy and my opponent is First/MTR South Western Railway
@agent605
hey look Iβm on the better twitter 21 year old depressed and very queer engineering student and train guy. reputation stan. bi/pan π³οΈβπ (taken). can be suggestive. he/him. definitely not @neroderg.bsky.social >:3cπ My carrd: https://agent605.carrd.c
me when Iβm in a competition for the most terrible, batshit, utterly insane and completely pathetic rolling stock strategy and my opponent is First/MTR South Western Railway
(No I donβt normally use Grindr myself I just created a blank profile purely for the silliness, with help from my boyfriend)
Did an experiment today:
Went to the NEC (where Reform UK were holding their party conference) and opened Grindr.
There was a suspiciously large number of 40+ year old βdown lowβ men as well as young male bottoms who specified βno transβ in their bio.
Curiousβ¦
Death of Stalin scene, Michael palins character saying "Stalin would be loving this"
"The regime is experiencing Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly"
I feel like itβs the case most of the time these days - I could swear that I end up on an Urbos 100 at least twice as often as I end up on an Urbos 3
Independent Alliance (Kent) Party Logo
Independent Alliance (Kent): 4/10
Looks more like a local village football club than a political party, but that sort of works for these local parties. The tree is overly detailed though and the signpost just looks weird.
omg thatβs exactly what it is how did I not realise
Scottish Socialist Party logo
Scottish Socialist Party: 3/10
Did someone make this in word art? The font looks dated and the star just looks a bit crap. Looks more like the logo of a continuation party of a former Eastern European communist party that collapsed upon democratic elections being held
Propel party logo
βͺPropel: 7/10β¬
βͺWelsh dragon goes hard as always. Colours are good, font is nice. However the diagonal cuts a little too close to the wording and the dragon for my liking. Plus it loses points for not really fitting on a ballot paperβ¬
Kingston Independent Residents Group logo
Kingston Independent Residents Group: 5/10
Nice colours, font isnβt too bad. But what the fuck is going on with that hand π
Honestly I canβt remember but thatβs what it reminded me of
Workers Revolutionary Party
Workers Revolutionary Party: 2/10
They just typed out their name, then made the βWβ, βRβ, and βPβ a slightly different shade. Perhaps the lowest effort yet. At least it has colour i guess π
Womenβs Equality Party logo
Womenβs Equality Party: 8/10
This one looks great, the big W and the more hidden E look cool, and the font is soooo nice. Suffragette colours are an extra bonus. Another one sadly consigned to history though, they dissolved last November βΉοΈ
Consensus: 0/10
They literally donβt have a logo, at least from what i can find. Their leader seems to have joined Reform UK a while back, before the election, so why theyβre even listed i have no idea
Animal Welfare Party logo
Animal Welfare Party: 4/10
Itβs not too bad, but the middle looks more like a second A rather than a W. Plus, the font at the bottom does not match at all
Abolish the Welsh Assembly Party logo
Abolish the Welsh Assembly Party: 3/10
The font is alright, if a little silly, but that logo is boring af. It just looks meaningless, like they oppose the existence of squares. Still, at least itβs the right colour for them
English Constitution Party logo
English Constitution Party: 2/10
What - no colour??? It literally has the St Georgeβs flag, at least make that red. Plus thereβs a big slogan around the outside. Pretty low effort. The shield is a nice shape, though, which is why itβs not a 1/10
The North East Party logo
The North East Party: 1/10
This is just their name (written twice for some reason), with a random photo of the Angel of the North. They could have *at least* used an icon of the Angel of the North. The fact they didnβt bother is not just bad, itβs offensive to my eyes
Alliance for Democracy and Freedom (ADF) party logo
Alliance for Democracy & Freedom: 4/10
I mean, it does the job I guess. Just a bit boring tbh, and the randomly-placed family just seem like a bad attempt at copying the Scottish Family Party. If anything it looks more like a weird evangelical religious organisation. Not great
True & Fair party logo
True & Fair Party: 5/10
It looks modern at least, but the spiral of colours just looks messy and doesnβt give the party much identity. Plus, thereβs a slogan on it. STOP PUTTING SLOGANS ON YOUR LOGO. Overall though, could be a lot worse, but needs to be a lot better
British Democrats logo
British Democrats: 2/10
Why is the Britannia so close in colour to the Union Jack? The Union Jack is already a busy enough design as it is, putting stuff on top of it doesnβt work. Plus, the font looks basic, the text is clearly an afterthought.
South Devon Alliance logo
South Devon Alliance: 7/10
Bit boring, but it works. Kinda looks like a green and black Pepsi logo. Text seems a bit random though, and is a bit small. Overall though, not bad
Climate Party logo
Climate Party: 6/10
Itβs clean and modern. The font being in italics looks a bit silly though, and the logo is a bit too abstract for my liking. Like other green parties, looks a bit too much like an energy company
Independent Oxford Alliance party logo
Independent Oxford Alliance: 5/10
The handshake is basic af, but at least itβs done well. Colours are nice, if a bit too similar to UKIPs. The font of the text isnβt too bad, but the whole layout looks a bit silly and is hard to read.
Democracy for Chorley party logo
Democracy for Chorley: 8/10
Old fashioned, but in a damn good way. A rare example of a logo that does better without colour. Itβs perhaps just a little busy, but still good. However, this logo is sadly consigned to history, as the party de-registered on the 24th of July 2024 βΉοΈ
Communist Party of Britain (CPB) logo
Communist Party of Britain: 5/10
Hammer and Sickle ofc, and it looks awesome. The font is a nice match, too. But the yellow wavy flag looks weird, the logo is too flag to make it work. Plus they should REALLY reconsider abbreviating themselves as βCPβ ffs
Hampshire Independents logo
Hampshire Independents: 4/10
The arrows are okay, but I see a massive missed opportunity to move the red arrow to the right, to create a βHβ for Hampshire. The font for βIndependentsβ looks good, but βHampshireβ was obviously just tacked on there. It doesnβt even line up!
Swale Independents logo
Swale Independents: 3/10
The font for the βSiβ looks a bit outdated, but not too bad. The outer ring though looks dumb, not just with their name at the top, but a SLOGAN too at the bottom. Ugh
And yes, this is the highest resolution version I could find
Liverpool Community Independents logo
Liverpool Community Independents: 6/10
The fonts are nice, and colours are too. Spiral thing looks cool, but the green drop shadow kinda ruins it unfortunately. If they found a different way to incorporate the green it would be wayyy better
Socialist Labour Party logo
Socialist Labour Party: 3/10
This looks like itβs from the 1960s, not 2024. Also the globe looks weird, even more weird when you realise ITS MISSING THE UK. THE COUNTRY THEY OPERATE IN. Also looks a bit too much like the old Starbucks logo.