scott b. weingart's Avatar

scott b. weingart

@scottbot

past: circus performer; historian of science; librarian; grantmaker; chief data & evaluation officer at NEH. present: dad; resident scholar at dartmouth; chief technology officer at the library of virginia. personal account. https://scottbot.github.io

3,547
Followers
1,603
Following
88
Posts
24.05.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by scott b. weingart @scottbot

see also

10.03.2026 20:54 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

๐Ÿซ 

10.03.2026 20:05 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I'll be rich!

10.03.2026 20:04 ๐Ÿ‘ 3 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Grammarly window showing "Scott Weingart" helping me out with a helpful writing tip.

Grammarly window showing "Scott Weingart" helping me out with a helpful writing tip.

I just made up the most inane-yet-me-sounding 150 words I could think of and shoved it into Grammarly, and indeed the first 'AI expert' it came up with to help was me.

10.03.2026 19:43 ๐Ÿ‘ 19 ๐Ÿ” 7 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3 ๐Ÿ“Œ 2
Grammarly window showing "Scott Weingart" helping me out with a helpful writing tip.

Grammarly window showing "Scott Weingart" helping me out with a helpful writing tip.

I just made up the most inane-yet-me-sounding 150 words I could think of and shoved it into Grammarly, and indeed the first 'AI expert' it came up with to help was me.

10.03.2026 19:43 ๐Ÿ‘ 19 ๐Ÿ” 7 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3 ๐Ÿ“Œ 2

Tomorrow!

10.03.2026 17:09 ๐Ÿ‘ 8 ๐Ÿ” 2 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Turns out a technology optimized over centuries actually works pretty well!

10.03.2026 14:36 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I'm in the "AI has good uses camp" but 99% of people working in our around AI are working as hard as they possibly can to alienate even me.

10.03.2026 12:19 ๐Ÿ‘ 8 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Question 7: If you chose "no, but I would like to" in Question 1, please write a 500-word apology to our contractor, OpenAI:

(โ—) This is a required question, and insufficient groveling will result in dire consequences.

10.03.2026 12:12 ๐Ÿ‘ 7 ๐Ÿ” 1 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

"๐˜๐˜ข๐˜ฎ. To be, or not to be, that is the Queลฟtion:"

๐Ÿ“Ž: It looks like Ham is trying to write a question! Have you considered adding a question mark, and one of the six basic question words ("who", "what", "where", "why", "when", or "how")? Hope that helps! ๐Ÿค—

10.03.2026 11:59 ๐Ÿ‘ 13 ๐Ÿ” 1 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

(Fun story! The military spends more on music annually than Congress spends on NEH.)

10.03.2026 09:48 ๐Ÿ‘ 7 ๐Ÿ” 2 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

(Fun story! The military spends more on music annually than Congress spends on NEH.)

10.03.2026 09:48 ๐Ÿ‘ 7 ๐Ÿ” 2 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

This was in 2014 or so, but they could have been ahead of their time!

10.03.2026 00:17 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Still shook by that college radio show: "Okay guys, this one's a deep cut and starts kinda slow, but stick around 'till the end because I think you'll like it. It's called Stairway to Heaven by a band called Led Zeppelin."

09.03.2026 23:45 ๐Ÿ‘ 13 ๐Ÿ” 1 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Indeed, and adjusting for inflation, the agency distributes only a third of what it awarded in the late '70s.

09.03.2026 22:41 ๐Ÿ‘ 8 ๐Ÿ” 3 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

As reported, NEH is now focusing more dollars on fewer awards. The fewer the awards, the more difficult it is for the wide breadth of the humanities to find support. That is, even though their budget hasn't decreased, their ability to provide structural support for the entire sector is shrinking.

09.03.2026 16:36 ๐Ÿ‘ 5 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

But realistically, a long-term vision isn't possible without federal support. To simply continue existing NEH funding levels in perpetuity as an endowment would take a one-time donation of $4.2 billion.

There are maybe fifty charitable foundations in the world with endowments that size.

09.03.2026 16:30 ๐Ÿ‘ 10 ๐Ÿ” 1 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

There are potential paths forward. Congress has the opportunity to grow and reshape NEH to be the support it has always needed to be. Organizations like the Federation of State Humanities Councils, the National Humanities Alliance, and ACLS are stepping up both to plug hole and to offer leadership.

09.03.2026 16:26 ๐Ÿ‘ 9 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

In an environment where the breadth of the humanities already gets so little (and private philanthropy has in recent years either receded entirely or focused on more specific areas), these programmatic and funding cuts will fundamentally alter public and academic humanities in the US.

09.03.2026 16:23 ๐Ÿ‘ 8 ๐Ÿ” 1 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

The programs shuttered at NEH were core infrastructure for some subdisciplines, or offered a critical route to the humanities for underrepresented communities.

Although some individual grant cuts were rescinded, in many cases the damage is already done: projects are shuttered, jobs are lost, etc.

09.03.2026 16:20 ๐Ÿ‘ 8 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
A chart showing how the relative sizes of federal grant funding in the US, with arts and humanities getting an infinitesimal portion.

A chart showing how the relative sizes of federal grant funding in the US, with arts and humanities getting an infinitesimal portion.

To offer some context, here's a graphic our fabulous intern Aidan Nuttall put together in 2023.

When we compared our per capita humanities research funding against 42 other countries, there was only a single country that spent less (South Africa), and most countries spent 10x-250x more.

09.03.2026 16:13 ๐Ÿ‘ 27 ๐Ÿ” 19 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

It's a truly distressing state on both sides of the pond, to be sure.

09.03.2026 15:00 ๐Ÿ‘ 3 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I no longer have access to the data from when I was at NEH, but we did a deep comparison of the UK and the US across several agencies and we found the UK spends about 10x more per person on the humanities specifically. But both countries underspend quite a bit compared to other wealthier nations.

09.03.2026 14:53 ๐Ÿ‘ 18 ๐Ÿ” 6 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

My partner certainly agrees!

09.03.2026 12:14 ๐Ÿ‘ 3 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Stop doing it, obviously, but also cut yourself some slack. Your expertise is unexpectedly, suddenly, and globally relevant! That's never a good thing for someone on social media.

09.03.2026 11:30 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
NEH AI Training Artificial intelligence: An overview for NEH Melanie Walsh (University of Washington) David Mimno (Cornell University) Matthew Wilkens (Cornell University)

(For those following along, the answer is: @mellymeldubs.bsky.social, @dmimno.bsky.social, and @mattwilkens.bsky.social taught that excellent AI for Humanists course at NEH.

Among other delightful lessons, on slide 75 they taught that AI tools shouldn't be used to analyze or critique grants.)

09.03.2026 01:15 ๐Ÿ‘ 12 ๐Ÿ” 3 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

If possible, prioritize attending conferences where you already know one senior or well-connected person who can introduce you around.

09.03.2026 02:08 ๐Ÿ‘ 5 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
NEH AI Training Artificial intelligence: An overview for NEH Melanie Walsh (University of Washington) David Mimno (Cornell University) Matthew Wilkens (Cornell University)

(For those following along, the answer is: @mellymeldubs.bsky.social, @dmimno.bsky.social, and @mattwilkens.bsky.social taught that excellent AI for Humanists course at NEH.

Among other delightful lessons, on slide 75 they taught that AI tools shouldn't be used to analyze or critique grants.)

09.03.2026 01:15 ๐Ÿ‘ 12 ๐Ÿ” 3 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

If only the DOGE boys had taken that marvelous AI for Humanists course we organized at NEH. I forget, who taught that again?

09.03.2026 01:10 ๐Ÿ‘ 10 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

With the right research/program team, this is among the best models for giving away lots of money and we need more such examples.

With taxpayer dollars and much more limited resources that need to be stretched broadly, it's harder to do this well.

08.03.2026 12:59 ๐Ÿ‘ 5 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0