It sure would be nice to have some money so i could do sowmthing similar.
11.03.2026 16:36
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
It sure would be nice to have some money so i could do sowmthing similar.
You know. I WANT to answer your question, because there is an answer to it.
But i dont trust you wont twist is somehow. And i dont feel like trying my way out ofbthe twist you build.
reminder that the appropriate response to dachau was not more training for the guards
(cf @andreapitzer.bsky.social )
Yes. And other things.
But this article was about his anti trans comments. So, i just kept my comments to that.
But please! Go off friend!
“That’s the one area I disagree,” he said of competitive sports. “But that’s not throwing the community under the bus.” Newsom’s national reputation began in 2004, when, as San Francisco’s mayor, he authorized marriage licenses for same-sex couples, years before marriage equality became federal law.
Trans person under bus: HE THREW ME UNDER THIS BUS!
Newsom: I did not throw them under the bus I'm an ally.
Trans person: NO, you actually threw me under this bus!
Newsom: So anyway, they're being dramatic.
He emphasized personal connections as well. “I have a trans godson,” he said, remarking that he signed what he described as “some of the most progressive trans legislation just nine months ago.”
"I have black friends"
What Gavin Newsom, & others like him, CONTINUE to fail in understanding is-
WE DONT CARE HOW MANY "PROTRANS" BILLS YOU'VE SIGNED GAVIN.
WE CARE THAT YOU ARE AGREEING WITH NAZIS.
You can't understand that, so you deflect & condescend.
Fuck you, you feckless snake.
www.advocate.com/politics/nat...
Blockity block block block
This bullshit just makes me want to fucking scream.
The PPB already gets so much of our money.
God damned theives.
BREAKING: A judge refused to block a Kansas law that invalidates the driver’s licenses of transgender people and allows trans people to be sued for using public restrooms.
This isn't the final say, and we will keep fighting in court to stop this discriminatory law.
Exactly.
Been sidelining on a downstream thread with a bunch of near-nazi dems over the last few days;
the kind of people who could literally an doctorates worth of number of classes on how Rambo is an antiwar film, and still argue that the police in the film were right all along afterwards.
my, migraine..
my gods.. doing an image search for "slutty Triceratops" is... dopamine releasing.
I mean... it IS.
Which, they are. Ineffective that is.
wow, you are really fucking braindead aren't you?
Why is a person throwing a rock or brick at a window automatically considered mentally ill? Why is a person throwing a rock or brick at a window automatically considered mentally ill?
LOOK AROUND.
There are many reasons why someone might be throwing a brick at a government building.
"blueskeee"
okay, so the driver gets a graduated list of punishments, but the rock thrower get instantly labeled "a danger to themselves and others", for which, in our society, results in near instant institutionalization.
interesting.
god. what a terrible name.
Are you saying this isn't a paraphrase of "due process"
?
YOU ARE A DISGUSTING, DEPLORABLE PERSON.
SO, are you against people protesting unreasonable fairs?
They were presented as equals.
Objective bads.
Some of us criticized that.
Some of you, attacked us for it.
My point here is, you're off base and maybe you need to chill.
Why is someone throwing a brick, a FAR less dangerous action than running a red light with a multi-thousand pound vehicle, somehow deserving of less due process?
DEMs, Some of yall out there talking like Nazi's for fucking real.
ALL actions carry the threat of risk.
"IMMINENT THREAT" doesn't mean someone's action MIGHT harm someone.
"IMMINENT THREAT" means someone's actions WILL harm someone.
SO by your logic, we should institutionalize, again, FOREVER, people for running red lights too.
nice talk.
YOU DO UNDERSTAND THAT SOMEONE COULD HAVE REASONS FOR DOING SOMETHING THAT LEAD TO UNINTENTIONAL ACTION RIGHT?