Just wanted to share my excitement: I have a few days planned in London where I will get to talk about research with a bunch of incredible scholars, followed by plans to hang out in pubs with myself and a book, listen to some live music and enjoy my time in this half homecountry of mine. π¬π§πΊπ€πΆπΈ
05.03.2026 08:13
π 24
π 1
π¬ 1
π 0
These are the Frank books I have in mind (great for UG teaching):
www.amazon.fr/Darwin-Econo...
www.amazon.com/Winner-Take-...
03.03.2026 16:41
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
For colleagues in the London area: next week (6-7 March), we're hosting the annual LSE Behavioural Political Economy Workshop at @lsegovernment.bsky.social together with @florianfoos.bsky.social and @thchau.bsky.social. If you'd like to come, please sign up here: forms.cloud.microsoft/e/uxaAx17DHq
27.02.2026 12:31
π 24
π 8
π¬ 1
π 4
We're excited to welcome an outstanding speaker lineup featuring @danbischof.bsky.social, @mariacarreri.bsky.social, @ccavaille.bsky.social, @aeggers.bsky.social, @michaeleldar.bsky.social, @haasvioleta.bsky.social, Carlo Horz, Korhan KoΓ§ak and @aykutozturk.bsky.social π«
27.02.2026 14:47
π 6
π 2
π¬ 1
π 0
Also that LFI has managed to be perceived as extremists baffles me (it isn't "crazy left"). Feels like 1990s Newt Gingrich is colonizing French politics in ways that an argument based on institutional design cannot explain.
27.02.2026 12:40
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
I am personally concerned the centrists/center-right are going to abstain instead of choosing LFI over RN.
27.02.2026 12:38
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
"Few Reform supporters have voted for Labour at any point in the 21st century. This is true if we look at where Farageβs parties drew votes between 2015 and 2025, and across twenty years of voting history" This type of conclusion is not specific to the UK.
27.02.2026 12:37
π 34
π 8
π¬ 2
π 3
Same thing happening in France though in this case, many think LFI's leadership style plays a key role. Or maybe it provides an easy scapegoat for people on the left who feel helpless.
27.02.2026 12:23
π 1
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
we all are, we have to get published! I'll read more carefully your argument and share thoughts later!
27.02.2026 11:40
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
I just dont think I habe the answer though :-) I just wish we were more collectively humble in our claims. Anti-immigrant sentiment is a behavior (among others) that we struggle to explain according to the scientific method.
27.02.2026 11:34
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Work connecting people's socio-economic context to anti-immigrant sentiment as mediated by social identity is often debated. But I am struggling to find good empirical
tests that do not "regress attitudes on attitudes." (4/4)
27.02.2026 11:29
π 0
π 0
π¬ 2
π 0
Finally, most studies do not explain the strong education gradient and the well documented *causal* impact of local economic decline / hardship (3/4).
27.02.2026 11:29
π 0
π 0
π¬ 2
π 0
I would argue that few studies carefully document this causal chain. I would also argue that few studies connect this type of causal mechanism to support for Trumps' crackdown. (2/4)
27.02.2026 11:29
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Happy to chat! To be clear, I think it is very important to show that it is islamophobia more than let's say arabo-phobia that is driving anti-Muslim prejudice. One can then hypothesize that people who have invested in a Christian identity are more committed to policies that make Xty the norm. (1/4)
27.02.2026 11:29
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
super important findings that I read as a way of generalizing what the ethnography says about meaning making. The Why question on the other hand remains unanswered. The more I read the less I believe we can actually explain anti-immigrant backlash...
27.02.2026 11:08
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Very! Confirms me in my assessment that this literature need to defend itself against accusations of tautology (people who have a predisposition to dislike people of type A are more likely to be prejudiced against people of type A).
27.02.2026 11:07
π 1
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Thank you, no I had not seen that one! (that's because I explicitly censored research on discrimination to keep it manageable, bad idea it seems)
27.02.2026 10:35
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
I have been trying to summarize social psychology research on anti-immigrant sentiment for 3 weeks now. While I can summarize families of results based on types of designs, I still struggle to summarize the theory used to make sense of results. Anybody has a clearly written piece they can recommend?
27.02.2026 10:22
π 1
π 1
π¬ 1
π 0
Hurray!
20.02.2026 10:24
π 2
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
I just registered for European Political Science Society's (@epssnet.bsky.social) first conference! I'm excited to connect with old friends, meet new ones, and hear the latest work at this excellent event. Let this be your reminder to sign up today!
cc @sarahobolt.bsky.social @simonhix.bsky.social
17.02.2026 21:19
π 20
π 2
π¬ 1
π 0
Can I nuance? The fact that it is rare does not mean that the theory should die, merely that it is underspecified. For a long time, actual vote for the far-right was higher than reported vote, and @valentimvicente.bsky.social has great showing how this has changed, why and with what consequences.
13.02.2026 09:53
π 4
π 0
π¬ 2
π 0
I assign this piece :-) (or early versions of Ruhs and Baubock)
25.01.2026 14:37
π 3
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
I read your piece as arguing that humanitarian/liberal ethics guide pro-im. advocacy and that communitarian ethics do not. To me the question is: can you study immigration without explicitly stating your ethical starting point (ESP)? If your answer is "No," then how would define your own ESP?
25.01.2026 14:36
π 2
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Hi @anagantman.bsky.social ! I read this piece with much interest! The paper mentions that the first 2 rounds involved "unfair" offers. Do you think your results would hold if you had a unC treatment condition with fair offers?
25.01.2026 12:49
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
For anyone working toward this dreaded Jan 13th ERC deadline: nearly there!
08.01.2026 07:35
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Cool network data that does not involve railroads :-)
06.01.2026 08:43
π 7
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Anyone saw what Andy Hall did with Claude (on X)? Very cool!
Looks like AI can:
1) become the (neutral) replication police (replicates prior results + runs a subset of low-hanging fruit extensions including out of sample rep)
2) encourage theory and design innovation in surveys
Count me in!
04.01.2026 14:31
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
"Communautarisme" back then used to implicitly mean "anglo multiculturalism." Now it seems to mean "non-French" , a form of inclusion/exclusion rhetoric that smells far right IMHO, especially when mentioned alongside accusation of "islamisme".
02.01.2026 10:07
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0