dougmelamed.bsky.social

Doesn’t reducing by 1000% mean that the buyer gets the drug plus 9X the pre-reduction purchase price in money?

There is consistent principle that can explain SCOTUS’ decisions. Race cannot be taken into account when doing so might disadvantage Whites. But it’s ok when it harms Blacks and Hispanics.

An important speech by Roger Alford, recently of the Antitrust Division. Must reading for anyone who cares about the rule of law. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

money

It’s wonderful that so many firms signed on.
I hope everyone also notes the large number of large, wealthy firms that did not sign. There are enough to constitute a new Hall of Shame.

It’s a good, albeit long overdue, start to the things the ABA should do in response to the assault on the rule of law.

the rule of law

Paul Weiss had little choice. The real private sector villains in the story are the law firms, lawyers, clients, ABA, and other associations that did not join together to defend the 3 attacked firms and the rule of law. Instead, they scrubbed their websites.

Why not address the substance of his analysis instead of dismissing him (and implicitly his analysis) on the basis of ad hominem conjecture?

Trump, Vance, and Musk criticizing people for being cruel and destroying lives. That’s rich.

It’s like expecting Jordan and Egypt to accept political refugees.

This is really excellent. It's too bad that the chances that it will be read and taken seriously by Bondi or those close to her are miniscule.

Come on, Fiona. Even if one thinks that SCOTUS is motivated to support Trump's political agenda, do you really think 5 or more of the 9 Justices on the TikTok decision (or even fewer) were motivated to enable Trump to make a personal financial gain?

Congratulations! A terrific and well-deserved honor.

Biden cannot immunize the AG. Instead, he should order the AG to send the report to him (POTUS), and then he should release it.