I was in a 2 hour briefing today on the Iran War. All the briefings are closed, because Trump can't defend this war in public.
I obviously can't disclose classified info, but you deserve to know how incoherent and incomplete these war plans are.
1/ Here's what I can share:
11.03.2026 01:03
π 11253
π 4594
π¬ 302
π 648
So important to ask questions like this π
09.03.2026 22:56
π 26
π 6
π¬ 1
π 1
FT comments section this morning - saying what everyone else is thinking, right?
05.03.2026 07:15
π 17195
π 5996
π¬ 515
π 492
Thank you for your expertise @mikeschmitt.bsky.social and Elizabeth Hutton:
09.03.2026 16:22
π 3
π 2
π¬ 0
π 0
Important from @bcfinucane.bsky.social on a possible #Iran war supplemental.
My view: Congress should use its power of the purse to put an end to this tragic and unnecessary disaster now.
Short of that, they must refuse a request to appropriate funds for it.
Even the minority has power here.
09.03.2026 16:20
π 34
π 14
π¬ 3
π 0
"That's essentially not a high bar when you're talking about nation states bombing each other... We were at war the moment we started dropping bombs on Iran."
@tessbridgeman.bsky.social explains to @sarahlongwell25.bsky.social why it's legally accurate to call what's happening in Iran a war.
07.03.2026 22:01
π 113
π 25
π¬ 4
π 2
"The idea that bombing our way to regime change solely from the air is going to help the people. Is one that has just been disproven so many times in history, that trying it again right now is a fool's errand at best."
@tessbridgeman.bsky.social on the futility of Trump's Iran war strategy.
08.03.2026 04:00
π 377
π 68
π¬ 12
π 7
Watch the full episode of The Illegal News at lnk.thebulwark.com/4aoCA1S and YouTube, or listen on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
08.03.2026 04:00
π 34
π 6
π¬ 1
π 0
It is inaccurate to say that every administration has regarded the War Powers Resolution to be unconstitutional.
@tessbridgeman.bsky.social and I wrote about this issue in January. 2/n
www.justsecurity.org/128517/war-p...
08.03.2026 13:45
π 21
π 7
π¬ 1
π 0
π§΅Some War Powers notes on this exchange:
If Trump admin has a legal theory for attacking Iran w/o congressional authorization, it is almost certainly that the US military action does not amount to "war in the constitutional sense."
POTUS (correctly) calling it a "war," is therefore unhelpful. 1/n
08.03.2026 13:45
π 62
π 17
π¬ 3
π 0
It was great to join @weissmann.substack.com and Mary for such a thoughtful conversation - though I wish we werenβt talking about (another) illegal and reckless war. Listen on #Iran, war powers, and what it all means in context:
06.03.2026 20:25
π 68
π 9
π¬ 2
π 1
The authority that Trump has asserted in taking America to war against Iran is, like many of his other power grabs, an expression of the very tyranny the Framers were seeking to prevent.
βKings had always been involving and impoverishing their people in wars, pretending generally, if not always, that the good of the people was the object,β a young congressman named Abraham Lincoln wrote in 1848. This was βunderstood to be the most oppressive of all Kingly oppressions and they resolved to so frame the Constitution that no one man should hold the power of bringing this oppression upon us.β This quote, incidentally, is immortalized on the Houseβs website, if any members of Congress are looking for it.
The design of the Constitution divided warmaking authority between Congress and the executive to prevent a president to take the country to war by themselves for any petty or self-serving reason. You know, like a king would. www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/0...
04.03.2026 22:04
π 1664
π 427
π¬ 29
π 6
20260302A
A living resource on presidential reporting practice and the use of U.S. armed forces abroad.
The Trump Admin has sent a war powers report on Iran to Congress, its 6th report this term.
Amidst shifting explanations for the war, it's an important document for the public.
Now analyzed and available on our #WarPowersResolutionReportingProject site:
warpowers.lawandsecurity.org/reports/2026...
04.03.2026 18:23
π 4
π 2
π¬ 0
π 0
@justsecurity.org's Israel-Us-Iran collection has already developed into a mini-syllabus for the war's legal aspects. All of the pieces can be found here, and surely more will come:
www.justsecurity.org/114556/colle...
04.03.2026 18:18
π 8
π 3
π¬ 1
π 1
Double Preemption, Imminence, and the U.S. Attack Against Iran
Rubioβs argument that Operation Epic Fury was preemptive self-defense is not credible and does not satisfy the necessary precondition.
Vitally important by Eliav Lieblich on why the anticipatory self-defense (which some are calling preemption) argument US officials have tried to make to justify their war in #Iran collapses completely.
Clear, concise, thoughtful, must read:
www.justsecurity.org/133093/preem...
03.03.2026 22:51
π 14
π 5
π¬ 0
π 0
Double Preemption, Imminence, and the U.S. Attack Against Iran
Rubioβs argument that Operation Epic Fury was preemptive self-defense is not credible and does not satisfy the necessary precondition.
Vitally important by Eliav Lieblich on why the anticipatory self-defense (which some are calling preemption) argument US officials have tried to make to justify their war in #Iran collapses completely.
Clear, concise, thoughtful, must read:
www.justsecurity.org/133093/preem...
03.03.2026 22:51
π 14
π 5
π¬ 0
π 0
The one question everyone should be asking after OpenAIβs deal with the Pentagon
The US said we canβt afford to let a surveillance state like China win the AI race. Well...
Good line of analysis from @sigalsamuel.bsky.social.
"But what if authoritarian rule that uses tech to surveil people in alarming ways is already becoming the norm in the US? If America is shape-shifting into the bogeyman it critiques, what happens to the case for racing ahead on AI?"
03.03.2026 19:20
π 46
π 20
π¬ 2
π 4
Trumpβs Case for War With Iran Faces Growing Scrutiny
U.S. intelligence showed threats from Iran loomed, as they had for years. But they were not imminent.
2/ "Some lawmakers and U.S. officials say Iran was nowhere near capable of building a nuclear weapon, even if Tehran seeks one. They also say there is NO EVIDENCE to support Trumpβs claim that Iran could rapidly develop a missile capable of striking the U.S."
www.wsj.com/world/middle...
03.03.2026 02:06
π 510
π 125
π¬ 10
π 6
Trumpβs Case for War With Iran Faces Growing Scrutiny
U.S. intelligence showed threats from Iran loomed, as they had for years. But they were not imminent.
"U.S. officials and lawmakers with access to classified information ... say the administrationβs assertions are incomplete, unsubstantiated, or flat-out wrong."
- Wall Street Journal
03.03.2026 02:04
π 2002
π 735
π¬ 92
π 53
Top Questions the Trump Administration Needs to Answer on War with Iran
Congress and journalists should demand answers to these questions, many of which should have been answered prior to the war beginning
2/
Subset isolates when POTUS made decision to abandon negotiations, resort to war.
Subset gets at pre-strike assessments - what stakes for the American people were considered, and for the region.
Subset gets at intelligence assessments and levels of confidence on what happens next.
Much more.
03.03.2026 04:05
π 83
π 20
π¬ 2
π 0
Top Questions the Trump Administration Needs to Answer on War with Iran
Congress and journalists should demand answers to these questions, many of which should have been answered prior to the war beginning
With senior US officials briefing Congress on Tuesday about Iran war plans.
I teamed up with @tessbridgeman.bsky.social @k8brannen.bsky.social
Top Questions the Trump Administration Needs to Answer on War with Iran
Also plenty of questions for journalists (and the public) here.
π§΅1/
03.03.2026 04:01
π 177
π 79
π¬ 10
π 3
This is an important point. A capability β an imminent threat of armed attack.
Here's how @mikeschmitt.bsky.social, @rgoodlaw.bsky.social and I explained it recently:
www.justsecurity.org/132180/us-ir...
03.03.2026 18:08
π 27
π 10
π¬ 2
π 1
βBy Hegsethβs standard, any country having any advanced defensive weaponry of any kind can be labeled an imminent threat.β
trib.al/7Q6ZGAX
03.03.2026 18:04
π 93
π 34
π¬ 3
π 1
Top Questions the Trump Administration Needs to Answer on War with Iran
Congress and journalists should demand answers to these questions, many of which should have been answered prior to the war beginning
Folks on the Hill, these are Qs that should have been answered prior to the #Iran war if Trump had come to Congress as he must under the law.
Qs cover:
-stragegy/goals/off-ramps
-domestic & int'l law
-targeting & LOAC
-costs & readiness
-long-term consequences
www.justsecurity.org/132970/quest...
03.03.2026 14:46
π 8
π 4
π¬ 0
π 2
Trump argues for forever wars
Trump is now defending βforeverβ wars.
The linchpin of his populist-style critique of the foreign policy establishment was that it got us into βforeverβ wars.
Trump isnβt just defending his war with Iran. Now he is claiming that he can wage βforeverβ wars βvery successfully.β
03.03.2026 15:19
π 268
π 105
π¬ 28
π 12
If this were SNL it would be funny, a parody of a declining dictator...
But all too seriously, this is the President's confused musing about the abuse of his power to direct the US military into aimless war.
With staggering real consequences for lives, security, the economy, & the rule of law.
03.03.2026 17:19
π 7
π 3
π¬ 0
π 0
Top Questions the Trump Administration Needs to Answer on War with Iran
Congress and journalists should demand answers to these questions, many of which should have been answered prior to the war beginning
Folks on the Hill, these are Qs that should have been answered prior to the #Iran war if Trump had come to Congress as he must under the law.
Qs cover:
-stragegy/goals/off-ramps
-domestic & int'l law
-targeting & LOAC
-costs & readiness
-long-term consequences
www.justsecurity.org/132970/quest...
03.03.2026 14:46
π 8
π 4
π¬ 0
π 2