Since when do fascists get permanently immunized from "reputational damage" that they caused entirely by themselves? Why do only the fascists get this benefit?
14.03.2026 03:17
👍 1
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
Since when do fascists get permanently immunized from "reputational damage" that they caused entirely by themselves? Why do only the fascists get this benefit?
Because they aren't for America as it actually exists. They are for a fascist, white supremacist version that they make up on the fly and then edit on the fly if parts of it turn out to be not cruel enough.
Especially when we actually have "taken out" less than 10% of their mining vessels, minus all the miscellaneous small vessels that could be adapted for laying mines.
Oh, trust me: it's VERY obvious to the media that report on him.
It doesn't matter what you accept; the question was well within bounds and as I already correctly noted, it allowed the senator to defend his viewpoint extremely well. So, in sum, the exchange was informative to the audience and served a journalistic purpose. This isn't even a close call.
Entirely reasonable question to ask. And Obama was joking, of course, in a context where everyone is roasting each other.
Creative framing but not correct. The question is entirely reasonable in context and it gave Murphy an opportunity to make a strong point.
Not surprising. The drama nerds are always a lot smarter.
Tuberville is a corrupt idiot who was in the SEC and had people doing all the cheating for him and just feeding him the players. He didn't have to know anything.
This is also one of the best arguments AGAINST term limits in the House and Senate. It takes time to get good at this stuff, to develop the experience to get it right.
Does it, though? Does it really? Congress hasn't declared war since 1942—and that was against Bulgaria, Hungary, and Romania.
Suffice it to say that Congress was a little late to the party.
We may WANT a world in which it is Congress that declares war, but we don't live in that world right now.
I like to distract myself from the terrifying political news by reading the ridiculous political news.
Nothing wrong here that a few hard slaps won't fix.
If you have the smallest screen in the world, maybe. Also, "much of the day" is doing a lot of work here.
Was a top story for most of a news cycle and is still on their front page right now.
What we're going to work on is kicking your ass and then writing a Fake-Ass Hillbilly Elegy for you once you've been excised from public office, JD. And that's it. Nothing else.
We're done here, btw.
Do you have magical Harry Potter spells that enable you to make up incredibly stupid shit and then pretend that other people "believe" it?
Also, do you know anything about impeachment?
Lastly, are you a functional adult who can comprehend that impeaching does nothing if you can't convict?
Actually, legally, you don't even need ID. They will screen you more, they may harass you, but it's not legally required. Look it up.
www.tsa.gov/travel/frequ...
Anywhere up to about 70% of the time. The rest of the time, honestly, you really should be sleeping. ;)
This is too idiotic of a response to even bother replying to.
Wait til they hear that it was Joe Biden who made the bald eagle the national bird of the United States.
www.reviewjournal.com/news/nation-...
Right. I mean, look, we covered this in the 80s and 90s already. This is settled law.
This random asshole lost me the moment he said "the most important thing that Tucker says".
Tucker Carlson has never said anything important in his life. Not ever, not once.
Not really, but let's just say, after decades of Trump escaping any consequences for any of his dozens of crimes, I will believe the accountability when I actually see it and not before.
Also note that Epstein's legal team included Ken Starr, who was so aggressive in going after Bill Clinton for entirely consensual sex with a 24-year-old.
That's precisely what we saw with the Jan. 6th criminals.
So it's obviously likely to occur. It's not about what I think.
It's not "Congress". It's Republicans. Say their names. Democrats impeached him twice and would have convicted him if there had been a very small amount of Republican support.
Does it matter if the law is never enforced, and if the law-breaker dies without ever having been held responsible, and if all those who aided and abetted the conduct also escape responsibility? Because that's what seems likely to occur, here.
I'm no expert, but unlike pythons, our hearts are contained within a rather rigid bony structure. :) I don't think having our hearts grow by gigantic amounts would work out well for us.