So "isometric" was in distribution? 😉 bsky.app/profile/nsap...
05.03.2026 15:10
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
So "isometric" was in distribution? 😉 bsky.app/profile/nsap...
Relatedly, global warming denial entirely vanished after a few years once ppl had more datapoints and could estimate the rate of global temperature increases themselves.
From https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/is-pre-nuclear-steel-behind-wwii-ship-targeting/
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-background_steel
An apt simile, as an overhyped concern that was only ever relevant for some very exotic use cases and has become irrelevant now ("special low-background steel [is] no longer necessary for most radiation-sensitive uses, as new steel now has a low enough radioactive signature")
Another Stanford tech bro falling for The AI Con. Fortunately we still have the real experts from the UW linguistics department helping us to see through this flimflam
I'm curious about the impact of OpenAI's free ChatGPT Go offer in India (I understand this includes Codex CLI) www.ndtv.com/india-news/c...
Isn't that exactly why Anthropic was set up as a PBC? www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMF1...
Very interesting to see a "City on Mars" coauthor make such easily falsifiable claims.
Whatever one thinks about Elon and China, Nvidia-backed Starcloud already launched a test satellite in November (and just filed an FCC proposal for 88,000 more): www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/star...
Or, this European feasibility study explicitly highlighted this as a potential application of "robotic technologies" www.thalesaleniaspace.com/en/press-rel... (Unlike Starcloud, this hasn't resulted in any launches yet, but it's another counterexample to the idea that "The Idea" drives such ideas)
All fair regarding the lack of business cases for people in space.
But who exactly is claiming that datacenters in space require crewed missions? E.g. the Starcloud whitepaper (starcloudinc.github.io/wp.pdf ) doesn't mention them.
What does "Show less like this" do concretely in the current Discover feed, and what would be its equivalent in a future PinnerSage-based implementation?
I mean, even Robespierre ended under the guillotine too, despite his impeccable credentials as a fervent @jacobinmag.bsky.social activist
Here is the new ruling btw - it was mostly about upholding the earlier jury verdict on procedural grounds (but yes, it seems that "admission of statements made by Elon Musk" may have influenced that verdict considerably): www.plainsite.org/courts/flori...
"a 1937 bus schedule to Jones Beach" (https:__www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/11/10/robert-moses-saga-racist-parkway-bridges/ )
"a state promotional photo showing buses parked in front of the famed water tower" at Jones Beach (https:__www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/11/10/robert-moses-saga-racist-parkway-bridges/ )
Appreciate the reply, but I'm surprised to see the WaPo fact-checker's analysis (based on conversations with multiple experts) dismissed as "first Google result".
Happy to read further if you have tips; in the meantime, via WaPo, a 1937 bus schedule for what Caro calls "Moses’s beloved Jones Beach":
This looks interesting and concerning, but your reliance on that largely debunked bridges story (www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202... ) doesn't quite inspire confidence in the evidentiary standards guiding this research.
By that hypothesis, the gender trust gap should have shrunk over the last few decades, as the gender ratio among active scientists improved markedly during that time. Is that consistent with your data?
www.insidehighered.com/news/diversi...
PS: wrong profile link, was meant to be @natmed.nature.com
Direct link for those who prefer to access that Kleist article in the German original: de.wikisource.org/wiki/%C3%9Cb...
Indeed, leaving this up seems pretty irresponsible at this point, also because the (appreciated) correction of that blatantly wrong allegation about violations of @naturemedicine.bsky.social's disclosure policy is likely to be overlooked by most bsky.app/profile/emil...
Wasn't your objection to the word "trial" instead? It's still entirely unclear why that should be regarded as "misleading" here. (As @brendannyhan.bsky.social indicated, the term "randomized controlled trial" has long been used for experiments that don't involve patient "care" in any sense.)
(and besides its direct impact on the platform itself, a section 230 repeal would have lots of indirect effects too, per this detailed post by @wikimediapolicy.bsky.social :
medium.com/wikimedia-po... )
Thanks for drawing attention to this.
BTW, when doing that brief recap of section 230's importance by listing examples of platforms it protects (2:15), please consider mentioning Wikipedia too next time
www.eff.org/issues/cda23...
https://www.deutschestextarchiv.de/book/view/marx_kapital01_1867/?p=439
The German original calls them "Pöbelexzesse" ("mob excesses").
"Es bedarf Zeit und Erfahrung, bevor der Arbeiter die Maschinerie von ihrer kapitalistischen Anwendung unterscheiden und daher seine Angriffe [...] auf [deren] gesellschaftliche Ausbeutungsform übertragen lernt."
cf. bsky.app/profile/emol...
Glitchy and technically outdated by now, but still a fan of all the Veo 3 community theater productions like x.com/CommTheater/...
Good to question whether such laws actually yield the desired effects.
But the paper seems oblivious to the fact that the act’s notice-and-takedown requirement isn't in force yet ("Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, a covered platform shall establish a process ...")
See also bsky.app/profile/pekk...
Another example has similar problems: bsky.app/profile/conn...
"Rate limit reached" 🫠
Great post, but unfortunately the link under "Examples include removed editions of presidential newsletters" is 404 😉 (this version still works: qz.com/1388315/the-... )
