Hawk, Eagle, Raven

Making accountability great again.

Only one way to know for sure. But, I'll say this: we know exactly what they will do in the absence of such a movement. The guns are already out.

Preach.

I hear ya. What does that look like to you?

Unfortunately, laying fault at the feet of the Rs won’t save anyone. We need to save ourselves.

Journalists are trained for objectivity. That doesn’t mean they have to cower in the face of one of their member being mistreated. There’s no professional compulsion to bend to abusiveness. One can argue it’s impossible to both be objective and silent in this case. (Trained journalist here.)

There’s nothing at all unprofessional about calling out unacceptable behavior from people in power. They don’t have to be puerile jerks like him; they just need to speak up, and register their objection. It’s the only adult option.

Good luck. Try not to hurt anyone. Yourself included.

You really don’t understand the nature of the moment you’re in.

I believe that’s referred to as cognitive implosion.

Don’t be a child. The stakes are too high.

The existence of Medicare is strong proof of age-based discrimination *against* elderly. Same with senior living. Check it out; look into why they’re there. If you still have Qs, let me know.

I don’t know what you’re referring to specifically, but in principle, discrimination is an obvious problem.

I mean, this does kinda sorta walk softly by the dark facts of elections, whistling as it goes, does it not?

If you go back and sound that statement out, you’ll see the problems with it.

The DNC needs work.

Age isn’t the right criteria, period. The loudest voices who say it is are propagandists. Most of the rest just don’t think it thru. The remainder: elderly=useless eaters. Old people aren’t the prob. Neither are young people. Focus on evidence of excellence in results; vote accordingly.

Yes. There’s little debate abt it. Spend a few minutes looking for it and you’ll find it. It’s not hidden.

The age of electeds is not under discussion here. But, if your litmus test for leadership is age, you’re adopting a raging logical fallacy, even if the bigotry of it doesn’t bother you.

It’s not the cause of powerful people that is the focus, and especially people who can be voted out of power if we so choose. It’s the furtherance of age-related bigotry, which, like its racist and sexist varieties massively disadvantages entire groups of people. And is beyond intellectually lazy.

Can you think of a way of saying that that doesn’t rely the verbal crutch and blatant ageism of this one?

Thanks for furthering the cause of bigotry, ageism-style. Good to see you can work across the aisle.

This is the right take when the Admin wakes up in the morning and decides that it needs to try more dumb shit.

And a great reminder that 6/10ths are not that. Not sure what the benefit is in dwelling on those we’ve left behind. We have the numbers; let’s use our strength to make change.

The stuff that needs to be said today; Jesus H.

Stick with the truth tellers. You can note the deception, and recognize that lying is how they get by. But that’s abt it. They’ll fool some people (mostly the willing) but polls are pretty clear that the vast majority aren’t buying it. Make friends w/the vast majority that care abt truth.

For those who don't know, it's "A sml grp of people having control of a country or institution." One indication this regime is an oligarchy: CEOs standing on the inaugural stage. Another: unelected billionaire w/unfettered access to govt systems, law enforcement and citizens' private info.

The outrageously petty exemption from ordinary patriotic duty?

If the Marshals Go Rogue, Courts Have Other Ways to Enforce their Orders Opinion | Even a rogue marshal’s service is not an insurmountable obstacle to courts enforcing the rule of law.

www.democracydocket.com/opinion/if-t...

Thank you. The age-based division is…divisive. And inaccurate.