I’ve answered more of your questions than you have mine, and I’m still waiting for that count. Do you know how to count? Can you prove that?
(This is an answer, by the way.)
I’ve answered more of your questions than you have mine, and I’m still waiting for that count. Do you know how to count? Can you prove that?
(This is an answer, by the way.)
That’s ridiculous; are French-Americans not represented because they didn’t get a speaking spot at the Democratic convention? You’re being dishonest again.
lol
So, you believe it’s relevant because you believe I’ve been called anti-Semitic? I’m not seeing how that follows. Have you been called anti-Semitic?
I just don’t know that rights conflict and courts resolve those conflicts? Literally everyone gives up absolute rights to live in a society, & calling me a racist is just your knowing that you can’t win that argument.
Here’s another.
If you’re not going to be honest, why should I answer?
bsky.app/profile/josh...
Does everyone have a right to speak at a political convention?
No. Answer the question. Stop dodging.
So you were wrong about the larger point, right?
Please count the number of previously answered questions and reply with an accurate count. After all, there’s no point in answering your questions if you’re just going to lie about it.
Please answer why it’s relevant.
Yes, I already noted that you conceded the rest of my argument.
No one denied them the vote based on being Palestinian. Stop being dishonest.
It’s all I need to prove you lied when you said zero. Keep up.
Oh good, you’re one of those racists. Tell me why that would be relevant.
So, you do regularly give up your rights to free speech in other areas, the point relevant to candidate disclosure, thank you for confirming.
You don’t need dualism to recognize the limits of computational functionalism
www.noemamag.com/the-mytholog...
It’s literally efficient market theory vs gambler’s conceit
Taxes are too low
Oh, so they’ll carry malpractice insurance?
Yeah, Falklands discourse is cool, but Jim Jones was woke.
Like I’ve said a million times, voting is necessary but not sufficient.
Perjury is illegal. Fraud is illegal. Incitement to violence is illegal.
If they’re citizens of the US, their right to vote has nothing to do with being Palestinian.
And no, Palestinian is an ethnicity, not a race. If it’s a race, French is also a race.
You’re flailing.
I literally answered one just a few posts upthread
Try again.
bsky.app/profile/josh...
No, and no one denied them the right to vote based on being Palestinian and American. You’re just making shit up.
So, you hate waffles?
C’mon
around the thesis that visual depictions influence behavior in break rooms, without any actual data collected, is more dishonest than my citing studies more directly connected to the claims.
the large n & p testing, not effect size or consistency with the overarching claims of watchful eye effect.
The actual results of this study are stronger on much narrower claims than earlier watchful eye studies, & casting this as removing watchful eye from replicability concerns, especially
real life rewards.
They got the most altruistic distribution by having participants imagine a flower, then seeing eyes, then imagining eyes, then seeing a flower.
The SD on all of them was larger than the difference in effects between modes or images.
The claim of “significance” is only with