Kierkegaarden Cop's Avatar

Kierkegaarden Cop

@joshsteich

Let's try the medium place

816
Followers
1,378
Following
6,806
Posts
23.09.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Kierkegaarden Cop @joshsteich

I’ve answered more of your questions than you have mine, and I’m still waiting for that count. Do you know how to count? Can you prove that?

(This is an answer, by the way.)

08.03.2026 17:49 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

That’s ridiculous; are French-Americans not represented because they didn’t get a speaking spot at the Democratic convention? You’re being dishonest again.

08.03.2026 17:47 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

lol

So, you believe it’s relevant because you believe I’ve been called anti-Semitic? I’m not seeing how that follows. Have you been called anti-Semitic?

08.03.2026 17:45 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

I just don’t know that rights conflict and courts resolve those conflicts? Literally everyone gives up absolute rights to live in a society, & calling me a racist is just your knowing that you can’t win that argument.

08.03.2026 17:43 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Here’s another.

If you’re not going to be honest, why should I answer?

bsky.app/profile/josh...

08.03.2026 17:25 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Does everyone have a right to speak at a political convention?

08.03.2026 16:15 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

No. Answer the question. Stop dodging.

08.03.2026 16:15 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

So you were wrong about the larger point, right?

08.03.2026 16:14 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Please count the number of previously answered questions and reply with an accurate count. After all, there’s no point in answering your questions if you’re just going to lie about it.

08.03.2026 16:13 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Please answer why it’s relevant.

08.03.2026 16:12 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Yes, I already noted that you conceded the rest of my argument.

08.03.2026 16:07 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

No one denied them the vote based on being Palestinian. Stop being dishonest.

08.03.2026 16:06 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

It’s all I need to prove you lied when you said zero. Keep up.

08.03.2026 16:05 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Oh good, you’re one of those racists. Tell me why that would be relevant.

08.03.2026 16:04 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

So, you do regularly give up your rights to free speech in other areas, the point relevant to candidate disclosure, thank you for confirming.

08.03.2026 16:02 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Preview
The Mythology Of Conscious AI | NOEMA Why consciousness is more likely a property of life than of computation and why creating conscious, or even conscious-seeming AI, is a bad idea.

You don’t need dualism to recognize the limits of computational functionalism

www.noemamag.com/the-mytholog...

08.03.2026 06:34 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
The Mythology Of Conscious AI | NOEMA Why consciousness is more likely a property of life than of computation and why creating conscious, or even conscious-seeming AI, is a bad idea.

Nope

www.noemamag.com/the-mytholog...

08.03.2026 06:32 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

It’s literally efficient market theory vs gambler’s conceit

08.03.2026 06:23 👍 64 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 0

Taxes are too low

08.03.2026 06:14 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Oh, so they’ll carry malpractice insurance?

08.03.2026 06:11 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Yeah, Falklands discourse is cool, but Jim Jones was woke.

08.03.2026 06:09 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Like I’ve said a million times, voting is necessary but not sufficient.

08.03.2026 06:05 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Perjury is illegal. Fraud is illegal. Incitement to violence is illegal.

08.03.2026 06:03 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

If they’re citizens of the US, their right to vote has nothing to do with being Palestinian.

And no, Palestinian is an ethnicity, not a race. If it’s a race, French is also a race.

You’re flailing.

08.03.2026 06:02 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

I literally answered one just a few posts upthread

Try again.

bsky.app/profile/josh...

08.03.2026 05:59 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

No, and no one denied them the right to vote based on being Palestinian and American. You’re just making shit up.

08.03.2026 05:57 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

So, you hate waffles?

C’mon

08.03.2026 05:53 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

around the thesis that visual depictions influence behavior in break rooms, without any actual data collected, is more dishonest than my citing studies more directly connected to the claims.

08.03.2026 05:52 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

the large n & p testing, not effect size or consistency with the overarching claims of watchful eye effect.

The actual results of this study are stronger on much narrower claims than earlier watchful eye studies, & casting this as removing watchful eye from replicability concerns, especially

08.03.2026 05:52 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

real life rewards.

They got the most altruistic distribution by having participants imagine a flower, then seeing eyes, then imagining eyes, then seeing a flower.

The SD on all of them was larger than the difference in effects between modes or images.

The claim of “significance” is only with

08.03.2026 05:52 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0