Trending
Lloyd Sullivan's Avatar

Lloyd Sullivan

@lloydgonkillya

367
Followers
338
Following
453
Posts
12.11.2024
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Lloyd Sullivan @lloydgonkillya

Polymarket, Kalshi and all the rest of these prediction markets need to be wiped off the face of the earth. They provide absolutely nothing of value and are corrupting everything they touch.

13.03.2026 14:30 👍 5663 🔁 1314 💬 65 📌 27

I will never believe we're cooked. But I do think that a lot of leftists who consume a ton of social media need to ask how and why they end up repeating lightly laundered far-right discourse.

08.03.2026 01:39 👍 470 🔁 112 💬 13 📌 7

I think one thing to consider here is that Nazis frequently lie about their beliefs, and it is part of NYT ideology to never question whether someone is being honest about their self-reported political beliefs

13.03.2026 03:29 👍 481 🔁 69 💬 3 📌 2

Can you stop sanewashing Nazism? Thanks.

06.03.2026 20:55 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

This is why RAM is now expensive btw

03.03.2026 12:24 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

"But have you seen the grindset the construction workers have?" 🤑🐺📈🏦

02.03.2026 18:23 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

a lot of nazis are getting scratched

01.03.2026 21:16 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Never accidentally say "used cars" around your phone.

01.03.2026 17:55 👍 36 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 0

remember how the public decided to hate on glassholes?

01.03.2026 17:45 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Trump is bombing Iran the right way.

by Ezra Klein

01.03.2026 00:26 👍 1335 🔁 145 💬 35 📌 8

populism ☕

27.02.2026 01:49 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

I mean they were notorious for their media clout back in 2014. It's one of those things that IMO is overlooked when it comes to terrorist groups like ISIS.

26.02.2026 16:12 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Or future biodiesel plants. (Though I'm almost certain this was a sick joke)

25.02.2026 18:14 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
when a freedomcel says something so surveillancephobic you gotta hit them with the palantir stare

when a freedomcel says something so surveillancephobic you gotta hit them with the palantir stare

25.02.2026 17:54 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

The State of Israel is in some sense extremely lucky. Every time that they commit some sort of horrendous completely morally indefensible atrocity, an idiot online will say something so profoundly stupid and ahistorical about Jewish history that it instantly derails the conversation abt the atrocity

22.02.2026 16:33 👍 264 🔁 42 💬 7 📌 7

This has been a thing for a while.

22.02.2026 20:17 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

I don't have the long history of it, but research on this phenomenon of "search engine data voids", funded in part by some of the large search engine vendors, is between 7-10 years old now; and the problem only seems to have gotten worse by the intentional product design decisions of those companies

22.02.2026 18:31 👍 128 🔁 43 💬 3 📌 0
The political effects of X's feed algorithm
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10098-2
Received: 16 December 2024
Accepted: 4 January 2026
Published online: 18 February 2026
Open access
• Check for updates
Germain Gauthier,5, Roland Hodler?5, Philine Widmer35 & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya3,4,5 m
Feed algorithms are widely suspected to influence political attitudes. However, previous evidence from switching off the algorithm on Meta platforms found no political effects'. Here we present results from a 2023 field experiment on Elon Musk's platform X shedding light on this puzzle. We assigned active US-based users randomly to either an algorithmic or a chronological feed for 7 weeks, measuring political attitudes and online behaviour. Switching from a chronological to an algorithmic feed increased engagement and shifted political opinion towards more conservative positions, particularly regarding policy priorities, perceptions of criminal investigations into Donald Trump and views on the war in Ukraine. In contrast, switching from the algorithmic to the chronological feed had no comparable effects.
Neither switching the algorithm on nor switching it off significantly affected affective polarization or self-reported partisanship. To investigate the mechanism, we analysed users' feed content and behaviour. We found that the algorithm promotes conservative content and demotes posts by traditional media. Exposure to algorithmic content leads users to follow conservative political activist accounts, which they continue to follow even after switching off the algorithm, helping explain the asymmetry in effects. These results suggest that initial exposure to X's algorithm has persistent effects on users' current political attitudes and account-following behaviour, even in the absence of a detectable effect on partisanship.

The political effects of X's feed algorithm https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10098-2 Received: 16 December 2024 Accepted: 4 January 2026 Published online: 18 February 2026 Open access • Check for updates Germain Gauthier,5, Roland Hodler?5, Philine Widmer35 & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya3,4,5 m Feed algorithms are widely suspected to influence political attitudes. However, previous evidence from switching off the algorithm on Meta platforms found no political effects'. Here we present results from a 2023 field experiment on Elon Musk's platform X shedding light on this puzzle. We assigned active US-based users randomly to either an algorithmic or a chronological feed for 7 weeks, measuring political attitudes and online behaviour. Switching from a chronological to an algorithmic feed increased engagement and shifted political opinion towards more conservative positions, particularly regarding policy priorities, perceptions of criminal investigations into Donald Trump and views on the war in Ukraine. In contrast, switching from the algorithmic to the chronological feed had no comparable effects. Neither switching the algorithm on nor switching it off significantly affected affective polarization or self-reported partisanship. To investigate the mechanism, we analysed users' feed content and behaviour. We found that the algorithm promotes conservative content and demotes posts by traditional media. Exposure to algorithmic content leads users to follow conservative political activist accounts, which they continue to follow even after switching off the algorithm, helping explain the asymmetry in effects. These results suggest that initial exposure to X's algorithm has persistent effects on users' current political attitudes and account-following behaviour, even in the absence of a detectable effect on partisanship.

A new paper shows that less than 2 months of exposure to Twitter’s algorithmic feed significantly shifts people’s political views to the right.

Moving from chronological feed to the algorithmic feed also increases engagement.

This is one of the most concerning papers I’ve read in awhile.

19.02.2026 18:57 👍 6481 🔁 3242 💬 160 📌 410

When Jews become Nazis, they start parroting old racial antisemitic beliefs about the pathologically diseased Jewish body, but turning them onto themselves.

18.02.2026 20:51 👍 91 🔁 22 💬 9 📌 1

The real question is: Was there ever a Himyarite Talmudic mafia?

17.02.2026 01:58 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Chomsky engaged in manufacturing consent for narcissistic creeps with delusions of intelligence.

15.02.2026 22:59 👍 138 🔁 47 💬 1 📌 0

But if you want to be aware of an actual dogwhistle from Islamic extremists and even Baathists, it would be references to trees and stones. It's a reference to a notorious Hadith.

15.02.2026 20:51 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

A reference to the number of Muhammad's soldiers during the Battle of Badr, and the number of loyal followers of the Mahdi (tl;dr Islamic messiah) during a future armageddon. Generally, the Mahdi plays a more significant role in Shia Islam than it does in Sunni Islam.

15.02.2026 20:41 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

313 is basically a shia extremist red flag IMO

15.02.2026 20:35 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

‘The machine did it coldly’

Israeli intelligence sources reveal use of ‘Lavender’ system in Gaza war and claim permission given to kill civilians in pursuit of low-ranking militants

www.theguardian.com/world/2024/a...

15.02.2026 19:40 👍 10 🔁 9 💬 0 📌 1

I cannot fathom how idiotic this guy behaves.

15.02.2026 19:54 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Hasan going on a paid Chinese propaganda tour and then coming home to say that Democrats—one of if not *the* most pro-trans political party in the world—would shoot trans people for votes is beyond absurd

people like this should be heckled, bullied, and shamed every time they open their mouths

13.02.2026 00:17 👍 1098 🔁 220 💬 133 📌 116

Remember stadia?

02.02.2026 19:01 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

It is remarkable how bad investors are at understanding reality and allocating capital, and how much impact reactionary memetic thinking and newfangled hypebeast-ism has on the market.

02.02.2026 18:02 👍 103 🔁 23 💬 5 📌 3
Post image

We don’t owe them anything. They spent a decade ignoring obvious evidence implicating the most guilty while fabricating insane accusations against the innocent.

01.02.2026 21:44 👍 6934 🔁 1117 💬 106 📌 40