Lucas

If the stance reduces complexity in a useful, pragmatic way, then we are kinda authorized to ascribe agency to it.

I sympathize with that, but you kinda have no resource to respond to a person with a more greedy materialist position without invoking some substantives philosophicals commitments. Isn't it the gist of dennett ''intentional'' stance?

It can't be only the accessibility of information. It is something more like the ''care'' of the content. I think it was Benjamin who said that information is something conditioned by the present, but stories aren't. There is something like the erasure of the (need for, care for) story.

Someone more intelligent than me should think about it. There's something in the emergent culture of LLM usage that accelerates some trends that emerge with the internet. I don't know how to call it, the extent of it, but I can give an example: there's no more grandmother's secret recipe.

Maybe Habermas?

It's really difficult to think about a philosopher who reads more than Ricoeur.

Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity - Kindle edition by Korsgaard, Christine M.. Download it once and read it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Use features like bookmarks, note taking and highlighting while reading Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity.

Yes. In my house we read the bible every morning. www.amazon.com/Self-Constit...

I don't know if it answers you, but the problems cannot be in the trained data. So, in a deep sense, the model did solve them autonomously. 1stproof.org

Yep. I would add this caveat. And it won't move goal post. Thurston was talking about it in 1994, On Proof and Progress in Mathematics. Still, I ain't no matematician; grain of salt of what I said here.

Sim, é poético. Especialmente no episódio da "queda".

Infelizmente duvido demais disso.

Sem essa "cultura" de notas e estrelas, de A+ ou F, de 10 ou 0, em filmes e livros teríamos discussões muito mais interessantes.

Ozymandias continuaria sendo um ótimo episódio mesmo se a nota no IMDb fosse 5.0. IMDb tem uma tendência de ser estúpido: o melhor episódio de Pluribus tem 7.5.

O Letterboxed, por exemplo, seria muito mais interessante se não existissem as notas (stars), mas apenas os comentários.

I know that guy!

No, I mean you claim of impenetrability.

I want to read his new book, but I have no German knowledge. For god sack, my English is very limited. Maybe I enjoy Rödl because he is easy to understanding from a non native. Compare his prose with McDowell.

Do you mean Self-Consciousness & Objectivity?

Hollywood is so cooked.

I think the thread is saying: those mistakes aren't bugs but stem from the llm's stochastic-parrotic nature. The tricky easy questions just make visible the *feature*.

I mean, you guys have like a canonical list of bloggers.

The role of the blogger is beginning to be surpass by the podcast bros.

One funny thing for a foreign person about the political discourse in the usa is how much it is shape by bloggers.

Type 4: Furries

Type 3: LLM are useful and mind-blowing. Probably will not generalize super well across all activities. No way its conscious lmao. The technology will stand but ain't do what they are saying they will do.

Type 2: LLM are satanic. Zitron is Jesus Christ. OpenAI will drained the Nilo River. All response from ChatGPT was programmed by Sam Altman and underpaid Ethiopian people.

Type 1: People who like LLM very much (are aware about they risk). They go bananas if you say LLM are stochastic parrots.

Decretar que a física é um programa científico que se degenerou? Uau, você precisa ser surpreendente inteligente para ter uma visão tão abrangente do estado de coisas. Ainda mais não sendo um físico treinado! Mas não o pergunte o que é um parênteses de Poisson.

Não sei se sua pergunta foi retórica, mas para mim isso é simplesmente: dizer coisas surpreendentes sobre física é sinalizar como inteligente eu sou. A @acollierastro.bsky.social tem um vídeo sobre a fascinação dos bilionários em dizer que são bons em física.

Maybe you'll enjoy it. I'm from Brazil, and the ''hairy leg'' was a real thing. It was a way for some journalists to alert some minority people about violence from the military. That's why the arc from the leg is always connected and conducted by the corrupt cops.

Sometimes both. He surely could write better. He is very clear in other texts. He fears death profundly and maybe he just wants to publish the critiques before die.