It's not nonsense. It's lies. Call it what it is.

I asked Burrell what RW propoganda he thinks I was reading, he wouldn't answer the question.

I spoke to Graeme Burrell on Threads. He is a complete weirdo. I stated clearly how the proposed changes will impact disabled people in real terms, and he said I was reading too much RW propaganda and angrily said that he will block me if I continue to spread falsehoods. It was bizarre

If anyone can show me how you grow the economy by targeting people who need assistance to wash below their waist, please reply.

At the heart of every attack on disability benefits is the myth disabled people “get perks”: a free car, loads of cash, a life off work. It misrepresents the reality of disability, whilst exploiting low wages and high living costs to make the public envy people in daily pain.

And what about morally? Arbitrarily assigning another large round of cuts to disability on the fly the night before a national budget?

'Sharp knock on effects' meaning domino effect of life destroying state sanctioned barbarism

Why do you think it's funny to take the piss out of disabled people? MAGA are awful but calling a paralysed wheelchair bound man 'Hot Wheels' and laughing at it makes you look like as bad as them

Yes, it's quite telling.

'With the hope of minimal real impact'. 1.2million disabled people losing PIP, LCWRA, Carer's Allowance and Council tax reduction. The scale of this injustice if pushed through will ruin Labour for years. A Labour party that attacks disabled people is not a serious one.

Another question: How does it make sense that a disabled person who scored 8-12+ PIP points over a broad section of criteria fail to get PIP? The've demonstrated they have multiple issues. Why are multiple issue disabled people being cast adrift like their disabilties don't matter or are not costly?

Another question: How does it make sense that a disabled person who scored 8-12+ PIP points over a broad section of criteria fail to get PIP? The've demonstrated they have multiple issues. Why are multiple issue disabled people being cast adrift like their disabilties don't matter or are not costly?

It'll be stripped from everyone who fails to make the PIP 4pts in one descriptor requirement - Really difficult to get no matter how disabled you are - which in practical terms means potentially over a million disabled people suddenly having no no PIP, no LCWRA, no Carer's Allowance.

How does cutting PIP completely from disabed people 'provide for the genuine'?

I hadn't even thought of the council tax reductions. That'll be a quadruple blow to disabled people who fail to meet the new PIP requirements. Loss of PIP, LCWRA, carer's allowance AND council tax reductions. Have your party even thought this through?? It is utterly barbaric.

He's not an honourable man. He's proposing to cut 1.2million disabled people off PIP and further support to pay for what? Appeasing Trump and paying off bankrupt water companies? It's digusting, those are not the actions of an honourable man

It's plausible deniability. The less they officially know, the more they can lie

The American Right is literally just banning words that they don't like and people are still pretending they are pro freedom of speech

I think he's stupid and has no real interest in helping the economy, just himself

I smell 'Trump TVs' incoming..

Yes. Win win for Trump's US manufacturing donors because when the competition who pay tariffs have to raise their prices then they can undercut and/or raise their own prices thus increasing their profit margins. In that scenario everyone loses except his donors. And himself.

Does this explain why Trump really wants tariffs? To scare off his donor's competition and thus win them the larger market share in the US?

We don't do revolutions. When the French Govt increased their retirement age they had riots. When the Tories did it - Our older people voted for them.

The alienation should come when his agenda has and continues to have no positive material impact on the prosperity of his base. We saw this with the Tories. It's no guarantee though, as I've never seen this level of cultish lunacy in my lifetime. Cultists tend not to care about material reality.

We should claim to know it was one, on account of the fact the entire gesture was recorded on video. The first one, and the second one. That's pretty conclusive. Really weird take, telling people they shouldn't claim to know things they just saw with their own eyes.

Why have the Democrats become so spineless?

I just had a look and it appears she's blocked me? Weird. I've had no interaction with her nor do I think do we have any differences politically? Weird being blocked by a seminal songwriting artist of the 60s/70s

If your panel genuinely thinks Kuenssberg is the best interviewer then you have lost all credibility. If your idea of quality journalism is client journalism and obviously politically compromised partisan bias then you're not an outlet to be taken seriously.

The Right built a powerful, partisan, & participatory media environment to support its messaging, which offers a compelling "deep story" for its participants. The Left relied upon rigid, self-preserving institutional media and its "story" is little more than a defense of imperfect institutions.

It's nice on here. I am actually seeing people I want to see, I'm not being harrassed by the incessant thoughts of one E Musk, and I don't have that horrible gnawing feeling of losing faith in humanity. Also there's no t*ssers