daylight savings thyme's Avatar

daylight savings thyme

@thyme

she/her Iord of thyme

237
Followers
179
Following
2,232
Posts
23.06.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by daylight savings thyme @thyme

kind of insightful tbh

11.03.2026 21:52 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

that is also what these chatbots are, effectively. models.

11.03.2026 21:37 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

tbh I think most of the holograms were created on the spot using existing data

11.03.2026 20:35 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

honestly I think it was a fair bit of both. historical figures tended to be used as info bots more than conversation partners, but fictional characters were in holonovels meant to give people the chance to act out fantasies of being some sort of hero

11.03.2026 20:33 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

and "do those rights change based on whether we *know* the person" or how long they've been dead

11.03.2026 20:00 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

right, I mean, I think we've all thought something like that would be cool. but I'm curious why we've never questioned that kind of thing til now. what is it about it that doesn't raise that moral question

but yeah, "do the dead have rights" is ultimately the question

11.03.2026 20:00 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

right! but why was Star Trek comfortable with it? Why didn't Star Trek writers question it - what is it about famous people that made it feel intuitively okay, but living people felt questionable enough to get the sci fi moral quandary treatment?

11.03.2026 19:50 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

on the other hand, famous people still have family. If your deceased family member is famous, does that on its own give other people the right to create AI avatars of them?

11.03.2026 19:49 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I'm still not sure how I feel about that, even with famous people

11.03.2026 19:42 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

hence the question - are we going in a direction where "it's fine, but you have to wait til they've been dead for 50 years"?

11.03.2026 19:42 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

right - what's interesting to me is that these days we *are* seeing people argue that AI models of dead famous people is bad. I think I saw an article recently where a relative of a dead actor was saying that people have been sending her ai videos of their dead relative and was distressed by it

11.03.2026 19:41 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

yeah, I've heard good things - just never got around to it

11.03.2026 18:48 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

One of the main reasons I don't use AI is that you have to fact-check every single thing it gives you and by the time I do that, I could have just done the research myself.

03.03.2026 14:06 ๐Ÿ‘ 898 ๐Ÿ” 104 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 21 ๐Ÿ“Œ 5

I have not yet

11.03.2026 18:38 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Barclay and also Geordi had episodes about that, and it was also touched on briefly in DS9. again, about living people who they all eventually met

11.03.2026 18:36 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

i would genuinely like to talk about this

11.03.2026 18:06 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

so...idk. was star trek wrong. was data evil for creating his holographic scientists

11.03.2026 18:06 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

right! and...I think it's starting to bother people now. But it never bothered people when it was a hypothetical. which is fascinating.

11.03.2026 18:04 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

and I think what's interesting to me about this question is, again, that Star Trek writers didn't think to ask it when they could have.

and it also makes me wonder if we'll eventually see a sort of statute of limitations of, say, 100 years on using data to create an AI representation of someone

11.03.2026 18:03 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

or is it because it *does* feel intuitively fine to dehumanize someone who's effectively already dehumanized by their status as, like, famous/a symbol? Does generating an AI model of a famous person actually humanize them more?

11.03.2026 18:01 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

and it's curious to me that the creators never thought about the first scenario, whereas now I think people *are* skeptical of the idea of creating real people.

Is this because Star Trek was in a postcapitalist future where the question of exploiting someone's work wasn't as robust a question?

11.03.2026 18:01 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

okok I need to talk about this

Star Trek has effectively had AI versions of people for the entire time that it exists.

it's interesting to me that as a show, Star Trek never questioned whether that was unethical.

What they did question was the ethics of generating a hologram of someone living

11.03.2026 17:59 ๐Ÿ‘ 6 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 4 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

society if burgers came without cheese by default

04.03.2026 18:00 ๐Ÿ‘ 4 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

tbh this is why I've gotten so much out of swing dancing. it's a space where I can show up and I don't have to have conversations, but i can

04.03.2026 14:41 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

big mood

04.03.2026 14:41 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

doing a step tap while bouncing to the beat will work with basically any style of American popular music and most social dances at their simplest can be boiled down to that

04.03.2026 14:36 ๐Ÿ‘ 4 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

in fairness I only really go to designated partner dance stuff, which is a different vibe

but if you're out on the dance floor with friends at a bar/club or whatever, you can just step back and forth and feel the beat

04.03.2026 12:59 ๐Ÿ‘ 6 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

step tap step tap

04.03.2026 12:55 ๐Ÿ‘ 4 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

anyway i started death note today and i'm frankly shocked at how quickly it hooked me

02.03.2026 23:33 ๐Ÿ‘ 3 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

i keep thinking about watching more anime - i think all i've watched is mha, Naruto, and FMA brotherhood

02.03.2026 23:33 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0