Woops, here is the corrected
second one: doi.org/10.1093/ije/...
Hi both! Thanks for tagging me :) A couple from my team are: (1) doi.org/10.1093/aje/... (+ correction) (2) doi.org/10.1093/aje/... (perhaps more accessible) and (3) doi.org/10.1002/bimj... (perhaps more theoretical). We're also doing a virtual workshop for SER in Aug epiresearch.org/annual-meeti...
Summer school starts in less than a month - make sure you secure you spot soon!
Course details and links to register can be found here 👇 www.vicbiostat.org.au/short-courses
Start the year well by registering for the ViCBiostat Summer School 😊 👉 www.trybooking.com/events/landi...
Yes, no recording I’m afraid
ViCBiostat Summer School: Register now below so you don’t miss out on e.g. Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen’s causal inference course covering a range of topics in “quasi-experimental” approaches: difference-in-differences, instrumental variables, synthetic controls etc. #EpiSky #CausalSky
Incredibly honoured to receive the Rising Star Award at MCRI Staff Awards ✨ Thank you to my mentors, especially @margaritamb.bsky.social for championing the nomination, and to colleagues and collaborators @mcri.bsky.social who nominated me. Grateful to be part of such a supportive community 💛
Registrations now open for the ViCBiostat Summer School - Feb 13-20, 2026 (Melbourne/online)!
Features courses by local & international experts in causal inference, estimands, meta-analysis and cluster RCTs
Info: www.vicbiostat.org.au/short-courses
Register: www.trybooking.com/events/landi...
Mark your diaries! The ViCBiostat Summer School returns from 13-20 Feb 2026, in Melbourne and online.
Courses include causal inference, cluster randomised trials, meta-analysis and the estimand framework.
Further details TBA shortly - sign up to our mailing list at www.vicbiostat.org.au
#statistics
@cebu-melbourne.bsky.social @vicbiostat.bsky.social
@mcri.bsky.social @unimelb.bsky.social
A few weeks ago I went to Canberra to receive the Moran Medal at the lovely Shine Dome of the Australian Academy of Science (@science.org.au). It was a huge honour, and wonderful to hear talks from all corners of science and to learn about the Academy's great work supporting science
- pics below!
NEW PAPER!!! "Causal Machine Learning Methods and Use of Cross‐Fitting in Settings With High‐Dimensional Confounding"
led by Susie Ellul, with Stijn Vansteelandt & John Carlin
Published in Stats in Med
Check it out 👇
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...
#EpiSky #CausalSky
😄
Without getting into the Hume/Kant debate that Ivan raised above, if we focus on target trial emulations or actual trials, the estimand can indeed (though doesn't have to!) be defined as the effect in an ideal trial (per my other message, given the asymptotic result)
So specifying the components of the ideal trial (up to the contrasts) is an intuitive (but not necessary!) way of defining some causal estimands (but maybe not all of them!). And as I argue can help being clear about some things that are often forgotten in the math notation
I am not sure what you think my premise is, but as I explain in the paper under asymptotic conditions the ACE defined using potential outcomes is mathematically equivalent to the effect in an ideal trial randomizing the target pop to the two interventions of interest
My take on the addendum estimands (from afar), is that the approach overlooks causal identification assumptions (step 2 in my Figure 1) and suggests some estimands that are not actually proper (mathematically defined) defensivle estimands - they are more “analysis approaches”, ie skip steps 1 and 2
My 2 cents to clarifying links between formal causal inference and target and actual trials: arxiv.org/abs/2405.10026 @timpmorris.bsky.social @idiaz.bsky.social
@rush-099.bsky.social @cebu-melbourne.bsky.social @vicbiostat.bsky.social
NEW PAPER! (in press in EPIDEMIOLOGY)
Have you wondered:
- How to specify a target trial: as an ideal trial or something else?
- What biases do target trial emulations and actual RCTs share?
- How does it all relate to potential outcomes?
Read here! 👉 arxiv.org/abs/2405.10026
#EpiSky #CausalSky
🎯 TARGET Guideline published 🎉
TARGET is a reporting guideline for observational studies of interventions that use the target trial framework.
Over 3 years the @TARGETGuideline was rigorously developed and was co-published today in @jama.com & @bmj.com
doi.org/10.1001/jama.2025.13350
#episky
@ghazalehd.bsky.social @cebu-melbourne.bsky.social @vicbiostat.bsky.social
6/ And more: Impact of eliminating racial discrimination in reducing inequities in mental health and sleep problems among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children (tinyurl.com/5nej5vch)
5/ Even more examples: Impact of potential interventions to reduce postnatal depression (tinyurl.com/3ej5mee4) and mid-life mental health disorders (tinyurl.com/yy8jbpwr) in those with a history of mental illness
4/ More examples: Impact of potential interventions to reduce the heightened cancer risk in postmenopausal women with obesity (tinyurl.com/5b3kwjwk) and to reduce sex differences in melanoma cancer survival (tinyurl.com/57prtyr7)
3/ Examples: Impact of potential early childhood interventions to reduce socioeconomic disparities in children’s mental health (tinyurl.com/muttxx7j) and literacy skills (tinyurl.com/mvz8bxk8)
2/ The methodology uses interventional effects mapped to a “target trial” assessing the treatment strategies of interest, as proposed here tinyurl.com/yztb2hxs
1/ NEW R PACKAGE! For estimating the impact of potential interventions on multiple mediators in countering exposure effects (led by @cttc101.bsky.social)
- Paper👉 tinyurl.com/ye26jsps
- Package👉 tinyurl.com/yuh4kens
Thread shows published examples of how the method can be used! #EpiSky #CausalSky
NOW PUBLISHED! Featured article + 6 Commentaries + Rejoinder: “On the Uses and Abuses of Regression Models: A Call for Reform of Statistical Practice and Teaching” with my colleague John Carlin
tinyurl.com/2z2tmkhh
@cebu-melbourne.bsky.social @vicbiostat.bsky.social #EpiSky #CausalSky #StatsSky
📢 New Commentary: We discuss how analytic choices impact interpretation of studies on socioeconomic health inequities. We review 1) descriptive analogues of causal estimands (à la Young et al) with competing events; 2) timescale choice; and 3) covariate adjustment.
👉 academic.oup.com/aje/advance-...