Jacob is right. In fact, there is a recognised technique much the same as this for if you want to store bare-rooted plants for a few days (even weeks) before planting in their final positions. It's called 'heeling in'. Just try to get your tree replanted ASAP, before the growing season.
Nice high ceilings though. Presumably the displaced povs can go live up north somewhere.
"You cannot accommodate the terminally aggrieved"
Ain't that the truth?
Only true if you exclude King Kong.
Could you buy a campervan and travel full time for a while? That's something I've always wanted to do.
It doesn't tell us very much tbh. Could be a small minority repeatedly buying from multiple ads. Who knows?
A 12% return would be fantastic. Most ads get a fraction of 1%.
But this isn't saying ads on X get a 12% return. It's saying 12% of people have at some point bought from one of the thousands of ads they've seen in the history of using X.
He doesn’t care what you and I think. He just wants to muddy the water enough that the worst people won't listen to arguments against him.
I have some absolute shockers in my front hedge. Every spring I prune the hedge and curse them, saying I'll dig them out, but then in the summer they have the dearest little flowers and I promise them a reprieve!
You should research the long term health consequences of cross-sex hormones, and be grateful your childish urges were denied by people who knew better.
Evidently you don't understand the concept of *informed* consent.
I would say giving out life changing drugs on the basis of weak science is very much an indication of ideological bias.
Isn't pausing such a practice during the search for better data the rational path?
I guess she understands the concept of informed consent.
There are no 'respectable studies' that I've seen. There are some that didn't take into account comorbidities, particularly mental health related ones.
Suicides don't spike. Gender dysphoria usually desists.
There is no wrong puberty.
Pssh. As if you ever leave your bedroom.
You mean evidence.
Suicide rates might certainly form part of the evidence supporting the use of these drugs. The fact that such evidence doesnt exist should tell you something.
What possible objection could you have to the concept of evidenced based medicine? Honestly, wtf is wrong with you?
...but that would be a lack of Trump's integrity, not Starmer's.
Starmer has an obligation to defend British troops, and British and allied interests. I think he's taen exactly the right actions *so far*.
I agree it's a fine line, but refusing to strike back at the drone launch sites that attacked Akrotiri, or the missile sites that struck international airports in Kuwait and Dubai, would definitely send a very poor message.
Of course, Trump might now order offensive attacks from British bases...
A really cool thing about driving a 25 year old Land Rover is that I can run it on chip fat in times of global discord. That said, chip fat ain't getting any cheaper.
Presumably you aren't flying UK to NY via the Middle East though. Would be an excessively adventurous route.
That's a well-written and informative article, thanks.
I'd say it supports my view that Starmer has struck the appropriate balance between facilitating the defence of UK and allied interests without crossing into unlawful aggression.
There are conditions on the use of British bases; reactive strikes only. That's perfectly reasonable.
HMS Dragon may go to Cyprus, but hasn't yet departed. That's an air defence destroyer, not an offensive asset.
The aircraft carrier HMS Prince of Wales remains on elevated readiness in Portsmouth.
I rather like that he's kept us out of an illegal war...
Economy is doing okay too.
They're a type of ink cap I think.
An f16 without excess weight has a stall speed of around 185km/h, which is the same speed a Shahed flies at. And Shaheds arent tiny... 3.5m long.
