Elpis

Some of the relatively recent sprawl here does actually get to 2500-3000, but it does so by having a mid-rise component.

This isn't true, greenfield or previously-industrial mid/high density is easy to find.

I do not think it's reasonable to describe 3-5K/km^2 (which is the best you're going to get that way) as high-density.

Walkable SFH is still worse than 95% of mid/high-rise, though.

It is eight times higher here, which is a more reasonable level.

This is antisocial only if she's wrong, though.

It is kind of funny how all analogies you mention seem to make my personal reflexive opposition to coding LLM use make sense.

I cannot think of any I know, but I also don't really know any regardless of political orientation.

I think this is the last time someone won something with a plurality, not sure if the law has changed since.

Catching a plurality of the mice is also acceptable.

I am once again asking for a combined classical languages course (Latin/Greek/Sanskrit).

Felled by a stray arrow at the Battle of Ajnadayn.

I would argue that #8 is the only one that is unambiguously good without need of elaboration, though it's also overly specific.

One issue is flows have too many dimensions to represent concisely on a map, I think.

You can definitely make up for it with better transit, though.

Should also have a maximum level of allowed district residency.

I think focusing on commuting only is the wrong idea, a good system should be heavily used by non-commuters.

Las Vegas has straight vibes.

I feel like you need at least a couple decades of engineering lead time to do that from scratch.

I, like most people, would very much like to impose my aesthetic preferences on others, but I'm not stupid enough to think that any movement that actually wants majority approval should do so.

I have ideological sympathies for the blob but most people in this category do not have that excuse.

This is a bad example because you were factually correct, though.

What they don't tell you about the Australian bush is how many random wild goats there are.

I support the existence of billionaires conceptually but not the ones we actually have.

He wasn't wrong, though.

The way around this is to go A-B-A-B.

It also has capsicum taste, though (as a chilli hater this is the only part I like).

Or more narrowly it is uncouth to win in any way that can be seen as dishonourable or unusual.

I assume it's just not very well-known, I hadn't heard of it until Sarah mentioned it (on a previous occasion).

Not that unreasonable, to be fair, there are only ~fifty US cities of that size or larger.