Nicolette Glazer

Judge Hendrix's No TX decision (which Haines endorces in full) is here: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

CourtListener Create alerts, search for and browse the latest case law, PACER documents, judges, and oral arguments. Updated automatically with the latest court documents. An initiative of Free Law Project.

Judge Haines 'all is good in claiming invasion' decision is here: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

This is very important coz (2) is the current incarnation of AARP case which is still sitting on SCOTUS emergency docket.

With a split on both the Proclamation and class vs individual habeas, SCOTUS is much more likely to step into this now.

🚨 BREAKING: Major developments in the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) legal saga:

1. PA fed judge is 1st to find that POTUS has authority to issue a proclamation under AEA to remove Venezuelans declared members of TdA.
2. TX fed judge refused to issue class certification under AEA for No District of TX

Immigration Policy Q&A with Nicolette Glazer Esq, Ask questions about immigration law and join an honest discussion about Immigration policy, news, and impact lawsuits with Nicolette Glazer Esq.

Join me live on Wednesdays at 11:30 AM (PST). I'll also post the recordings at youtube.com/@NicoletteGl...

chilling reporting on cruelty of blind and made-for-TV ICE enforcement action: 18 yo Venezuelan paroled in Nov via CBPOne was arrested in Jan when his mom allowed ICE into their house after being told that ICE was looking for him for appearing in a 'video w guns and drugs' kut.org/politics/202...

That said, under the Immigration and Nationality Act a person can request asylum at POE (courts have ruled that metering is unlawful) and asylum cannot be halted by executive action, so stay tuned for the executive orders for details as to what actions under 212(f) would be taken by Prez Trump.

About 25+ people who had received notices for such appointments for post 20 Jan and early February will not be able to use them and no new appointments will be made available.

The CBPOne app feature allowing ppl to get an appointment for processing at POE has been officially discontinued per
@el_reportero

CONFIRMED! USCIS will issue refund for the filing fees for all who filed for the Parole in Place Program, Keeping Families Together, that was blocked by TX court.

People will not receive a formal denial I was told, which is very strange.

HUGE if true! On one of the listservers a colleague posted that they received a refund check for the #KFT (the now dead Keeping Families Together pogram) application filed for a client.

Can anyone confirm that this is happening? We have not received any so far.

9. I have many issues w ceBONDS system (problems are many, too many for a thread).

Our firm does not post ceBONDS and this rule just confirms my initial reaction when they started it.

What is your experience/reaction?

8. -- a USC/LPR who posted the bond is not likely to update their address with ICE everytime they move. And the bene changing address has no relevance.

Ergo, the problems with the current system are likely to be magnified over the next 4 years.

7. again problematic bc most individuals posting immigration bonds are not the subject of the bond & delivery and supervision bonds remain in place sometimes in decades

6. Obligors who opt out of e-service will receive notice by routine mail it seems which is a departure from the current "certified receipt" practice for paper delivery/breach notices.

5. alleged "safeguard" where e-service is not confirmed, meaning recipient does not click on the link, which is ICE must effectuate service via regular mail to the obligor's last know address is utterly insufficient, considering ICE prevalent failure to actually print and mail notices of any kind.

4. Institutional obligors log in & out of accnts often & receive many e-notifications to check activities. Any errant opening of notice -- will be considered valid proof of service-- triggering the delivery obligations: If the non-citizen does not appear bond is breached &$ are gone (revert to ICE).

3. Reason is because only individuals who are US Citizens or LPRs can be individual obligors.

2. But the majority of obligors/co-obligors posting in ceBONDS are institutional obligors such as NGOs and law firms. (I think sureties use a different account but not sure about it). So those institutional obligors post immigration bonds for many individuals.

1. I'm particularly concerned abt provision/system providing that to confirm/constitute "proof of service" of an e-bond notice, system captures exact date/time notices are opened. That is it -it dosnt matter who opened it, whether had legal authority to opt out/in or use th account.

as the Reg also clarifies that there is a difference between "notification" (ppl need to opt in to use ceBONDS) and "notices" under this new rule, which is HUGE but will see if Trump Admin changes it and will be potentially a trap for the unwary going forward. Why?

This rule is enacted to allow ICE to serve certain bond notices (delivery, cancellations etc) electronically 2 obligors who **consent to electronic service**, meaning that it should not apply to anyone who has posted a bond previously ...

🚨NEW! ICE is to publish the Final Rule on Electronic Immigration Bond Notifices on Monday, 1/6/2025, which will take effect 45 days later. #usimmigration

This rule does not amend or change the ceBONDS system in any way!

Copy is here: public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2024-31358.pdf

A short 🧵

‎Notifica App ‎Makes it easier for you to access to your notifications and communications with the Public Administrations. The Ministry of Economic Affairs and Digital Transformation offers you the

is the 'Panic Button" app the Mex Gov't is talking about --to allow people in danger of ICE detention/deportation -- a new version of the Notifica App? If so, it will likely be a bust.
apps.apple.com/us/app/notif...

is the 'Panic Button" app the Mex Gov't is talking about to allow people in danger of deportation/detention a new version of the Notifica App?
apps.apple.com/us/app/notif...

I doubt they would have such capability but if they are upping consular staff they can set up effective document depository for rapid response legal teams. It will be on the communities & legal profession to do it.

I know someone here is in the beta testing sample, so plz show us what they're cooking, plz.

But as a publicity and messaging tactic, it is a 💯. Let's see what Homan's response will be, but my concern is that it could motivate ICE to target disproportionally Mexican citizens and victimize the border communities.

it is supposed to be available in January.

How far they could go in securing or coordinating legal representation is a murky area, and certainly, anything that could be seen as interfering with ICE enforcement actions would be out of bounds as it would be an interference with a sovereign's police powers.

But consular staff and officials have ZERO authority to prevent ICE detention or to take actions to shield, represent, or protect their nationals against ICE enforcement actions such as arrest, detention, and deportation.