Richard Schwartz's Avatar

Richard Schwartz

@schwartziswithyou

148
Followers
116
Following
30
Posts
15.11.2024
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Richard Schwartz @schwartziswithyou

Post image

Inspired by @andrewkostrub.bsky.social

25.10.2025 14:17 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Post image
25.10.2025 14:16 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Video thumbnail

I told you we’d be back

12.06.2025 16:15 👍 42804 🔁 12642 💬 1562 📌 5131

The Schwartz will be with you. At least this one will be.

12.06.2025 19:17 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Over years, I have a few times called Musk a liar (across the country by 2016, then 2017) and thief (money for upgrades), on national TV even. Maybe that’s why my Twitter account has been blocked for a few months despite violating no rules. I can’t get it fixed.

15.02.2025 23:33 👍 623 🔁 101 💬 37 📌 11

No idea about Hegseth -- but I would not consider those to be hallmarks of ChatGPT. 1) Lots of software converts two consecutive dashes to an em-dash; 2) I use semicolons; 3) Sometimes I use a), b), c), and sometimes I use numbers.

27.03.2025 21:19 👍 9 🔁 1 💬 4 📌 0
Post image
25.03.2025 17:19 👍 0 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0
Post image
25.03.2025 17:20 👍 6 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0

The latest crazy just proves what we all know. They are discussing everything on Signal to avoid any discovery or FOIA or archival laws. So illegal but here we are.

24.03.2025 18:56 👍 47549 🔁 11758 💬 816 📌 544
Preview
Pm Private GIF ALT: Pm Private GIF

I would like to nominate Maxwell Smart for national security advisor.

25.03.2025 01:32 👍 76939 🔁 16929 💬 3030 📌 1610

Everyone in chat: Failure to preserve official records due to the use of an unapproved commercial messaging app with an automatic timed deletion feature. (44 U.S.C. 31 - Federal Records Act)

25.03.2025 01:17 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Waltz: Inviting a reporter into a national security principals chat. (Is there a U.S. Code reference for criminal stupidity?)

25.03.2025 01:08 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Everyone in chat: Failing to report and secure the classified information that was transmitted and received (18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material)

25.03.2025 01:07 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Everyone in the chat: Mishandling classified information by participating in a national security principals group chat using personal or government devices on an unapproved commercial message app (18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material)

25.03.2025 01:06 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Hegseth: Leaking classified information (18 U.S. Code § 798 - Disclosure of classified information)

25.03.2025 01:05 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

немыслимо

04.03.2025 01:20 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Post image

As of today, a new term has entered our language. A “rubio” is a spineless lump of nothing. Example: Don’t be such a rubio.

01.03.2025 04:03 👍 67652 🔁 14430 💬 3077 📌 1208

He won't just keep his job. He'll get a promotion.

20.02.2025 04:25 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Only if they can unlock it, which gives them the key to decrypt local storage.

16.02.2025 19:24 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

I have a Proton account that I set up a long time ago, but I've never advertised the address or considered switching to it as my primary. It's just reserved for if/when I need to send something that must be end-to-end encrypted, which hasn't happened yet.

16.02.2025 16:49 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

And smartphone clients were not a thing back then, so I never thought through what the implications would be.

16.02.2025 16:48 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Hmmm... Does that mean that the data is unencrypted on the phone? Or does the index use your encryption key to decrypt, build the index entries, and encrypt the index entries? At eVelocity we were very interested in end-to-end encryption and we faced a similar problem -- for users and support.

16.02.2025 16:47 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

3/3 May 20th, 1875 is referenced in the current ISO-8601 standard, but that is just short of 150 years ago, not "over 150" years ago. The standard states that dates before 1875 (when the "Convention du Mètre” was signed) all the way back to 10,000 BCE can be represented in ISO-8601 format.

15.02.2025 21:00 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

There may be some truth in it somewhere, but (a) the epoch date in COBOL is 1601 not 1875, and (b) there is no such thing as an ISO 8601 standard for numeric dates. ISO-8601 is a standard for text representation of dates (for unambiguous display or interchange), not numeric representation.

15.02.2025 20:59 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Post image

1/3 This is popping up all over my feed. I am skeptical.

15.02.2025 20:58 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0

AI-generated, for sure.

09.02.2025 17:31 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

But no, I have not found any additional info about this.

08.02.2025 20:53 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Post image
08.02.2025 17:55 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

The square of the hippopotamus equals the square of the other two... I forget the rest. ;-)

08.02.2025 16:45 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

The account was @senatorhassan1.bsky.social.

07.02.2025 22:33 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0