Λriane Two ☑️

there is great variation among summer's days.

@haskell.org I need your opinion on this.

Is there not the the stabbing the food lustlessly with a fork while taking small bites in a distinterested slow way kind of eating?

gcc and clang can do it. They even have a special attribute musttail which causes compilation to fail if the compiler cannot figure out how to do tail call optimization.

No, it is literally a program that prints "Could not compile <filename>: Unknown error." for every input.

314 instructions? Pi day is tomorrow.

I actually skipped reading over the post where he actually linked the article "The US-Canadian Road Safety Gap Is Getting Wider".

I will make a language where the code never compiles and never works. Much simpler.

why does the US have that much more deaths when Canada and Australia also have built car dependant suburbs.

Can anyone explain to me why it is annoying, is it about overflow? is it about promotion rules? would having no negative integer literals and unary minus still be a problem in a different language with saner implicit conversions and overflow handling?

zeolite

In general I find this thing mildly annoying with its pseudo-space bullshit nature.
The labelling is subtlely wrong: Arrow labeled imaginary unit points to pi, the arrow pointing to zero labelling it multiplicative identitiy...
I begin to suspect that it is AI generated.

Trained a Neural Net

xkcd.com/2173/

When can a small individual download books and movies for "AI training". I want free books too.

why is -1 and 1 not on the real axis.

I was argueing against the general principle not the specific case anyway.

to being parsed in parallel. Allegedly Zig has no multiline comments (/* */) so they could tokenize lines independently.

I don't think Zig is a great example (also I don't know Zig), but I think one could design a language with a syntax which can be parsed in a multithreaded way.

Not quite.
C does not have context free grammar because typedef'd struct pointers and multiplication look the same.
C's include mechanism causes header files to be parsed multiple times the way it is used in a lot of large projects.
Modern performance is different, C's syntax does not lend itself

STEM: straight trans eunuchs metrosexual
LGBT: linguistics geography biology technology

*definitely

I like waffles. They are delicious.

Yes, that is definetly a dunk and not a criticism.
I can see the difference.

How am I supposed to know whether your labelling is accurate, I don't even know what the so called "C++ hater" wrote originally.

I guess any criticism towards a useful tool is now automatically invalid by the fact that you can make cool stuff with it.

So I can't ,for instance, criticise Windows Notepad having Copilot integration, because people have done cool stuff with Windows.

> I've got to wonder what it'd take to bridge that gap.

Understanding the psychology behind it and taking actions in the right direction.

This will increase security because people with short passwords will feel embarrassed and quickly change to use a longer password.

It is not truly open source unless you use telnet so that people can read the code in transit.

pretending? approximating?

a bright sunny sky, the perfect weather for building a pyramid.

flashgaming.fandom.com/wiki/Bloxorz
(Available at the ad infested browser game sites of your choice)

I guess there will be some polyhedra with constricted polyhedra nets and weird gaps, so it won't be straightforward anyway. Maybe if the player polyhedra can morph between shapes...