Misato

It's still highly suspect to me. But either way I removed the mention of your profile name and I respect your decision to disengage from my posts.

You deserve your access to the internet being restricted and your voice on the matter of child safety being disregarded as untrustworthy.

I'm not giving you a second chance so don't ask for it. Typically people don't need two tries to get that you shouldn't engage in soliciting CSAM. Log off.

I'll tag a public profile all I want if you keep putting yourself in my radar like this. Stay in your lane. I absolutely don't want anybody who has abused their access to the Internet like you have ever in my court. I don't fuck with you.

Also, it appears you only created this account and followed me after I had coincidentally asked Nuppy to stop their interaction with my post.

Regardless, I want nothing to do with anybody engaged with this MAP to "child safety" advocate community. I only post so outsiders can steer clear

This account was created using Annie as a namesake at the exact same time and using the exact same verbiage and tone that Nuppy was engaging in. There were also references to a shell account being created by Nuppy.

I've taken the post with your name down for now, but I still suspect this is a shell account for one of the actors here. The reason being that you've posted this message ~ same time that 'Nuppy' doxxed Annie Gal.

You also found my message, followed me and reposted my message at the same time

This is an internal dispute between harmful actors, not advocacy, and it has involved interactions reaching outside their conflict.

Be aware I am not aligned with Annie, Nuppy, or anyone connected to them. I am sharing this only so others understand the context and can make informed decisions.

Both individuals, Annie and 'Nuppy' are now presenting themselves as child safety or anti-CSA advocates while exposing and publicizing details of each other’s past behavior in ways that appear tied to reputation management rather than genuine accountability.

Annie publicized details involving victims associated with this individual as part of an effort to distance herself from prior harmful affiliations. This appears to have angered 'Nuppy', leading to ongoing retaliation and proxy interaction spilling into unrelated spaces.

Guardian System – AnnieGal (Stop KOSA) (@kodochara.bsky.social) and this actor come from the same MAP community and are currently engaged in an internal fallout. This has led to 'Nuppy' attempting to co-opt any and all community safety warnings regarding Annie.

When you are so predatory that you get uninvited to the pedo party for being too creepy, that's when you know you are an absolute chop.

Checked your post history, and I know you aren't here for any reason other than the one I just listed above. Take you and Annie's lover spat elsewhere.

Do not interact with me.

I have no interest in speaking with members of Annie Gal's community, like yourself, who took advantage of the close proximity to minors her server provided you with to harm them.

This post is not your get out of jail card.

If you followed/found my profile and are expecting more posts I likely will not be posting. I am a private person. I would rather have a blank profile as social media really drains me, but I felt the need to leave this up as I am tired of seeing people harass survivors like me with no consequence.

Please use caution engaging with this account and report it for harassment, stalking, and the publication of sexual violence details involving a CSA survivor.

Additionally, Annie is operating through a proxy account, apparently to avoid consequences for prior platform violations, including content that violated Bluesky’s sexual content rules regarding minors.

This is harassment. This is retraumatization. This is dangerous behavior.

This content is being published through Annie’s public blog, which she appears to be profiting from, while leveraging the victim’s trauma for engagement.

-publicly posting details of the victim’s sexual assault

-publicly sharing alleged private sexual interests or “fetishes”

-repeatedly claiming the victim is “in love with her”

-engaging in ongoing baiting and provocation to force attention or response

The targeted individual has made it clear she wants no contact. Friends and family have also directly requested that Annie leave her alone. Despite this, Annie has continued to escalate harassment and has repeatedly published invasive content about the victim, including:

Despite that rebrand, she is actively stalking, harassing, and obsessively targeting an individual who is approximately ten years younger and has a documented history of childhood sexual abuse.

This individual has previously publicly self-identified as anti-contact MAP, and is now branding herself as an anti-CSA activist, and consistently putting herself into contact with minors and victims of CSA online claiming to help them.

Community Safety Warning:

I want to make the community aware of a serious pattern of behavior from the Bluesky account:

Guardian System - AnnieGal (Stop KOSA)
@kodochara.bsky.social

Please see thread 🧵 TW: CSA

Funny how this is exactly what you are saying now about her in our current thread.

You took the control of the narrative out of the victims hands. It's quite disgusting of a thing to do. Healing from trauma is about taking back control of your own body and narrative. And you controlled the way her body was written about, and you continue to publish your version of her voice now.

You took the control of the narrative out of the victims hands. It's quite disgusting of a thing to do. Healing from trauma is about taking back control of your own body and narrative. And you controlled the way her body was written about, and you continue to publish your version of her voice now.

It wasn't just that article. There were multiple. And you know that it is wrong to reveal or write about someone else's sexual trauma and even mention their fetishes without their explicit input and consent. There is no excuse.

You leaked details about her sexual life on your blog. I read them. You used other articles on unrelated individuals to segway into discussing dusk endlessly. She does not even possess these fetishes you claimed either by her own admission. And it was you just today that mentioned them again.

You are not a person who it is safe for Dusk to go to. You should stop advertising yourself as such.

You admit you are mean to her, for one. You consistently claim online that she is in love with you but doesn't realize it yet (who is the stalker here again?) you are dishonest in your intentions.

You're still Kiwifarms in this situation. This doesn't absolve the harm you are doing unless you are trying to suggest Kiwifarms did nothing wrong, just joke around. Lol

When someone says no you take no as an answer. You don't get to decide whether their rejection of you is honest or not (spoiler: it is in this case. read the writing on the wall)

If someone says NO, I don't want to be around you, they owe you *nothing* and you need to stop trying to pull them back.

You're suggesting she's lying about not being in love with you?

Do you realize how this sounds?