Lol. That seems to be a natural human response Ive seen all over social media and UFO forums for years. Its gradually changing for the better, but we have a loooong way to go.
27.02.2026 17:35
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Lol. That seems to be a natural human response Ive seen all over social media and UFO forums for years. Its gradually changing for the better, but we have a loooong way to go.
genasys.com/lrad-product...
A handheld version does exist. I agree they are not the same as helicopter assault technology…just still not ‘UFO woo woo’.
Before social media, numerous contactees came forward with positive messages for humanity on how we can get our ish together. Now we seem far too focused on calling those who come forward liars, grifters, and charlatans without even remembering what they actually said. This too will pass.
Good points yet there can and is truth to both LRAD and what you’re stating here. Both exist at the same time. Neither are really UFO woo-woo stuff.
Here, I was resetting the view once the moon cleared the frame, but got distracted by a text before I finished. Before I was able to completely reset the view, a cylindrical shaped object crosses the frame.
I was zoomed in fairly closely, and there were no ‘bugs’ flying close to the camera.
m.youtube.com/watch?v=Cgaq...
Rod - Cylindrical Shaped UFO-UAP While Filming the Moon
Time: 6:54pm - 31 October 2025
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Recording device: Nikon P900
Inclination: appx 36 degrees
Focal Length: appx 420 mm
“What does this mean for religion?”
It means we are going to finally understand what ‘religion’ actually is, where it came from, and why. For starters, religion was meant to teach, and never meant to be used to subjugate others.
Good points here. Also, try to shoot in ‘landscape’ mode if at all possible, so that more of the total view is included. Portrait mode leaves out 2/3 of the total view.
Asserting people are ‘mistaken’, mis-communicating and swayed by folklore doesn’t explain who the woman was, what the box was, nor any other details of the event.
Excellent read.
Gotcha. Thanks. Have a nice weekend.
I dont know what insisting you’re talking about. I merely explained that UAP was more accurate. I use both terms, so its you who is doing the gaslighting now. As far as aliens, no one is forcing you to believe anything. Each in his own time.
UAP is a more accurate description of what many people are encountering, and doesn’t automatically mean ‘alien’. We’ll be fine.
Where is the rest of your thread?
I know you mean well, but everyone is on their own journey with this very complex topic, so I feel its difficult to say who is being uncritical or when…especially when your examples are so general and non-specific.
Ill have to read up on the topics you mentioned. Thanks anyway. Have a nice weekend
Thats what I was doing. Asking you what the facts were. Or at least the main bullet points. And telling me JM is a hoaxer doesn’t mean anything unless you tell me what he hoaxed. Not trolling you but just asking for specifics. Can be very confusing for a newcomer.
Could you be more specific about any of those you mentioned? What specifically is untrue or a hoax about any of them? Could you just pick one and provide an example of why its a hoax? I dont know much about any of them so just asking questions.
Please DM a link. I’ve filmed several uap, study the patterns, and find value in making comparisons to other videos.
Thanks.
Can you describe how it moved? Thanks.
None of that mentions a specific data point shared by him, but like I said…never mind.
No doubt. Even in the 40s with the foo fighters. But his Disclosure Project was the first major conference in our time.
I still haven’t heard what specifically folks disagree with him about, but no biggie. Never mind.
Anything? Im neither pro Greer nor anti Greer, but he DID say pilots and military have had encounters and we should take them seriously=>and now we’ve had hearings.
The question was about specificity. What specifically has he said you dont agree with?
I see this claim constantly on social media, and while I totally agree with you, people are rarely specific. What vague ideas? It would help everyone to be specific about at least one, and then folks can discuss from there. Could you mention one please? Thanks.
We lived about 200 miles away from where this happened when I was a kid. Ill never forget the nightly news reports and the hysteria of people thinking this was all made up. Walton has never changed his story to this day.
Truth.
Even those most interested in the topic accept only so much. They want to discuss it, but then suddenly DONT want to discuss it when faced with anecdotal evidence of ETs. “There’s no evidence!” they scream. This wouldnt even be a topic of discussion at all w/o anecdotal evidence.
The info is in the yt video description, but just forget about it. Have a good week.
…more we’ll all learn. Anyway. Thanks for your input. Ill try to include as much data as possible with my captures, will continue to ‘write’ about it regardless of ridicule, and continue to contribute in the best way I know how. Take care.
…is certainly not my first rodeo, and despite Teodorani’s youtube bias in 2009, there a quite a few uap captures by the public which are real, not fakes or cgi, and which have become more prominent over time more regular folks have sightings. The more we observe, compare and ASK QUESTIONS, the…
…on focus, I don’t post them at all. I am one of very few people who try to digitally zoom in while editing so as to show the best representation of what they look like closeup. But its not perfect, and I know it wont translate to some…especially to those who have never had a sighting. This…
…while your site focuses on pilot reports, my research and personal experience comes from ground observation. I cannot plan the sightings and have mostly captured using an iphone, but have been able to film a few with a Nikon P900 or with a Canon FS300 (LA-March 2019)
If the objects aren’t …