Niklas Buergi's Avatar

Niklas Buergi

@niklasbuergi

Postdoctoral researcher @ MPI for Biological Cybernetics Social inference, decision-making, & computational psychiatry https://www.niklasbuergi.com/

95
Followers
251
Following
10
Posts
22.10.2024
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Niklas Buergi @niklasbuergi

Some nice coverage here of our study published in @biologicalpsych.bsky.social CNNI on structure learning and uncertainty in compulsivity

πŸ“ƒ Paper available here - www.biologicalpsychiatrycnni.org/article/S245...

09.03.2026 11:30 πŸ‘ 11 πŸ” 5 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Thrilled that this first empirical paper out of the lab is posted, led by Sandarsh Pandey, asking:

Depression (and other internalizing disorders) involve profound changes to sense of self. How can we study these differences using rigorous decision-making methods?

(alt link: tinyurl.com/2kk59dje)

06.03.2026 17:38 πŸ‘ 71 πŸ” 28 πŸ’¬ 4 πŸ“Œ 1

Thanks for sharing our work!

For anyone interested, here's a short thread summarizing the main takeaways:

bsky.app/profile/nikl...

09.03.2026 23:59 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

What can rock-paper-scissors tell us about what I think that you think that I'm thinking? Check out this cool work to find out!

πŸ€›πŸ€›πŸ“„

09.03.2026 12:23 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

A new study reveals what brain networks govern social mentalization and adaptation, making it possible to predict how flexibly one person reacts to others.
Published in @natneuro.nature.com

πŸ‘‰ www.econ.uzh.ch/en/news/rese...

09.03.2026 14:27 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 3 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

πŸ“£ New publication πŸ“£

Very excited to share our new paper "A neural signature of adaptive mentalization" out now in Nature Neuroscience (the project started all the way back in 2018!); with
@niklasbuergi.bsky.social
@drgokhanaydogan.bsky.social
@christianruff.bsky.social

(1/4)

09.03.2026 10:32 πŸ‘ 25 πŸ” 8 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Neurocomputational mechanisms of adaptive mentalization in humans β€˜Theory of mind’ (ToM) is classically investigated with β€˜static’ inference tasks, which miss the dynamic nature of social interactions. In a recent article, Buergi, Aydogan, and colleagues combined co...

For another perspective, see this TICS Spotlight by Toan Nong, Jun Feng, and Jean-Claude Dreher - many thanks for discussing our work!

www.cell.com/trends/cogni...

09.03.2026 10:08 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

This work was done with @drgokhanaydogan.bsky.social, @arkadykonovalov.bsky.social, and @ccruff.bsky.social at @zne-uzh.bsky.social @econ.uzh.ch .

Many thanks to our reviewers which helped significantly strengthen the manuscript!

09.03.2026 10:08 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Remarkably, predictive accuracy remained high even for participants from an independent, demographically more diverse dataset.

This suggests that the pattern reflects a robust and generalizable neural signature of adaptive mentalization.

09.03.2026 10:08 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

But neither of these regions is specific to adaptive mentalization.

What if we revert the question and ask if we can predict it from neural activity?

Using machine learning, we identified a distributed neural signature that predicted adaptive mentalization with high accuracy.

09.03.2026 10:08 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Crucially, our model quantifies participants’ trial-level insight about the other’s strategy, prompting a revision of their own mentalization strategy.

This adaptive belief update was encoded in key hubs of the social brain network, in particular the right TPJ and the anterior insula.

09.03.2026 10:08 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

We found that almost everyone adapted their belief inference to their opponents, using both human and artificial opponents.

Our novel Cognitive Hierarchy Assessment (CHASE) model captures the underlying cognitive processes and outperformed existing models in predicting behavior.

09.03.2026 10:08 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Here, we provide a neurocomputational account of such adaptive mentalization, by building on the recursive reasoning / level-k framework (I think that you think that…).

Participants played repeated βœŠβœ‹βœŒοΈ-games, where the only way to win above chance is predicting the other’s next move.

09.03.2026 10:08 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Several studies have begun to illuminate how the brain implements belief inference strategies.

But people reason differently - so successful mentalization requires adapting to the strategy of the interaction partner!

09.03.2026 10:08 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
A neural signature of adaptive mentalization | Nature Neuroscience

How does the brain decide which mental strategy to use when inferring others' beliefs?

Excited to (finally!) see my first first-author paper out @natneuro.nature.com

Summary below 🧡 #CogSci #CogNeuro

www.nature.com/articles/s41...

09.03.2026 10:08 πŸ‘ 70 πŸ” 24 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 3
Preview
Deciding for others alters metacognition leading to responsibility aversion Making decisions on behalf of other people reduces decision confidence, which leads to responsibility aversion.

Happy to share my first first-author paper, new in Science Advances: Deciding for others alters metacognition leading to responsibility aversion www.science.org/doi/10.1126/... #ScienceAdvancesResearch @zne-uzh.bsky.social @econ.uzh.ch

25.02.2026 19:50 πŸ‘ 21 πŸ” 11 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 1
Hans Berger and an EEG recording

Hans Berger and an EEG recording

🧠 What if you could see thoughts?

When Hans Berger recorded the first human EEG, many scientists didn’t believe him. Today, EEG is one of neuroscience’s most important tools.

The story behind it is fascinating: πŸ‘‡
www.kyb.tuebingen.mpg.de/berger

05.03.2026 13:48 πŸ‘ 7 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

πŸ“£ New book chapter

Excited to see my chapter "The Neural Mechanisms of Strategic Decision-Making" finally out in a new book, "Neuroeconomics: Core Topics and Current Directions", edited by @dvsmith.bsky.social, @thepsychologist.bsky.social, and Dominic Fareri.

link.springer.com/chapter/10.1...

02.02.2026 13:44 πŸ‘ 15 πŸ” 4 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Probability weighting arises from boundary repulsions of cognitive noise In both risky choice and perception, people overweight small and underweight large probabilities. While prospect theory models this with a probability weighting function, and Bayesian noisy coding mod...

πŸ“’ Preprint out! biorxiv.org/content/10.1... What gives rise to probability weighting, a cornerstone of Prospect Theory?
We show it comes from the natural boundedness of probabilities + cognitive noise. Adding boundaries adds multiple distortions, across risky choice & perception.

16.09.2025 09:14 πŸ‘ 22 πŸ” 12 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 2
Post image

πŸ€”How do humans anticipate an opponent's moves in strategic games?

Excited to share our latest work on #mentalization in strategic games.
After years of work, we've empirically validated our new model, behaviorally (N~500) and neurally (N~100) 🧠 a 🧡 (1/5)

24.11.2024 16:29 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0