a man wearing a black jacket and a white ruffled tie
ALT: a man wearing a black jacket and a white ruffled tie
Unfortunately not as much debate and introspection as it should...
The unfortunate saga underlined one important thing for most scientists...don't rock the boat, don't upset the applecart, don't derail the gravy train..for you will pay severe consequences if you do.
10.03.2026 19:29
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
At what point do we accept/proclaim that decision to take up a job dependent a lot or entirely on federal funding for science was/is the worst decision ever
Asking for a friend
05.03.2026 01:57
π 7
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Ask and ye shall receive
02.03.2026 21:47
π 2
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Check Date
26.02.2026 13:38
π 1
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
suggested edit: Harvard does 1 right thing
26.02.2026 13:37
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
The back story of Jurassic Park
16.02.2026 21:19
π 7
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
"Science talks need to be bettered - but more like a Taylor Swift show"
12.02.2026 12:44
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
This is how far we have fallen.
"How to give a good talk 101" is now called "Shine like a showbiz star on stage"
12.02.2026 03:03
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
23 years ago, I took a Delhi Zurich @swissair.bsky.social flight...
Had about 10 people in.... BLISS
07.02.2026 23:14
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
This, on the other hand, is true competition
bsky.app/profile/amun...
06.02.2026 12:36
π 4
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Cirque performatif
06.02.2026 12:30
π 3
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
@baym.lol I think you do agree that the current system sucks. Authors may not agree with Revrs & want to get different reviewers somewhere else. Revrs may not agree with the basic tenet of the work & want to gatekeep it from being published.
Unfort, its the feature of the pre-publ. review system
03.02.2026 19:55
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
03.02.2026 19:51
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
so MYF limited to 2025 levels and not 2024 levels? that would still be disastrous
03.02.2026 19:48
π 4
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
More #Keynesian bullshit
03.02.2026 13:32
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
#AI will be great at having answers
"Just not the correct" answers AND "Not just the correct" answers
03.02.2026 13:25
π 2
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
If we have time to keep sending reviews for papers, or keep getting our own papers reviewed unsatisfactorily before publication, we have the time to switch to a post-publication review system.
We have always had the time, what we have lacked is the will to do it, or because of the #concord effect
03.02.2026 01:48
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
On why pre-publication review was/is/will be a bad idea, and why we would all be better off moving to a post-publication review system
03.02.2026 01:33
π 2
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
The discussion summary already looks like AI generated slop
01.02.2026 04:06
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0