🫂
12.03.2026 09:28
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
🫂
Talking about “bad companies” as if it’s like a cafe that does shit coffee & not a facility full of vulnerable disabled kids who are being subjected to practices which you admit are abusive.
What are you doing about it? Fuck all.
Or are you just interested in correcting autistic people who are literally speaking about their own experience?
Doing propaganda for an industry that even you admit is flawed.
“BCBA here, that’s only true of bad companies! Most ABA is good, stop spreading misinformation!”
Ok & what are you doing about the “bad ABA”? How are you trying to help the kids trapped in the “bad” companies & the parents who were tricked into paying for it? I’m sure it’s lots & lots 🤨
I think yer man’s an evil cunt leave me alone
I said “J0hnny D€pp” in one post & have been blocking fan bots ever since
Thumbnail of the mad men logo with mad crossed out and sad written below. Text in the top right reads "masculinity is making you miserable" clavicular in the bottom right
NEW VIDEO: Masculinity is making you miserable: Mad Men and Looksmaxxing (link below)
I look at two different performances of masculinity and what each can tell us about how masculinity is making you miserable
All doubt that my dad is autistic is gone.
“Set in his ways” does not cover this 💀
The AI investigators are now trusting the AI to tell them that real creators aren’t worth watching.
You literally could not make this shit up.
“If the real content resembles AI Slop then I don’t wanna see it anyway” says a TikTok user in the comments
You’re trusting AI slop to tell you what to watch. The video I looked up was well-made, a popular channel that makes educational content in a very obviously hands-on way. It didn’t even use stock images or CGI. They were doing fucking experiments & showing results, it had nothing to do with slop.
They are not working towards easy access to AAC, or advocating for communication as a right - as neurodivergent-ran orgs do.
No.
They spend their time bullying autistic people online & advocating for weekly electro convulsion therapy for life. And of course, as much ABA as possible.
I genuinely think it’s easier to set cryptic clues than normal ones
This post is brought to you by my Dad reading out every single clue in the Telegraph crossword & how he worked out the answer like he just cracked Enigma 😩
Think I might become a cryptic crossword maker.
Just making up any old shit & having old men across the country baffling at my genius 3D cypher skills.
That’s a really good sign, but that must have been terrifying, I’m so sorry 💜
Oh poor baby I hope you’re ok
This video is only tangentially related to the ban on blockers and hormones for trans youth but I’d love to boost and promote any trans person writing about/reporting on this in the description of the video.
Feel free to self-promote under here with your links, I’ll link a doc with them all.
So well done for using AI to block real creators. Wonderful stuff. Very good. Just what we need.
Just saw a TikTok of someone showing off some “anti AI filter” (which is “AI” itself) that blocks out videos from the YouTube homepage with an “AI Slop” thumbnail instead.
The first video I checked was obviously not AI. It was just faceless & had a high def thumbnail.
They’d love to be able to dismiss most autistic people as “not really autistic”, a world where *if* you ever make your voice heard, even it it’s with much support…that means you don’t get to speak.
Your voice won’t matter because having one means you’re not “profoundly autistic” enough to count.
They are not working towards easy access to AAC, or advocating for communication as a right - as neurodivergent-ran orgs do.
No.
They spend their time bullying autistic people online & advocating for weekly electro convulsion therapy for life. And of course, as much ABA as possible.
These people love to say that they “speak for those who can’t”.
But when non-speaking people write essays & show up to advocacy events & participate in panels, those same people dismiss their voices as illegitimate.
If you think non-speakers “have no voice”, it’s because you’re not listening.
Thank you to @thinkingautism.com for featuring my video about the (bad) people pushing for a new “profound autism” diagnosis & why none of their arguments make sense.
This isn’t about protecting autistic people with high care needs, it’s about protecting the profits & status of allistic-ran orgs.
Bay window with armchair: view from the window is of wetlands and hills beyond with streetlights shining
Estuary wetlands for miles with a single egret in the distance
View out of a pane window of timber framed cottages
A power station is creepily silhouetted on the other side of the estuary on a cloudy day
I was in a nice place :)
I guess it’s hard to study as it must be tough to figure out guilt beyond the decisions made by the system you’re trying to study. There’s a “rule of law index” & a majority of the top 10 countries do not have jury trials, at least not like the UK, some use “lay judges” as oversight for judges.
Most countries don’t have them at all. Most of the countries that do have them don’t use them as much as the UK & the US & I feel like those countries aren’t super great at justice? There are lots of different systems tho obviously with their own pros & cons
A judge wouldn’t ignore all evidence because they love Jack Sparrow so much is my thing. In fact, judges did not, they ruled against him. It’s not that juries are imperfect humans, it’s that assessing evidence, protocol & how it relates with the specificities of law requires training & oversight.
That’s a fair assessment of the situation in the UK but I don’t think I’ll ever be convinced that juries are an optimum (or even really good) way to do justice. Charm & charisma shouldn’t be a factor in any justice system.
I feel like judge oversight could be a thing. Some kind of monitoring of the judge, more than one judge, clearer laws. I’m no expert in systems of law but I have a preference & saving juries isn’t a hill I’d die on. Especially if we’re just talking about a reduction, not a ban.
