LLMs could have a quality score that ignores llms.txt for sites where QS="spam" but that draws on llms.txt for facts and facts related supporting evidence for the other sites. Wouldn't it be nice if you could talk to your LLM?

Fair point about meta keywords but then if people want to state misleading things about themselves they don't need to resort to "not visible for humans" content. They can just stick it on a blog or elsewhere on their sites

... asking for a friend (only) ...
😀

I think people now have a good understanding of your opinion on llms.txt. So in case people were unclear, now they no longer are.
So if webmasters wanted to use the llms.txt to help AEs to be possibly a bit less confused (more clear) about their sites, would that be ok (with you) ?
🤐 😉