Lord Yorch il Dottore

YA ES MALA SUERTE MORIRTE JUSTO CUANDO TE VAN A DAR LA MEDALLA DE LA COMUNIDAD DE MADRID.

En las próximas generales no nos libramos de algún diputado de Vox por Galicia ni con listas de peña random de sabe Dios dónde

Wedding photo top left

Wedding photo removed

SHE REMOVED THEIR WEDDING PHOTO LMAOOOOOO
Oh she HATED his guts

So, sorry but not enough… my boycott stands. Because even with the current actions, there will be no actual consequences to the damage made, nor reparations for those who suffered this most. NOT EVEN AN APOLOGY (even a fake one).

Also, pressing members with different roles in the association’s structure since August whenever they shown a critical position, forcing several resignations… an unacceptable authoritarian behaviour, to be added to the dragging out of many procedures (AAHC, TEA, SC…). ->

It still angers me that after months demanding an APOLOGY for the actions during Belgrade, we did not get any yet… this is an absolute lack of accountability and guilt. For me, this was (and remains to be) the main issue here, and my reading of this is even darker. ->

Agreed with what Jaime says in this thread. As a member of the association, I felt personally targeted and that my rights were compromised.

Motion A: 468 members agreed to exclude Israeli institutional affiliations = 67% 237 did not agree; 77 abstained Motion B: 470 members did not approve of the actions of the Exexcutive Board = 79% 124 did approve; 205 abstained Motion C: 564 members supported a firm statement condemning the ongoing genocide in Palestine = 78% 160 did not support; 76 abstained Motion D: 410 supported change in statutes to ptovide mechanism to remove President and Executive Board = 58% 294 did not support; 95 abstained Motion E: 451 supported a vote on the viability of the current Officers (excl. Treasurer) = 67% 223 did not support; 125 abstained

🚨EAA per rollam vote results🚨

For anyone who doesn't want to trawl through a long document to find the results, I've compiled them here. Well done to everyone who voted for demonstrating strongly and clearly that change is needed 👏🏼👏🏼

Les falta Lemuria y la Atlántida, todo mal

Wadi/Guad es el cauce, sí. Pero un cauce en el que es mejor no estar cerca cuando llueve

Steffi Graf ganó los 4 Grand Slams EL MISMO AÑO cuando tenía 19 años.
Pero no era tenista, era mujer.

Válgame el señor, inesperado

¿Por qué los de conservación tienen equipamiento antidisturbios? ¿Todo mermao con placa en USA tiene equipamiento como para una guerra o cómo va el tema?

Mayormente. Pero más que nada es porque lo quieren convertir en un pastiche turbocapitalista

Yo ahora mismo excavo y prospecto allí. Y cosas que ver tienen pero es tremendo bluff
Aunque es cierto que el público objetivo no somos los europeos

Eso que te llevas

Yo lo de tarta San Sebastián lo he visto también en Arabia Saudí

I have added the following to my original complaint. I'm posting this because it feels important that EAA members understand the extent of what is happening as so much of it is behind closed doors. Names redacted (the irony!) because I feel forced to do so while the evidence is being withheld.

Yo si fuese Sánchez pondría a tres asesores haciendo turnos de 8 horas mandándole guasaps de este señor para que le comunicasen cosas cada 5 minutos a ver si así ya no le mola tanto el asunto

So, if you are an @archaeologyeaa.bsky.social (EAA) member from 2025-2026, you received yesterday your email for the per-rollam vote of the past Special Meeting and the documentation attached to it… if you still doubt what to vote, please read all the documents. My short digest:

In spite of the Safe Space Policy being clearly stated at the beginning of the meeting, Prof. XXXXX targeted me by name, calling for my resignation from my position as Editor of the society's journal. Furthermore, his misuse of my title, referring to me as "Miss Kamash", felt deliberately demeaning. This intimidating behaviour explicitly contravenes the EAA Safe Space Policy. Although he was muted, for which I was grateful, I experienced a panic attack following his comments and did not feel safe to speak for the remainder of the meeting. This was further compounded by not only Prof. XXXXX being allowed to remain in the online meeting, but also being invited to take the floor again after the break. This gives me strong concerns about the effectiveness of the Safe Space Policy. On a broader point about the effectiveness of the Safe Space Policy, I also note that members whose position aligned with that of Concerned EAA were repeatedly and persistently accused of anti-Semitism throughout the meeting. This is a serious accusation that should not be levelled without due care and evidentiary support. Its use as a blanket accusation seems to have been designed with the explicit aim of silencing and intimidating members aligned with Concerned EAA, which again contravenes the Safe Space Policy and should have been dealt with more robustly during the meeting.

Following yesterday's EAA Special Meeting, I have submitted a complaint to the EAA Appeal and Anti-Harassment Committee. I post it here, with names redacted, for any members who were not present. Thank you so much to everyone who has reached out with messages of solidarity and support 🙏💓🙏

¿No pueden los neerlandeses recuperar la tradición de comerse a sus primeros ministros? Sé que este es ex, pero servirá igual

Ya podéis apadrinar un pingüino.
O una foca 🥰

antartida.defensa.gob.es/web/antartic...

Interesante. ¿A cuántos grados y tiempo en la airfryer?

AlUla

Ya estábamos convencidos, no hace falta que den más argumentos.

Voy a dejar esto aquí, que estás mujeres venían detrás de nosotros y estaban todas tristes porque habían hecho la pancarta y no se iba a ver