yeah I swear to god if I catch you doing this shit in my streams I'll ban you so goddamn fast.
yeah I swear to god if I catch you doing this shit in my streams I'll ban you so goddamn fast.
today's bleak vibes bright to you by an entire comment section full of people saying they hate ethical thought experiments because they don't have any real world applications and can't be solved with "outside-the-box" practical solutions
I like forced femininization smut.
I also understand that were it to happen in real life it'd be reprehensible and horrible. As a trans person, forcing someone to have a body they don't feel comfortable in is the last thing I'd want
I also like vore smut
Surprisingly, I don't want to eat people
It's like, everyone with a brain understands that killing NPCs in video games or watching violence in movies does not translate to wanting to kill people IRL, but when it comes to smut, suddenly every fantasy is a manifesto of things we actually want to do. It's bonkers.
I hate having to say this again. If you see anything kink/NSFW stuff that makes you uncomfortable, just block and stay in your lane. If any of these artists are doing actual harm, then call them out on it. If they're not, mind your damn business. It's as simple as that.
hard not to read all this age verification and censorship shit as our deeply reactionary government got the faintest whiff that an unchecked internet severely interferes with their ability to propagandize and decided it had to die
aerith from final fantasy vii, with floral tattoos around her body as well as piercings on her eyebrow, nose, ear, navel, and nipples
aerith but tatted
With what's going on with Subscribestar, it's a good moment to remind you all of something:
Free speech also includes speech you don't agree with, and freedom of artistic expression also includes art you find horrible or disgusting.
And if you go: "Yeah I agree! However-"
Then you don't agree!
"I'm glad they finally censored thing I don't like haha"
Guess what, thing you like comes next.
Like I keep seeing artists and furries who should really know better say shit like "well it's actually a good thing (blank) is banned, but why are they banning (blank)???" like hello? Are you stupid? Have some awareness, my god.
And it really annoys me how little the greater fandom cares about censorship until their heckin wholesome vanilla anthro porn is under threat. News flash: these fascists consider ALL forms of erotic expression 'degenerate'.
this is the most unflattering way I depicted myself
(twitter trend)
This exact moment is perhaps the least true this has ever been
recommended graphic settings
Hey, for my fellow USians, please be sure to call your representatives to push back against the reskinned KOSA.
We've seen how powerful it is when we all speak out like against Discord, but they're trying to make that harder everywhere.
It'll be worth 5 mins now vs. years (if ever) later!
I'm so tired of having to defend porn made by consenting adults for consenting adults when our government is run by literal child predators that are hurting people everyday
lot of people on this site soaking themselves stupid making posts like "stop saying gross shit is ok" when people are very clearly saying "you are allowed to think something is absolutely vile but trusting the government/companies/paypros w the morality barometer is HISTORICALLY really dumb"
Sketch of two anthro feet. Left flat on the ground with caption "ordinary family friendly foot". Right tippy toeing with captions "if heel up, reaching illegal levels of lewd. Dinosaurwalking is heathen behavior. Might accidently lose balance, step on a micro and they'll like it. Don't be a tiptoe influencer. Fictional foot might ache Jesus didn't tiptoe on water"
So subscribestar basically
an illustration by Spindle of the characters Nanami, a volh (essentially a false-dragonborn) woman with white horns and long black hair, kissing and fingering Felt (a rabbitfolk woman with short pink hair). The view is from outside a window peeking onto them
meanwhile, with Felt and Nanami <3
Ya'll debating the morality of kinks in the replies are completely missing my point
I'm not arguing any morality here, I am arguing that GOVERNMENT / CORPS SHOULD NOT BE DECIDING ANYTHING FOR US WHEN IT COMES TO SEXUAL EXPRESSION ONLINE.
They WANT us to in-fight like this so they can keep pushing.
The fun part is it's all subjective.
I've drawn plenty of bdsm, some rough sex, characters with animal traits like tails. What constitutes a violation of the terms? Where are the lines drawn?
We are heading down a dark path and we have to be loud about it.
Even folks who create fictional content you may find reprehensible havent done a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of the harm a paypro CEO or the average politician/world leader has
Its not fucking fair man
What makes me so fucking mad is
I never hurt anyone. The vast, overwhelming majority of nsfw creators and sex workers dont.
We get cut off from the ability to use-the-dollar but all the sick fucks that hurt people, both directly and indirectly, every single day, never get even a slap on the wrist
websites be like "your password is not secure enough" and then don't allow the scarab
Today makes 15 years since the day I was let out of the mental health clinic my mom put me in for being trans.
Every time I see new laws meant to stop trans kids, I think back to that time and how the experience didnโt make me cisgender. It just made me hate myself until I could finally be me
ALSO PARDON THE FUCK FUCK OUTTA ME, but I don't think the whole "porn addiction" and "gooner" discourse appearing at the same time as payment processors applying the squeeze is a fuckin COINCIDENCE.
Nora hypnotizing Seth
CW - Hypnosis
Putting a spiky collar on a very precious friend <3
Hypnosis optional but so very comfy~
Feat @d0omsday.bsky.social
Art by @soraimeasdrawn.bsky.social
Let alone people actually read and understand things being said by artists who make things like hypnosis art, or a nude satyr, whatever. Too easy to have that gut reaction of *tsk tsk* disapproval. These kinks you find "icky?" They're not a sign of moral failure. I promise you that.
Regarding the last reskeet, I personally don't vibe with some of the stuff there, but it is ridiculous how draconian they're being about furries. Furthermore, this is all just stuff in art. It's hard for people to defend these things in 180 characters with the nuance needed.
"human-like knee orientation"
this is so crazy of a rule