Ken πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦'s Avatar

Ken πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦

@kenwali

Software Developer

973
Followers
749
Following
79
Posts
07.11.2024
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Ken πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ @kenwali

Post image
25.03.2025 05:21 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I do. It's funny how upset he gets. 🀭

10.03.2025 23:30 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I ran out of broken records to reply to his repetitiveness. 🀣

10.03.2025 19:44 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ’™

10.03.2025 16:39 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I can’t remember where I read this, but it’s important:

Why is it that when people think about traveling to the past, they worry about doing something small that will drastically change the present, but no one in the present thinks that doing something small today can drastically change the future?

19.02.2025 05:33 πŸ‘ 25221 πŸ” 5338 πŸ’¬ 622 πŸ“Œ 329

I honestly believe our most powerful position in a toxic time that feeds on cynicism, apathy,& despair is to genuinely care and act for a better world.

Cynicism is our enemy. We should check it, incl. on the left. It’s not intellectually superior. It’s the virus they’re trying to infect us with. NO

31.01.2025 19:04 πŸ‘ 146174 πŸ” 24224 πŸ’¬ 4174 πŸ“Œ 1466

I think it already is.

But seriously. Don’t call them names. We want the door open for them when they realize the mistake they made.

We are for a better America. Not a vindictive America

31.01.2025 15:01 πŸ‘ 57761 πŸ” 5536 πŸ’¬ 5762 πŸ“Œ 822
Post image

This is brilliant!! πŸ˜‚βœŠπŸΌ

18.01.2025 14:20 πŸ‘ 44237 πŸ” 8481 πŸ’¬ 386 πŸ“Œ 195

My one wish for the inauguration is that there is a gift bag under the seats of Bezos, Zuck, Elon etc, with a single, embroidered , padded knee pad

Need to protect themselves when they are on bended knee, kissing the ring πŸ€·πŸ˜†

17.01.2025 17:33 πŸ‘ 86022 πŸ” 12869 πŸ’¬ 5671 πŸ“Œ 1116

"Nobody gets angrier than a narcissist being accused of something they actually did."

Hide your ketchup.

10.01.2025 14:49 πŸ‘ 26968 πŸ” 3560 πŸ’¬ 339 πŸ“Œ 118
Inside the U.S. Capitol Attack, By Journalist Sandi Bachom
Inside the U.S. Capitol Attack, By Journalist Sandi Bachom YouTube video by NowThis Impact

This the @nowthis video of my account on January 6th. I will NEVER stop talking about it, for all who survived.

06.01.2025 00:22 πŸ‘ 343 πŸ” 140 πŸ’¬ 7 πŸ“Œ 4

The cyber truck is now being called the Deplorean? ☠️🀣

05.01.2025 17:46 πŸ‘ 275 πŸ” 50 πŸ’¬ 29 πŸ“Œ 5
Post image

"You voted for the guy because he was anti-immigration. Now he's going to let immigrants take the high-paying jobs but throw the fruit pickers out. His boss told you to go F your own face, then scolded you the next day, saying you should be nicer. What am I missing here?"

30.12.2024 20:50 πŸ‘ 23138 πŸ” 5603 πŸ’¬ 756 πŸ“Œ 281
Post image

Busted!!!

27.12.2024 03:48 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

And the GOP can't figure it out...

27.12.2024 01:47 πŸ‘ 22 πŸ” 4 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Love it when bookshops or libraries arrange their books appropriately...

23.12.2024 16:23 πŸ‘ 41273 πŸ” 5752 πŸ’¬ 536 πŸ“Œ 290
Post image
21.12.2024 05:42 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Unelected bureaucrat weighs in and wants to shut down the government.

πŸ™„

18.12.2024 19:24 πŸ‘ 8134 πŸ” 1930 πŸ’¬ 958 πŸ“Œ 228

He just made the most noise. πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

15.12.2024 03:19 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

That should have been him, a real hero!

14.12.2024 03:41 πŸ‘ 243 πŸ” 59 πŸ’¬ 7 πŸ“Œ 4
Dear Mr. Sauer:
I am writing in response to your letter dated November 26, 2024, regarding the above-referenced action. This Office will not stipulate to vacate the final judgment already entered by Supreme Court, New York County, in this action or otherwise seek to dismiss the action.
As you know, this is a civil enforcement action under Executive Law Β§ 63(12) against the Trump Organization, a business headquartered in New York, and its top executives concerning those defendants' fraudulent and unlawful actions to misleadingly inflate defendant Donald J. Trump's personal net worth in business transactions for the purpose of obtaining more favorable terms on loans and insurance policies than they otherwise would have received. This civil enforcement action was filed following a multiyear investigation by the Office, and multiple courts have rejected claims that the investigation or action were brought in anything other than good faith. See People v. Trump Org., Inc., 205 A.D.3d 625,
626-27 (1st Dep't 2022); Trump v. James, No. 1:21-1352, 2022 WL 1718951, at *12-14 (N.D.N.Y. May 27, 2022). Following summary judgment and an eleven-week bench trial, Supreme Court concluded that Mr. Trump and the other entity and individual defendants violated Β§ 63(12). The court also entered final judgment ordering various forms of equitable relief. Defendants appealed from Supreme Court's post-trial final judgment. That appeal has been fully briefed and argued in the Appellate Division, First Department, and the parties are now awaiting a decision from the First Department.
Your letter presents no basis for this Office to seek to vacate the final judgment or to dismiss this action.
First, Mr. Trump's upcoming inauguration as the next President of the United States has no bearing on the pendency of defendants' appeal in this action. This civil enforcement

Dear Mr. Sauer: I am writing in response to your letter dated November 26, 2024, regarding the above-referenced action. This Office will not stipulate to vacate the final judgment already entered by Supreme Court, New York County, in this action or otherwise seek to dismiss the action. As you know, this is a civil enforcement action under Executive Law Β§ 63(12) against the Trump Organization, a business headquartered in New York, and its top executives concerning those defendants' fraudulent and unlawful actions to misleadingly inflate defendant Donald J. Trump's personal net worth in business transactions for the purpose of obtaining more favorable terms on loans and insurance policies than they otherwise would have received. This civil enforcement action was filed following a multiyear investigation by the Office, and multiple courts have rejected claims that the investigation or action were brought in anything other than good faith. See People v. Trump Org., Inc., 205 A.D.3d 625, 626-27 (1st Dep't 2022); Trump v. James, No. 1:21-1352, 2022 WL 1718951, at *12-14 (N.D.N.Y. May 27, 2022). Following summary judgment and an eleven-week bench trial, Supreme Court concluded that Mr. Trump and the other entity and individual defendants violated Β§ 63(12). The court also entered final judgment ordering various forms of equitable relief. Defendants appealed from Supreme Court's post-trial final judgment. That appeal has been fully briefed and argued in the Appellate Division, First Department, and the parties are now awaiting a decision from the First Department. Your letter presents no basis for this Office to seek to vacate the final judgment or to dismiss this action. First, Mr. Trump's upcoming inauguration as the next President of the United States has no bearing on the pendency of defendants' appeal in this action. This civil enforcement

action is not a criminal action, and Supreme Court did not impose any criminal sanction on Mr. Trump or any other defendant. Accordingly, the various actions taken by the Special Counsel's office or the District Attorney's Office of New York County in the respective criminal cases brought by those offices against Mr. Trump are irrelevant here.
Contrary to your suggestion, the pendency of defendants' appeal during Mr. Trump's term as President fully comports with the U.S. Constitution. The final judgment concerns only business conduct undertaken by entities that are part of the Trump Organization and individual defendants who were acting on behalf of the Trump Organization. The judgment thus does not concern any conduct related to Mr. Trump's first term as President. Nor does it implicate any conduct that Mr. Trump might undertake after his upcoming inauguration.
Presidents do not have immunity from civil lawsuits arising from unofficial conduct, and such lawsuits may proceed while the President is in office. See Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 694
(1997); Zervos v. Trump, 171 A.D.3d 110, 128 (1st Dep't 2019); see also Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593, 615-16 (2024). Regardless, Mr. Trump's upcoming inauguration is irrelevant to the judgment rendered against the fourteen other defendants found liable by Supreme Court in this action.
There is also no merit to your claim that the pendency of defendants' own appeal will impede Mr. Trump's official duties as President. The ordinary burdens of civil litigation do not impede the President's official duties in a way that violates the U.S. Constitution. See Clinton,
520 U.S. at 705-06; Zervos, 171 A.D.3d at 125-26. In any event, Mr. Trump does not face any such litigation burdens here. The trial is over, final judgment has been rendered, and defendants' appeal to the First Department has been fully submitted and argued. Mr. Trump's official duties will not be impeded while awaiting the First Department's decision. Nor wi…

action is not a criminal action, and Supreme Court did not impose any criminal sanction on Mr. Trump or any other defendant. Accordingly, the various actions taken by the Special Counsel's office or the District Attorney's Office of New York County in the respective criminal cases brought by those offices against Mr. Trump are irrelevant here. Contrary to your suggestion, the pendency of defendants' appeal during Mr. Trump's term as President fully comports with the U.S. Constitution. The final judgment concerns only business conduct undertaken by entities that are part of the Trump Organization and individual defendants who were acting on behalf of the Trump Organization. The judgment thus does not concern any conduct related to Mr. Trump's first term as President. Nor does it implicate any conduct that Mr. Trump might undertake after his upcoming inauguration. Presidents do not have immunity from civil lawsuits arising from unofficial conduct, and such lawsuits may proceed while the President is in office. See Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 694 (1997); Zervos v. Trump, 171 A.D.3d 110, 128 (1st Dep't 2019); see also Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593, 615-16 (2024). Regardless, Mr. Trump's upcoming inauguration is irrelevant to the judgment rendered against the fourteen other defendants found liable by Supreme Court in this action. There is also no merit to your claim that the pendency of defendants' own appeal will impede Mr. Trump's official duties as President. The ordinary burdens of civil litigation do not impede the President's official duties in a way that violates the U.S. Constitution. See Clinton, 520 U.S. at 705-06; Zervos, 171 A.D.3d at 125-26. In any event, Mr. Trump does not face any such litigation burdens here. The trial is over, final judgment has been rendered, and defendants' appeal to the First Department has been fully submitted and argued. Mr. Trump's official duties will not be impeded while awaiting the First Department's decision. Nor wi…

The NY Attorney General has REJECTED Trump's bid to dismiss his $500M civil fraud judgment post-election. The AG stated that Trump's presidency doesn't shield him from civil litigation over non-official conduct, per the Constitution and multiple court precedents.

10.12.2024 17:20 πŸ‘ 14798 πŸ” 3296 πŸ’¬ 430 πŸ“Œ 224

🀣🀣🀣

06.12.2024 15:11 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I peeked in a day ago and almost posted a few more broken records... I can't believe Sully is still repeating all the same things. 🀣

06.12.2024 04:25 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

@occamsepilady1.bsky.social
I thought you should see this!
🀣🀣🀣

04.12.2024 15:46 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

Thespacebarfromtheirkeyboards.
(The space bar from their keyboards.)

04.12.2024 03:33 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image
04.12.2024 03:23 πŸ‘ 12 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 3 πŸ“Œ 0

My sis Brittney put together a starter pack for you guys with a bunch of our favorites from the old place

go.bsky.app/6xkdjk4

03.12.2024 19:31 πŸ‘ 1552 πŸ” 491 πŸ’¬ 211 πŸ“Œ 19
Post image
03.12.2024 02:08 πŸ‘ 714 πŸ” 172 πŸ’¬ 14 πŸ“Œ 8