C.M. Lewis's Avatar

C.M. Lewis

@thehousered

a bogeyman for the bosses he/him

3,985
Followers
452
Following
3,565
Posts
01.06.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by C.M. Lewis @thehousered

update: after a good night’s sleep I’ve recovered from my fevered delirium in which I thought they actually had something here

11.03.2026 13:34 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

but as far as any solid numbers on frequency and duration, really no way to reconstruct that easily

11.03.2026 13:16 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

one that comes to mind is SEIU 2015 a number of years ago

11.03.2026 13:15 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

my impression is that it’s been unsurprisingly rare since the 1970s and the initial formation of a lot of staff unions. at least for recent ones, I think most of them end up getting at least some press coverage since “union staff strike against union” is always good for a media hit

11.03.2026 13:15 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

politically. policy-wise, it absolutely is. but this doesn't feel uniquely stupid in the ranks of dumb shit they've done, and i can be convinced it could be smart (if i trusted them not to fuck it up)

11.03.2026 00:23 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0

eh i'm marginally open to the possibility it isn't the stupidest idea they've had

11.03.2026 00:22 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

there is an option to do a pledge that i turned on because why not, this IS labor after all, but i'm not paywalling anything and i probably won't even turn it on unless there's a ton of people bizarrely interested in financially supporting producing my screeds

11.03.2026 00:10 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

anyway, after a long spell of inactivity i'm going to get back to more writing on a platform i have more control over so i can dig more into stuff that i probably can't pitch to most pubs.

if you want to read some of that subscribe.

11.03.2026 00:09 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

to be clear i don't think it's good policy, but there's no risk of it actually happening so if it's just a setup to hammer the GOP on gas prices, that isn't the absolute worst idea congressional democrats have floated

11.03.2026 00:04 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

open to this being marginally smart provided there’s more to it than “introduced a bill”

11.03.2026 00:02 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 2 📌 0

phew they’re ahead of the ayatollah

11.03.2026 00:00 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
a sign that says California fast food workers union demand health and safety at work in front of a Wienerschnitzel

a sign that says California fast food workers union demand health and safety at work in front of a Wienerschnitzel

A Wienerschnitzel with a CAFFWU flag in front of it

A Wienerschnitzel with a CAFFWU flag in front of it

A Wienerschnitzel menu board with a labor strike reflected

A Wienerschnitzel menu board with a labor strike reflected

Workers on strike and allies in front of a Wienerschnitzel

Workers on strike and allies in front of a Wienerschnitzel

We’ve filed complaints with CalOSHA and the County Health Department.

We demand an end to all retaliation, restore our hours with back pay for the hours that were illegally cut, repair the leaking roof and stop threatening and retaliating against us for working with our union.

10.03.2026 22:42 👍 18 🔁 6 💬 0 📌 1

in fairness I suppose there’s a secret third option where they know what they’re asking for exists and this is part of setting up the attack, but believing that’s the most likely scenario requires granting the DNC a degree of trust I feel comfortable saying they haven’t earned

10.03.2026 22:35 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

and now that they’ve set the expectation that they need receipts it neutralizes their ability to use the attack unless they have ironclad receipts, because the immediate pushback is “you know you’re lying because we already dealt with this in court”

10.03.2026 22:26 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

I was open to this being a good idea and so I gave it a bit and read through the article and thought about it, and in gaming it out I don’t see how any outcome except “you got us, here’s the secret plan” does anything but backfire.

10.03.2026 22:25 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

here’s a notion:

just run with it as an attack without first demanding receipts that don’t exist, because when the response is “there’s nothing” *you can’t use the attack at all even if it’s true*

10.03.2026 22:21 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

FOIA doesn’t require a government agency to produce a document that doesn’t already exist, and so unless they’re keeping it in a “big secret binder to do fascism” there’s nothing to produce and the DNC ends this looking stupid

10.03.2026 22:19 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0

so basically, the DNC issued a FOIA for “give us the big secret plan to deploy federal troops at polling places,” the Trump administration didn’t produce anything, and now they’re going to court.

a thing i often tell union members in bargaining: don’t ask big questions you don’t know the answer to.

10.03.2026 22:17 👍 25 🔁 5 💬 1 📌 0

Dear god

10.03.2026 21:02 👍 513 🔁 65 💬 104 📌 0

well in either case the answer is “someone that isn’t Chuck Schumer”

10.03.2026 21:04 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

wait wait wait is the answer Harry Reid

10.03.2026 21:02 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

wild take to believe that the only reason the Democratic Party has bad numbers is people banking social capital, as if any regular ass human being’s approach to interpersonal relationships is “who can i get to like me by calling Chuck Schumer a chode”

10.03.2026 21:01 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

where’s that gif with principal skinner

10.03.2026 21:00 👍 4 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0

i forgot to tag @jeetheer.bsky.social who wrote a very excellent piece for the nation after the media all decided to issue press releases on Trump’s behalf during the UAW stand up strike

10.03.2026 20:54 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
10.03.2026 20:40 👍 2 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0

Could write a novel on b, featuring my large wrench of yes scientists are workers

10.03.2026 20:34 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0

remove some of the risk by providing the up front capital and i wonder if more media workers eyeing precarious freelancing/staff jobs will think “maybe we should think about this…”

10.03.2026 20:33 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

it’s a profoundly risky move *unless* you just all got laid off and don’t have job lined up and fuck why not give this a shot

10.03.2026 20:32 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

i would particularly be interested to talk to someone in that space regarding d.), but it seems like a lot of those pubs come out of the sudden demise of previous ones because there’s a “what do we have to lose” factor and you have an established audience you can try to quickly capture

10.03.2026 20:32 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

spinoff pieces i can get from this:
a.) the building trades are more complicated than you think
b.) not all union members are white men with hardhats, you absolute fools
c.) we’re so cooked by social media
d.) unions should start offering startup capital for worker owned media

10.03.2026 20:30 👍 16 🔁 2 💬 2 📌 2