I think it would have been much more interesting if they were hiring a MAGICIAN at the associate level
10.03.2026 06:38
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
I think it would have been much more interesting if they were hiring a MAGICIAN at the associate level
AH
Bedtime convo:
Me: I love you sweetie, good night
6.5yo: Do all multiplications exist?
Me, favoring brevity and sleep over philosophical rigor: Yes.
Poor kid might end up Fregean, and it's all my fault. Parenting is such a huge responsibility.
Been thinking about Picasso's Guernica for a few days. Don't know why.
Would like to get a hot take by @dieworkwear.bsky.social
I don't understand why there are editors who allow publishing papers that don't cite my work, even though it is clearly at least partially in the general vicinity of the area of the ballpark of what might be considered at least somewhat tangentially relevant to them.
Peer review is broken.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHH
Call for papers deadline March 16:
Business Ethics in the 6ix is an annual workshop on business ethics at Toronto Metropolitan University.
This is year 10 and we have keynotes lined up by Lisa Herzog (Uni Groningen) and Joe Heath (U of T)
businessethicsinthe6.wordpress.com/call-for-pap...
I don't like the return to double breasted suits.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHH
No stupid rules of logical reasoning
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
It's tricky just to walk around, to walk around, to walk around.
It's tricky.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH
AAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Yeah I'm most definitely not presenting this paper ever again.
That's amazing - congratulations!
In June, I was in Germany presenting a paper at a conference. Israel decided to attack Iran.
Now, I am in Italy presenting a (the same) paper at a conference.
So, probably I should stop presenting this paper? Or attend conferences altogether? IDK. FML.
ΧΧΧ©ΧΧͺ ΧΧ¨Χ’ΧΧ©ΧΧͺ ΧΧΧ Χ‘ ΧΧ‘ΧΧ¦ΧΧΧΧ!
ΧΧΧ’Χ¨ΧΧ ΧΧ Χ¦ΧΧΧͺ ΧΧΧ Χ’Χ¨ΧΧΧΧΧͺ Χ©ΧΧ§ΧΧΧ ΧΧ’Χ¨ΧΧΧΧΧͺ ΧͺΧΧͺ, Χ ΧΧ¦Χ ΧΧΧ Χ¦Χ: ΧΧΧΧΧ.
Doesn't come up that often if you get desk rejected most of the time.
My thoughts exactly! (about bayesian probabilities and statistics)
Nothing says 'I love you' more than 'renewable upon review'.
Could you please get started on quote marks and punctuation?
(Also, one prof in grad school basically berated my grammar in the comments on a piece of coursework. I still get pissy about it.)
Phew.
What a relief.
Is it?!
They say he's unqualified to comment about economics because he's not an economist.
I'm pretty sure economists are also unqualified to comment on economics.
26 weeks cut, 22lbs lost (with noticeable strength gains). Pretty dope.
In other news, 20 year long effort to get TT job falls off cliff, crashes on boulders, eyewitnesses say.
After 5 straight years of 1yr postdocs and a gazillion failed applications, it looks like I'm officially out of the running for a TT job in philosophy.
Bummer. But at least now I can start mourning it.
On the plus side, I can finally go all in on part time, precarious teaching gigs.
What if there's also a 'you won't believe what they look like now'?
