Wow, that was a long time ago. Thanks for your kind words. And I still have the watch!
14.02.2026 16:10
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Wow, that was a long time ago. Thanks for your kind words. And I still have the watch!
A problem with building new NPPs that I have not seen mentioned anywhere so far: it makes you somewhat of a hostage to fortune. Should there be another accident anywhere during the construction phase, public opinion is likely to swing against nuclear once more, risking a possible loss of investment.
When techies are taking over the government, it is the tech press who must step in.
Alternatively, try Philip Roth's "The plot against America". So good, and perhaps a reason to be optimistic at the very end.
Ich habe ernsthaft zuerst #presseförderungnurnochfürrechtequalitätsmedien gelesen. Was so ein "r" doch ausmachen kann.
For some reason, this also caught my eye, and I vaguely remembered seeing a £10 version a few minutes before, but I put it down to the difference between World and UK news. May have been a false memory, though.
I had to squint a bit keeping the colors for Italy and Japan apart. Is it really Italy coming out of Covid in second place?
Interessant fände ich trotzdem, was sich in den letzten Jahren verändert hat, um den Saldo langsam Richtung Import zu verschieben: ist Strom in D relativ gesehen teuerer geworden, oder eher das Ausland billiger?
Nur aus Neugier: ist die Beschränkung auf "Berge und Almen" tatsächlich Teil der Gesetzesvorlage? Oder geht es um ein komplettes Moratorium?
Kind reminder that this is not Twitter: you can (and should) post links to original sources in the first post: www.roadandtrack.com/news/a629191...
"[...] the insurance industry, which skims off a substantial part along the way."
How big is that actually, as a share? In Europe, we often hear that US health spending is very high, but largely blame it on providers: for-profit hospitals, tort law, malpractice insurance etc.
Diese speziellen Anzeigen sind schon länger eine Landplage auf X. Ich würde sie aber eher in Richtung Krypto- und CFD-Scam einordnen. Früher gab es das eine Zeitlang mit "Höhle der Löwen", Joko und Klaas und anderen Prominenten.
So far, the type of effort required as proof of work was mostly production of formally correct, not obviously nonsensical text. This is probably gone with LLMs, so the question is what the next filter will be. Physical effort, e.g. prioritizing hand-written requests? Proof of stake, e.g. deposits?