Dr Nick Dickinson's Avatar

Dr Nick Dickinson

@nickdickinson

Political Scientist | British Politics and History | PhD on political salaries (Exeter) | Mst. Modern British and European History (Oxford) | DMs closed, email me @n.dickinson3@exeter.ac.uk

1,466
Followers
812
Following
1,746
Posts
10.10.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Dr Nick Dickinson @nickdickinson

What they will actually do is have them win but then the First Order will happen anyway unrelatedly, rendering both this and the OT entirely pointless as stories because the Empire just comes back again off screen every time.

11.03.2026 21:20 πŸ‘ 8 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

The really funny thing is they technically have to explain in this film and Ashoka S2 how the Empire is back (for all intents and purposes) by TFA with an even bigger super weapon as a result of JJ making this same mistake. But they can’t because it would mean Ashoka and the gang have to lose hard.

11.03.2026 21:16 πŸ‘ 15 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 3

Rumsfeld: fails at post-war planning

Hegseth: *hold my beer* (literally)

Fails to plan for actual war

11.03.2026 20:49 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

It's not about how much stock you have, it's about how many GPUs you can get out of the building with

11.03.2026 13:54 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

PhD Studentship Political Science #ECPRMemberJobs
πŸ“… Four-year doctoral programme
🏫 @tcdpoliticalsci.bsky.social
βŒ› Wed 1 April
buff.ly/E1PBbuT
#PolSciJobs #PoliSky #AcademicSky

11.03.2026 12:50 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 3 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

lol

11.03.2026 12:46 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Deeply Trump-like reaction too. Similar to how he describes random people and organizations as having "ratings" as if they were TV shows

11.03.2026 11:53 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

the most thoroughly vindicated man in hollywood.

trade disputes and conspiracies βœ”οΈ

republic subverted over sex hangups βœ”οΈ

β€œsand people” killed, royalty indifferent βœ”οΈ

naive idiot casts vote for tyranny βœ”οΈ

villains with silly names like β€œdooku” βœ”οΈ

powerful clerical order screwing up βœ”οΈ

list goes on

11.03.2026 10:38 πŸ‘ 4189 πŸ” 1022 πŸ’¬ 41 πŸ“Œ 16

Like it actually was this because the candidate on one side was just imposed at the last minute because it was the only option and Kang was worse. bsky.app/profile/cmon...

10.03.2026 22:08 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

It’s like everyone forgot that this wasn’t a normal process at all and it’s the same debate as β€œBernie would have won” when the situation is fundamentally different.

10.03.2026 22:05 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I have trouble understanding how the lack of primaries in 2024 is something both sides don’t see as central to this pointless debate. You can’t concretely say either β€œthe Dems are just the same as the GOP” or β€œthis wouldn’t be happening under the Democrats” because nobody got to see that debate.

10.03.2026 22:03 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Really interesting. My sense even then was, in addition to its immediate goals, PV represented a kind emotional catharsis especially if you sat out the initial campaign. But it also formed a more confident liberal identity in the U.K. you still see now across Green and Lib Dem voters especially.

10.03.2026 21:24 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Your academic career as a GIF? This was one of my favorite strings back in the days of Twitter.
Maybe we can recreate it?

#academicsky #research

10.03.2026 19:06 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 1
10.03.2026 19:37 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Basically a Liberal deep cover op at this point

10.03.2026 18:57 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Should have been this

10.03.2026 18:51 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

This Hornet: hey buddy, what you doing there? Grilling?

10.03.2026 18:41 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

One of those purely "defensive" sorties no doubt

10.03.2026 17:24 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
10.03.2026 17:10 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I mean, has anyone checked there isn't actually just a big pile of ships stacked on top of each other

10.03.2026 16:45 πŸ‘ 13 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Making it sound like they did it on the spur of the moment like the DC sandwich guy

10.03.2026 16:28 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Honestly in Kwarteng’s case he probably just needed a job, and I don’t imagine the offers from legitimate firms were exactly piling in. He didn’t start Stack he’s just the front man.

10.03.2026 16:21 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Ironically the exchanges like Binance that did/do allow that are the more sustainable ones. There’s a non-gambling demand for the service underpinned by real economic activity.

10.03.2026 16:16 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

There’s of course no guarantee this would have worked, but what a dumb thing to hand-wave away if you were planning on an Iran confrontation

10.03.2026 12:53 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

The attraction is there are billions of dollars to be made if you can get someone else to buy it. That is all it’s been for the last decade.

10.03.2026 12:45 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

And all they have actually bought, and likely ever will, is Bitcoin. Treasuries are just a proxy for the BTC price but designed to make it β€œeasier” to hold - i.e. by less sophisticated investors you can take advantage of for liquidity.

10.03.2026 12:43 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

And if/when these companies start to fail, which they will just like the FTX-style exchanges and dividend-earning stable coins did, you need someone in political power to make sure any crimes you committed go away. Hence Farage’s involvement.

10.03.2026 12:33 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

The broader thing going on here is BTC holders trying to get actual $ out of crypto without crashing the price. Bitcoin treasuries are a way to do that by β€œdemocratising” access to β€œdigital assets”. This really means leaving small investors holding the bag. It’s both corrupt and a greater-fool scam.

10.03.2026 12:28 πŸ‘ 6 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

There are only two reasons this would happen; 1) it’s standard crypto hype, and this will fall again unless Bitcoin recovers; 2) and I think more likely here, this is a way to pay Nigel Farage on the basis of expected future political power. It’s exactly what Trump did with World Liberty Financial.

10.03.2026 12:23 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

This is even worse than it looks. Stack is a bitcoin treasury, which means its has no real business other than holding BTC and hoping the price goes up. Hilariously Kwarteng joined just as bitcoin stated to crater, along with (naturally) the stock price. But look at it now. 1/

10.03.2026 12:20 πŸ‘ 11 πŸ” 3 πŸ’¬ 4 πŸ“Œ 1