Ever wondered how the Dalmatian Dog effect works?
The human brain can quickly learn from a single experience and generalize it to related experiences β an impressive feat so far not matched by AI.
Our new paper in @natcomms.nature.com reveals how this works.
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
04.02.2026 17:00
π 84
π 33
π¬ 2
π 4
What is the brain for? Active inference is widely discussed as a unifying framework for understanding brain function, yet its empirical status remains debated. Our review identifies core predictions across the action-perception cycle and evaluates their empirical support: osf.io/preprints/ps...
29.01.2026 08:28
π 98
π 39
π¬ 2
π 1
Congratulations!
11.12.2025 21:00
π 1
π 0
π¬ 1
π 1
Join us in ASSC 2026 !
29.11.2025 10:51
π 6
π 3
π¬ 1
π 0
New today in @Nature: your visual cortex contains touch-based body maps. bit.ly/VisualBodyMaps
Your brain transforms what you see into first-person, body-referenced codes: A previously unknown bridge between vision and touch.
26.11.2025 16:00
π 82
π 41
π¬ 6
π 11
OSF
Pre-print π "Subjective and objective approaches in the study of conscious perception" will be a chapter in www.horizon-minds.com. We explain that subjective and objective are poorly defined constructs and provide a taxonomy.
doi.org/10.31234/osf...
with @svangaal.bsky.social @timostein.bsky.social
17.10.2025 08:34
π 19
π 5
π¬ 0
π 1
PNAS
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans...
Out for a while but forgot to post it. Using pupil size as a proxy for arousal, we show that the inverted-U shaped arousalβperformance curve (Yerkes-Dodson law) is not fixed, but can shift globally depending on neuromodulatory state (atomoxetine): arousal recalibration www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
23.09.2025 15:54
π 17
π 4
π¬ 0
π 1
π§ New preprint: Why do deep neural networks predict brain responses so well?
We find a striking dissociation: itβs not shared object recognition. Alignment is driven by sensitivity to texture-like local statistics.
π Study: n=57, 624k trials, 5 models doi.org/10.1101/2025...
08.09.2025 18:32
π 113
π 37
π¬ 5
π 5
A great example of engagement with open peer review π
26.08.2025 12:01
π 7
π 2
π¬ 0
π 0
The great @stijnnuiten.bsky.social on the mechanisms of optimal arousal state. #ASSC28 @assc28.bsky.social
07.07.2025 13:10
π 17
π 6
π¬ 0
π 0
Confirmation bias through selective readout of information encoded in human parietal cortex
Nature Communications - People often discard incoming information when it contradicts their pre-existing beliefs about the world. Here, the authors show that this discarded information is precisely...
1/ New paper by Hame Park, (@AraziAyelet), Bharath Talluri, Marco Celotto, Stefano Panzeri, Alan Stocker & Tobias Donner published in Nature Communications β βConfirmation Bias through Selective Readout of Information Encoded in Human Parietal Cortexβ: rdcu.be/etlR7. Here is a summary:
27.06.2025 13:35
π 39
π 20
π¬ 1
π 0
Very happy this is finally out π. In this paper, we show that conf. reports are biased by a visual illusion, an asymmetrical base rate and a payoff scheme. Crucially, we show that only the visual illusion affects subj. experience, suggesting decision bias leaks onto confidence reports.
22.05.2025 10:53
π 30
π 11
π¬ 2
π 1
A causal role of the NMDA receptor in recurrent processing during perceptual integration
Memantine selectively improves neural decoding of attended illusory contours, revealing NMDA receptor-dependent enhancement of feedback processing in human visual perception.
We show that memantine selectively improves neural decoding of attended illusory Kanizsa triangles, revealing NMDA receptor-dependent enhancement of feedback processing.
elifesciences.org/articles/100...
Thanks to Samuel Noorman @fahrenfort.bsky.social @timostein.bsky.social Jasper Zantvoord
25.06.2025 09:46
π 29
π 13
π¬ 3
π 1
Out now @cp-trendscognsci.bsky.social, w/ @akalt.bsky.social & @drmattdavis.bsky.social.
Are sensory sampling rhythms fixed by intrinsically-determined processes, or do they couple to external structure? Here we highlight the incompatibility between these accounts and propose a resolution [1/6]
19.06.2025 11:18
π 69
π 31
π¬ 3
π 1
π₯³ The 2024 Impact Factor & CiteScores are now released. We're pleased to inform you that Neuroscience of Consciousness #NCONSC achieved an Impact Factor ofβ― 4.3 (2023 IF 4.1). We are very excited and thankful for our prolific community of consciousness science! #consci @thomasandrillon.bsky.social
18.06.2025 11:03
π 17
π 4
π¬ 1
π 0
Call for Commentary Proposals - Conscious artificial intelligence and biological
Call for Commentary Proposals - Conscious artificial intelligence and biological naturalism
1/ Can AI be conscious? My Behavioral & Brain Sciences target article on βConscious AI and Biological Naturalismβ is now open for commentary proposals. Deadline is June 12. Take-home: real artificial consciousness is very unlikely along current trajectories. www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
07.06.2025 08:58
π 63
π 20
π¬ 2
π 7
abstract blue and ink image that resembles a slice through a brain
π§ Did you really see that? Or did your brain just think you did?
How confidently we report what we see can shape our brain activity. That means our own reporting habits might blur the line between βawareβ and βunawareβ in research on #consciousness.
buff.ly/L3c7sVe
02.06.2025 15:59
π 3
π 1
π¬ 1
π 0
Large-scale interactions in perception and prediction across species | HiLIFE β Helsinki Institute of Life Science | University of Helsinki
Andres Canales-Johnson research group
I am opening one PhD position at the Neuroscience Center @uhneuro.bsky.social, focusing on large-scale neural interactions in perception and prediction (ECoG/LFPs/MEG) across human and non-human primates using comp. modeling and information theory. contact: www.helsinki.fi/en/hilife-he...
30.05.2025 11:01
π 27
π 15
π¬ 0
π 1
Finally the Version of Record of our paper "Criterion placement threatens the construct validity of neural measures of consciousness" is out in @elife.bsky.social as *fundamental* and *compelling*!
doi.org/10.7554/eLif....
29.05.2025 09:11
π 30
π 11
π¬ 2
π 1
(couldn't wait till Monday because I'm impatient) this lovely preprint has the last part of my phd work and now is out and about ππ. will write a thread on Monday. stay tuned π».
osf.io/preprints/ps...
24.05.2025 09:39
π 38
π 8
π¬ 3
π 0
To celebrate the defence of my PhD, and thanks to
@ibbamsterdam.bsky.social, I will host a symposium titled "Vision as prediction: learning, action, and biases" on June 6. Program, registration and more information here: bit.ly/43reOgR
20.05.2025 12:48
π 16
π 11
π¬ 1
π 1
Criterion placement threatens the construct validity of neural measures of consciousness
π Our paper "Criterion placement threatens the construct validity of neural measures of consciousness" is now out in eLife! π
TL;DR: Both simulations and empirical data show that you should not post-hoc sort neural data based on subjective measures of consciousness.
elifesciences.org/reviewed-pre...
03.12.2024 08:27
π 56
π 20
π¬ 3
π 4
Bias manipulation modulates pre-stimulus motor cortex lateralisation, reflecting a starting point bias. This task-related modulation of lateralised activity is weakest on trials with large phasic pupil-linked arousal.
Neural and computational analyses further revealed that task effects on preparatory activity over motor cortex, resembling a starting point bias, were smallest on trials with high phasic pupil-linked arousal. (5/6)
19.05.2025 15:13
π 0
π 1
π¬ 1
π 0
Phasic and tonic arousal distinctly shape human decision bias
Neuroscientific theories hypothesize that arousal fluctuations influence human perception and behavior in two functionally distinct ways: through variations in baseline state (tonic arousal) and by tr...
β οΈ Come see our new preprint, in which we (@degeelab.bsky.social, Jasper Zantvoord, @psterzer.bsky.social, @fahrenfort.bsky.social & @svangaal.bsky.social) show that phasic (task-evoked) and tonic (baseline) arousal distinctly shape human decision bias! (1/6)
dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs....
19.05.2025 15:13
π 10
π 6
π¬ 1
π 0