The fk? Now I have to hate Hugh Jackman, too? π«π«©
@marts-thoughts
Interests: Biology, History, Public Policy, Data Science, GIS, and all things interesting. Health care analyst and Democratic activist, living outside Seattle. Avid canvasser trying to save democracy.
The fk? Now I have to hate Hugh Jackman, too? π«π«©
Also naturally, his POV is helpful to his industry, garners support, and gets pushed far and wide to obscure the strong consensus.
And you call me a cultist, lol. Ad hominem.
Heterodox is a fancy way to say 'on the wrong side of well-supoorted consensus'.
But seriously, this guy is not a climate scientist. And he works in extractive industries, so naturally he'd want what he says to be true.
Showing this to myself in 2022 and having an aneurysm
Ah, a mining geologist! Great find with -no- conflicts of interest in his rEsUrCh.
If my paycheck depended on killing regulations on the byproducts of my livelihood, I might lie my ass off too.
I invite you to book your next surgery with a Theology PhD if you listen to this kook's sYuNcE.
You know 'temperature' predates people measuring it right? Do you simply think it's unknowable? Like 'a bear shitting in the woods' thing?
Ya see, I can't quite tell if you are simply a denialist that takes oil industry-funded propaganda at face value, or if you know better and just prefer to troll.
Anyway, there's this whole thing called the Scientific Method... ice cores, modeling, etc...
"normal range", even if it sets a March record? There is no evidence that outside of a catastrophic volcanic eruption, the climate has changed this rapidly.
Just kind of a right-wing contrarian troll? Is that your milieu?
Bro is -pressed- because he was too stupid to understand that some dumbfk's definition of 'mAnLiNeSs' is defined by sending your sons to die in the desert.
gfy
Sooo, are you predicting it won't be 105+ in Phoenix next week or that it isn't climate change that will cause it?
We donβt have to worry about Iranian sleeper cells when we have this guy on the job.
He's actually primarying a sitting Rep who was installed by AIPAC, something completely different from what you think you understand about this race.
The world is healing.
Haterade indeed.
I'm never not one to deify Kobe myself; as a Sonics fan, I was indeed a hater.
It seems like ATMs *did* cause a significant decline in the employment of tellers if this graph had been normalized to population. π€
A modest proposal:
Lol, he's just tired of being in so many meetings with the a**holes in his party.
So... fewer meetings, same giant paycheck. Mkay. ππ»
I was gonna say Andy Rooney, but I don't think he ever quoted Edmund Burke.
As with all previous instances, I'd like to know which of his 'friends' made a ton of money off the whims of this dotard.
1901 was 125 years ago, but who's counting, genius-brain!
No worries there. Regarding to he Strait, Trump said he was going to "take it over", and the markets _loved_ the news... π«©
Peace in our time!!
'Mr. Karamazov' needs to not 'yuck' someone else's 'yum'.
Yeah, nah. I'm not gonna forget how stupid the Biden administration was to allow Bibi to dogwalk us to electoral oblivion.
And I'm not gonna forget that the Republican Party needs to go the way of the dodo.
Yeah, there is so much silent or invisible in the constitution, where the expectation/assumption is rational actors in all the crucial positions.
Not a mentally unwell narcissist grappling with his mortality.
Not a whole party divorced from democracy.
I'd rather not live in interesting times, tbh.
Senator Mullin on January 6th
"As you know, you go to war with the army you have, not the one you might want or wish to have at a later date."
Previous dipshit, Republican war criminal SecDef Donald Rumsfeld 12/9/04
What's old is new again. Every Republican presidency is a mistake we all have to live through.
Why didn't the US consult Ukraine, the one country that knows how to country attacks from thousands of cheap drones?
www.theatlantic.com/national-sec...
The 2026 electorate will have no precedent. You don't know what it will look like any more than I do. We can speculate, but the confident armchair consultant take is nonsense.
I did. Huge turn out from Hispanics who swung to Talarico. Huge turnout from black folks for Crockett. Two groups who have been put through hell by this criminal admin.
But to say *only* Talarico could win is nonsensical speculation.
Man, a voting population that completely mirrors the demographic population? That's amazing! Tell me how Texas has accomplished such a feat when no one else has.