Jens Daniel Müller's Avatar

Jens Daniel Müller

@jens-d-mueller

Ocean Carbon Cycle and Climate Solutions // Research Fellow at Carbon to Sea https://jens-daniel-mueller.github.io

979
Followers
582
Following
123
Posts
27.10.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Jens Daniel Müller @jens-d-mueller

Post image

If you’re at #OSM26 in Glasgow, I’ve just signed lots of copies of Blue Machine that are now on sale in the shop at @glasgowscience.bsky.social 🌊🌊 Share the ocean love!

21.02.2026 14:46 👍 170 🔁 19 💬 5 📌 1

Extremely insightful and complex study on ocean alkalinity enhancement under different future emission scenario. Congratulations to @jhauck.bsky.social and team. This is a great primer for many of the things we plan to elaborate further in #OAEMIP.

15.01.2026 16:43 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

🙏 Thanks to Hanna van de Mortel and Nina Bednarsek for leading the effort, and to Nicolas Gruber, @banjogreg.bsky.social , and Richard Feely for great contributions.

07.01.2026 13:38 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

⚠️ Caveat
We focus on the direct effects of alkalinity enhancement. The broader benefit that CO₂ removal — irrespective of the method — reduces ocean acidification is not considered here.

07.01.2026 13:38 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

📝 Implication
The more efficient OAE is at removing CO₂, the less effective it becomes at mitigating biological impacts of ocean acidification. Nevertheless, OAE can provide localized acidification relief around the deployment site, motivating deployments with explicit biological objectives.

07.01.2026 13:38 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Time series for the restoration of pHT for four levels of TA additions from 1985 to 2022 compared to the unperturbed conditions. Computations are done assuming ηmax = 0.832 (coastal region) and 80% CDR efficiency.

Time series for the restoration of pHT for four levels of TA additions from 1985 to 2022 compared to the unperturbed conditions. Computations are done assuming ηmax = 0.832 (coastal region) and 80% CDR efficiency.

Taking a “time-machine” perspective inspired by @davidho.bsky.social , we asked: How far back in time does a coastal alkalinity addition of 50 µmol kg⁻¹ take calcification conditions?→ About 20 years, for an assumed 80% CDR efficiency and depending on location.

07.01.2026 13:38 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Fully restoring preindustrial calcification conditions under equilibrated CO₂ would require an average alkalinity increase of ~300 µmol kg⁻¹ — far exceeding the ~60 µmol kg⁻¹ surface-ocean DIC increase since the industrial era.

07.01.2026 13:38 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Calcification rate decline due to OA, calcification rate increase upon 50 μmol/kg NaOH addition, and NaOH addition required to restore preindustrial conditions. (a) Decline of species-specific calcification rates from preindustrial to current conditions, (b) the relative increase in  calcification rate compared to the current conditions baseline upon 50 μmol kg−1 NaOH addition, and (c) the concentration of NaOH addition required to restore calcification to the preindustrial conditions assuming unequilibrated conditions.

Calcification rate decline due to OA, calcification rate increase upon 50 μmol/kg NaOH addition, and NaOH addition required to restore preindustrial conditions. (a) Decline of species-specific calcification rates from preindustrial to current conditions, (b) the relative increase in calcification rate compared to the current conditions baseline upon 50 μmol kg−1 NaOH addition, and (c) the concentration of NaOH addition required to restore calcification to the preindustrial conditions assuming unequilibrated conditions.

📉 What this means in numbers
Increasing total alkalinity by 50 µmol kg⁻¹ enhances calcification by ~14% on average across species — substantial when compared to an average 17% decline since preindustrial times. However, once CO₂ uptake is realized, the recovery drops to <5% on average.

07.01.2026 13:38 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Changes in seawater−carbonate chemistry due to OAE and subsequent uptake of atmospheric CO2 returning pCO2 to the pretreatment level. Conceptual diagram illustrating the effect of  OAE on pH and [CO32−], considering a two-step procedure in which first TA is enhanced under otherwise isochemical conditions (DIC = const., Step 1) followed by a re-equilibration of the seawater sample with current atmospheric pCO2 (Step 2).

Changes in seawater−carbonate chemistry due to OAE and subsequent uptake of atmospheric CO2 returning pCO2 to the pretreatment level. Conceptual diagram illustrating the effect of OAE on pH and [CO32−], considering a two-step procedure in which first TA is enhanced under otherwise isochemical conditions (DIC = const., Step 1) followed by a re-equilibration of the seawater sample with current atmospheric pCO2 (Step 2).

🧪 Why?
This outcome follows directly from marine CO₂ chemistry: under constant atmospheric pCO₂, even substantial increases in alkalinity lead to only small changes in pH and carbonate ion concentration.

07.01.2026 13:38 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 1

📊 Key result
OAE leads to only moderate improvements in calcification, especially once the additional CO₂ uptake from the atmosphere is realized.

07.01.2026 13:38 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

🔬 Approach
Using experimental data from 27 marine calcifiers negatively affected by acidification, we quantified how calcification would recover under different levels of alkalinity enhancement. Crucially, we distinguish between scenarios with and without the intended uptake of atmospheric CO₂.

07.01.2026 13:38 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Preview
Substantial Limitations of Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement in Mitigating the Negative Impacts of Ocean Acidification on Marine Calcifiers Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement (OAE) is increasingly considered as a marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) strategy with the potential cobenefit of mitigating ocean acidification (OA), but this remains p...

🌊 New paper out assessing the potential of Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement (OAE) to mitigate the impacts of ocean acidification on marine calcifiers
doi.org/10.1021/acs....

07.01.2026 13:38 👍 20 🔁 9 💬 1 📌 0

Editorial note: I just learned that additional credits have been issued in the meantime, for the continued CO2 uptake simulated to have occurred after the first crediting period.

26.11.2025 16:24 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

🌊

26.11.2025 16:06 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Lots of things to be done, and I look forward to tackling some of them by coordinating the upcoming #OAEMIP. Stay tuned.

26.11.2025 15:37 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

⏳ The largest cut to the gross CDR estimate (>30%) comes from limiting the crediting period to three months beyond deployment. This is required for ex-post crediting, but I’m wondering how we will handle this in the future — especially for larger-scale interventions.

26.11.2025 15:37 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0

📉 There is no established routine to propagate the individual uncertainty components in the simulated CO₂ uptake into a transparent uncertainty budget. Developing these routines would strengthen verification and reveal where model improvements are most urgently needed.

26.11.2025 15:37 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

⚖️ Model uncertainties are subtracted from the gross CDR estimate to obtain the carbon removal that can be credited. I like this conservative approach, but based on my experience with quantifying the “natural” ocean carbon sink, I’m wondering if the reported ~10% uncertainty is high enough.

26.11.2025 15:37 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Preview
Carbon to Sea, MEOPAR, and Planetary Announce JLO in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada  - Carbon to Sea Initiative Today, the Carbon to Sea Initiative, the Marine Environmental Observation, Prediction and Response Network (MEOPAR), and Planetary Technologies announced a new Joint Learning Opportunity (JLO) to adva...

If you agree, consider submitting a proposal to our joined learning opportunity accompanying the next major OAE experiment: www.carbontosea.org/2025/11/10/h...

26.11.2025 15:37 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

🚢 It is not required to demonstrate through measurements at sea that the added feedstock dissolved and increased alkalinity as expected. Quantifying OAE in the far field is certainly tough — but shouldn’t it be possible in the near field?

26.11.2025 15:37 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

🎉 But first of all: huge congratulations to everyone involved! Quantifying the carbon removal required combining four different types of models with measurements from the field and in the lab. It’s a massive effort and truly at the forefront of what science can deliver today.

26.11.2025 15:37 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

As a newbie to the field, moving over from fundamental ocean carbon research, there are a couple of aspects that surprised me.

26.11.2025 15:37 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Preview
The First OAE Credits: An Independent MRV Review - Carbon to Sea Initiative Carbon to Sea’s MRV Blog Series: This is the second installment in Carbon to Sea’s monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) blog series. I’m Anna Madlener, Senior Manager for MRV at Carbon to Sea...

Want to understand how the world’s first carbon credits for ocean alkalinity enhancement were issued? Anna Madlener — one of the new colleagues I’m extremely excited to work with at the Carbon to Sea Initiative — has you covered:
www.carbontosea.org/2025/11/25/a...

26.11.2025 15:37 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 1

The assessment includes ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) as a mCDR approach, but the field trials that are reported involved different chemical compositions of the feedstock to achieve the alkalinity addition.

19.11.2025 20:17 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Yes, to my understanding these numbers represent reported activities with the direct purpose to achieve CDR. But I'll confirm this with the colleagues from the @stateofcdr.bsky.social , and ask how liming / wastewater treatment are considered.

14.11.2025 21:32 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Great progress! Maybe resolve more decimals places to make the orders of magnitude between conventional and novel CDR comparable? Could be done at least in the data file.

14.11.2025 21:14 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Many thanks to @pfriedling.bsky.social for leading the effort, and @jhauck.bsky.social and Peter Landschützer for onboarding my to the GCB ocean team. It was a great experience to be part of this community.

13.11.2025 13:14 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

🔬 Strengthening and expanding our global carbon flux observing systems across the ocean, atmosphere, and land seems more important than ever. @wmo-global.bsky.social

13.11.2025 13:14 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Post image

⚖️ Despite advances in understanding the global carbon cycle, the 2024 budget imbalance is one of the largest in six decades, due to an overestimate of atm. CO₂ growth or of land and/or ocean sinks.
This underscores major challenges in tracking carbon-cycle changes and detecting emerging shifts.

13.11.2025 13:14 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

🔧 We also included ocean-based carbon dioxide removal (CDR) estimates for the first time. These fluxes are still tiny compared to CO₂ emissions, but we wanted to start documenting their growth. Thanks to Kirsty Harrington from the @stateofcdr.bsky.social report for sharing updated 2024 estimates.

13.11.2025 13:14 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0