maar of het nou een engels sprekend handje is of een nederlands sprekend handje, een kinderhand is gauw gevuld.
11.03.2026 08:23
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
maar of het nou een engels sprekend handje is of een nederlands sprekend handje, een kinderhand is gauw gevuld.
daar horen ze er geeneens meer van op, als er weer eens iemand onzin staat te verkondigen.
Marlies haar armpjes rijzen te berge en ze slaakt kreetjes van genot. Hans is een NETHERLANDER, maar het is allemaal ENGELS!! dan sta je niet versteld, maar dan ben je BLOWN AWAY!! kreetjes slaken. dat zag je ze bij Laurens Zuigmenader nou nooit doen. daar zijn ze er al lang aan gewend.
Marlies zit ook wel eens in d'r psi te neuzen, in de keuken, terwijl de thee staat te trekken als ranzige Ad zelf er een op bezoek heeft. dan leest ze Dante, want die kon heel mooi schrijven. maar nu is het Marlies, die aan de teentjes van Hans mag sabbelen!
Hans heeft dat kunstje afgekeken, tot groot plezier van Marlies en van de kijkertjes, en van Hans zelf, die eindelijk eens kan laten zien wat 'ie écht kan, in de veilige, warme beslotenheid van de corpsballentent van ranzige Ad.
want marlies is helemaal blown away.
in amerika is het omgekeerd. daar is iedereen zo onvoorstelbaar schaapachtig dom dat ze allemaal al lang weten dat die woorden de meest onzinnige dingen kunnen betekenen, en dat je daar eindeloos over kan doorzaniken.
nederland is een land waar de mensen zo onvoorstelbaar schaapachtig dom zijn dat de onvoorstelbaar domme Hans aan Marlies van het ondergoed moet gaan uitleggen wat de vreselijk moeilijke woorden 'materialisme' en 'idealisme' nou precies betekenen,
youtu.be/jEPjfqEw0nk
we know how much Swedenborg fascinated him isn't it. and angered.
the question is only if it was Swedenborg who angered him, or Kant.
what he (inevitably) did NOT notice is that his 'noumenon' is a misnomer for EVERYTHING that his philosophy did NOT include, and hence an empty word.
it's also why i posted the comment on the contest... Kant's 'prize essays' where an introduction to a philosophy that's literally an illusion, but a carefully formulated illusion. an illusion that includes 'everything' - apart from the noumenon.
well you're clearly past the 'common' depth.
i had to, but if you would, you would probably have felt same as me.
because newton's 'infinity' and 'infinitely small' was not 'real' infinity. he just needed the concepts, as a stopgap, to arrive at a simple set of formulas. to conquer the physical world, at the cost of the mental world.
*when you think of the elephants like Geoffrey thought of the elephants and you insist that they 'really' exist (that happens too!), you would call that an 'illusion'.
language is not hard, but for philosophers, it's sometimes hard.
(since dogs, and so many other creatures, are famous for unfalsifiability, etc )
tail wagging, you will either accept your dog as always, as a familiar reality, or, when you're a little high for instance, you will verify by one of the common methods.
when you first go check if they're actual pink elephants, because if there aren't, you can be pretty sure that you only think of them, but normal people don't even need that. on the other hand, when you 'hallucinate' your dog, approaching you,
>>
see it like this.
you can, of course, also VOLUNtarily see things that don't exist. little pink elephants, for instance, that float in front of you. when you think of such a scenery, they immediately conjure up into existence. Geoffrey Hinton thinks that it helps,
>>
P. S. @anilseth.bsky.social the neuroscience of consciousness & perception is simpler than you think! it's good however to keep in mind that 'hallucinating' is when you suddenly (i. e. involuntarily) see things that don't exist.
>>
good you didn't :)
psineuzelaars!
you'd almost begin to respect Bobby. for never giving in.
wat je ook zei, Laurens Zuigmenader liet zich nimmer nader zuigen. maar neem nou Hans! Hans sabbelt zich vast als zo'n tandeloze karper, aan de teentjes van iedereen die een beetje in z'n psi zit te neuzen.
Bobby Suckmecloser completed his compendium saying that our only hope is some god and some hereafter. but that does not satisfy Hans, the omnipresent sycophant in the room!
Hans is as impressed as always!
it would be funny it it was not tragic.
anyways ;)
and as soon as contraction works, expansion works too.
just not the 'cartesian' way
infinity is a process, you don't need to go to the 'end of infinity' to observe it (to live in infinity)
the line as a shrunken plane. the single point as a shrunken line. like Euclides, if fact.
you can observe it at the bones of the skeleton. Hegel felt it a little
it's like Dedekind did not 'derive' the (number) line from the single point, but from a plane
thoughts are fundamentally planar, but precisely because of that, they can follow (identify with) the process to higher dimensionalities
and to the lower
they obey laws
but more like 'obeying musical laws'
and it's NOT a brain process
