Where is this "core part" located and how can it be recognised medically?
Wouldn't it be dangerous for a medical org to treat a male person as they would a woman?
What if he got prostate cancer but it was ignored because women don't have a prostate?
Yes, but in what way are "trans women" women?
What explanation have these 'major medical ...organisations' given to back that assertion?
And what did the psychological orgs say about it and why would it be relevant to the question?
Fix it how?
So that I don't care about men punching women for sport while people like you and Noah cheer on?
No thanks.
Is this the one where he pretends that skinny men being "allowed" to box means that men should be allowed to hit women if they want to?
Have fun in upside down world.
Over and out.
I might believe that if people all over the internet weren't claiming to have changed sex.
Telling children & young people who don't relate to the patriarchal stereotypes for their sex that they can help themselves by altering +/or damaging their bodies is neither caring nor supportive.
I'm denying nobody the right to be what you are however works for you (& respects the rights of others).
"Dress however you please.
Call yourself whatever you like.
Sleep with any consenting adult who’ll have you.
Live your best life in peace and security."
But no human ever changed sex.
Then why would anyone have to "change sex" to make their sex "match" their gender?
That doesn't answer how an internal state can be "decided by society" far less how society's decisions could make it necessary to irreversibly change the body to "match".
There are 2 sexes and only 2.
There are infinite ways to be what you are.
There is no way to be what you're not.
Sex & gender are different (except where gender is used as a euphemism for sex).
Male, female, man, woman, boy girl - all words that pick out the *sex* of the individual.
How could something "decided by society" also be an inner essential true identity known only to the person?
Again, not me. Reality.
We need words so we can talk about concepts but the underlying concepts the words describe don't change even if the words do.
If there wasn't a word to describe a human female, we would still exist & it would still be impossible for a male to become one.
Nature is gatekeeping, not me.
Thats not female puberty.
Those things happen in females as a result of hormones that are produced during puberty.
Those things are not puberty.
A male body cannot undergo female puberty.
A male human cannot become female.
Unless you are female, you cannot know what it is to be female. And vice versa.
I'm basing it on evidence.
You claim that a male child who goes immediately onto female hormones/testosterone suppression after puberty blockade will go thru female puberty.
That is straightforwardly false.
A male developing female typical features bc of drugs taken is not becoming female.
I know more than you do.
How old are you?
Good grief! Who told you this tripe?
Puberty is the process of the body reaching sexual maturation aka adulthood.
Reproductive organs mature and begin producing mature gametes.
A boy cannot go thru female puberty bc he has testes, not ovaries.
A body is a living system, not a bundle of random parts
The idea of a male body undergoing female puberty is completely made up.
The idea that sex is ever changeable is completely made up.
None of these things is true.
Who told you them and why did you believe them?
That is false. A male child cannot undergo female puberty or vice versa.
No child *needs* to have this critical developmental stage blocked.
The most effective cure for "gender distress" is puberty. Normal puberty.
Blocking it is unconscionable irreversible harm. Always.
I'm not referring to the evidence, such as it is, directly in this thread.
I'm pointing out that you're relying on evidence about an entirely different situation to make your claim.
The safety or otherwise of pbs for precocious puberty is completely irrelevant to their use for "gender distress".
You're making assumptions and you're overlooking the fact that what evidence exists suggests that children given pbs for "gender distress" almost all go right on to hormones and so never go through the critical maturation of puberty.
Not. Comparable. At. All.
Younger (too young for puberty), different diagnosis, as short a time as possible to delay puberty so that this *critical development process* can take place at the right time.
Not comparable in any way.
No, there isn't.
The quality of the "evidence" is very low.
Researchers have even suppressed unfavourable results.
The pb evidence you're referring to is for a different usage at a different time in a different cohort. Irrelevant to "gender care".
Blocking me doesn't make what I said untrue or irrelevant.
It's nothing to do with a "pause". Studies that have been published showed most going on to hormones.
It's to make it easier for the boys to "pass" as women when they're adults.
I don't think it helps the girls to "pass" as much but they're female so activists don't care about them.
The safety of a drug is not a property of the drug itself, separated from the purpose, timing and duration of its administration and the cohort to whom it is given.
And, of course, the rest of the pathway of which it is part, as the case may be.
It's a nonsense question.
We have written about the cognitive dissonance of certain MSPs, Epstein, grooming gangs, the Nordic Model survivors, and AshRegan's #unbuyable bill.
forwomen.scot/16/02/2026/t...
Men are not a minority.
Men claiming to be women are not vulnerable.
The misconceptions are yours.
I have more enjoyable things to do than waste more time correcting them.
Good night.
Right. It's not about feeling like something you're not bc that isnt a thing.
It's about claiming to feel like something you're not.
And Wikipedia isn't a credible "science" source. Stop wasting your time posting that link.
