Liangzu Peng

Got precisely this response as an author:

Thanks for your responses. I maintain my score (5).

Similarly: Top Reviewer is a recognition I had used in my cv as that's how the conference names it. Some conference uses "Highlighted Reviewer", which is more appropriate

Thanks for the list. I am just following each of them no brainers

I had the suspicion for "top 2% papers" listed for oral papers accepted to conferences. Imo "2% acceptance rate" is more accurate and honest. This is only a minor concern of mine. Perhaps people didn't think that much when they say "top"