As I said, military alliance is needed. All those countries are in Europe. We can be allies with those countries. But also as Monbiot said, Trump has started an illegal war. Ally with a country whose leader starts illegal wars? That's illogical.
As I said, military alliance is needed. All those countries are in Europe. We can be allies with those countries. But also as Monbiot said, Trump has started an illegal war. Ally with a country whose leader starts illegal wars? That's illogical.
If America invades Greenland, like Trump threatens to do, NATO countries will have to go to war with the USA. Does that sound like NATO is working? I agree military alliance are needed, and that's exactly what Zack Polanski has advocated. Just not NATO, for the reason above.
Not true.
And expecting Donald Trump not to start illegal wars isn't?
People think that they're not strong because they're so slender, but they can easily pull folks over like this because they're basically all muscle!
Oh yes.......cats, squirrels, rabbits.......if they see them they'll go, so you learn to hold on tight!
Thank you for making such a long trip!
Thank you, but I don't know about a marvellous job! Just about holding it all together is the truth!
๐
Olive, Judy, William and Forrest ๐
There's actually 4 greyhound in there! One is hiding behind Han!
Welcome ๐๐ป๐
BOOM!
I agree that the right vote is now more split than it's ever been, and the political spectrum is split up more evenly nowadays
Fair comment. Certainly Farage's public profile being raised by various media organisations has enabled his views to be accepted more broadly. My main concern is they seem to have topped out at 30%ish, but if normalised further could create a broader coalition.
Agreed. It is somewhat involved because it feels radical. Not easy to put on a simple-to-understand leaflet. Needs the party's best communicators to talk about it with the cut-through messages. But the party has great communicators and will find a way for this excellent policy to get broad support.
Hannah? I can confidently say she wouldn't.
There can be no environmental justice without social, racial and economic justice. Addressing one problem almost always means that you're also chipping away at another.
Absolutely. Different things resonate with different people, and the localism aspect is easier when it's a by-election. But I do agree with the message that started with Zack but has become somewhat broader Green Party messaging.
And the important thing is that you recognise it! So thank you for that. Get too much of the "woke nonsense" or "political correctness police" when I point this stuff out. So appreciate your acknowledgement here ๐
It's a concern though. Farage and Reform get normalised by stealth if there's a much more radical right in the picture.
๐ข
*tradesperson ๐
I understand what you're saying but disagree. Zack often talks about the environment being very far down people's priorities when you can't afford the basics of life. G&D is one of the most deprived constituencies in the country. Talking about the environment would have been out of touch.
๐ฏ
If it wasn't Labour, they'd have been saying something about it immediately. But they didn't. Silence speaks volumes in this instance.
If it wasn't Labour, they'd have been saying something about it immediately. But they didn't. Silence speaks volumes in this instance.
@zackpolanski.bsky.social : "Once again Reform are spreading misinformation & smears, and the press & the media seem to repeat them.. its really important that the media.. take responsibility so when Reform or Farage says something they don't just keep repeating it"๐๐๐
Pretty rare for them to lose half their vote and get pushed out into third though.
And a focus on Labour losing the by-election, rather than the Greens winning it.