@manuelsuter
Postdoctoral Researcher at Lund University Research in Behavioral Ecological Economics, Sufficiency and Post-Growth Currently working on attractive future visions considering planetary boundaries and citizens views.
@ketanjoshi.co @michaelemann.bsky.social @michaelmezz.bsky.social @rahmstorf.bsky.social @kimberlynicholas.bsky.social @jasonhickel.bsky.social @doctorvive.bsky.social @georgemonbiot.bsky.social @kateraworth.bsky.social @mazzucatom.bsky.social @andrewlfanning.bsky.social
Just published in @theconversation.com: "Economists and environmental scientists see the world differently β hereβs why that matters"
theconversation.com/economists-a...
That sounds great, thanks a lot!
Very interesting! We recently published a paper about climate action delay discourses in elite sport: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...
@manuelsuter.bsky.social & @kimberlynicholas.bsky.social Three cheers for your new article! I particularly appreciate your point that applied climate advocacy research soothes our troubled souls.
Here's the @mason4c.bsky.social take on applied comms research: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Thank you for making me aware of this article. What you do at Mason 4C would have been a great case to include in our piece!
@katharinehayhoe.com @michaelemann.bsky.social @rahmstorf.bsky.social @kevinclimate.bsky.social @frediotto.bsky.social
In our new opinion piece in PLOS Climate, we argue that researchers are leaving a potentially powerful lever for climate stability underused:
Combining research with advocacy through field experiments.
journals.plos.org/climate/arti...
How can elite sport become a climate leader?
Read more about the barriers and how to overcome them in our new study:
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...
NEW STUDY: Economists and environmental researchers differ in their perceptions of the most relevant environmental issues and mitigation approaches
Study link:
iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1...
On day 9 of our #PLOSClimateCountdown, we're highlighting research by @manuelsuter.bsky.social, @colognaviktoria.bsky.social, @naomioreskes.bsky.social and colleagues:
"Green growth beliefs: Investigating factors associated with expert opinions on green growth"
π journals.plos.org/climate/arti...
π’New Pre-Print available: Sustainability researchers endorse post-growth policy instruments for the European Unionπ’
This is the main finding of our survey with 1,734 sustainability policy researchers across 97 countries.
osf.io/preprints/so...
Our newly published study suggests that a cognitive bias toward additive climate solutions (e.g., buy electric car) may limit how visible and widely adopted high-impact subtractive strategies like flying less or driving less become.
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
β»οΈ New paper in Journal of Environmental Psychology π
We examined subtraction neglect β the tendency to prioritize additive over subtractive climate strategies (e.g., buying an EV vs. flying less) when thinking about effective personal actions. Check it out! π
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Medicare for All - "That's socialism!"
Social Security - "That's socialism!"
Debt free education - "That's socialism!"
Universal childcare - "That's socialism!"
$1 trillion+ in tax cuts for the wealthy...
"That's just how it is."
Read the full study (open access) here: www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
π§ Food for thought: If a small card on a restaurant table can reduce waste by 16 percentage points, imagine what we could do at scale.
Implications:
πΉ Restaurants can reduce food waste (and costs) with simple, low-cost interventions like table prompts or messages on menus.
πΉ These changes donβt hurt the guest experience.
π’ Key finding: Making guests aware of food waste reduced the likelihood of leaving food behind (self-reported food waste by guests) by 16 percentage points compared to the control group.
We tested two interventions:
1οΈβ£ A gentle reminder placed on dining tables to raise awareness of food waste.
2οΈβ£ The same reminder, but with added guidance on portion sizes.
Around 75% of food waste in the hospitality industry is avoidable.
Our recent field experiment in a Copenhagen Γ la carte restaurant explored whether informational nudges can reduce food waste at the table. π§΅
β¨New paper out β¨
What are effects of scientists engaging in climate protests?
Our findings suggest that it does not compromising their credibility (across political affiliations), and that such actions may have less impact than one would like to believe: royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/...
NSF Grant Termination Information Collection Form Please use this form to submit information identifying specific NSF grants that have been cancelled for any reason after January 20, 2025. We are tracking these grants to increase transparency, organize affected PIs, and facilitate responses, including via litigation. Please share the form as widely as possible with your networks. We are actively building a pipeline to organize these terminations and will soon have a tracker akin to our NIH grant tracker at https://airtable.com/appjhyo9NTvJLocRy/shrNto1NNp9eJlgpA WE WILL NOT DISCLOSE THE IDENTITY OF ANYONE WHO USES THIS FORM TO PROVIDE INFORMATION. We will keep your identity confidential. These resources are maintained by Noam Ross of rOpenSci and Scott Delaney of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, with input and support from additional volunteers. For any questions, please contact Scott Delaney on Signal (sdelaney.84). THANK YOU FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE!
π¨Report your NSF grant terminations! π¨
We are starting to collect information on NSF grant terminations to create a shared resource as we have for NIH. The more information we collect, the more we can organize, advocate, and fight back! Please share widely!
airtable.com/appGKlSVeXni...
We asked 3,000+ researchers from 101 countries if global green growth (i.e. sustainable economic growth) is possible. 59% said yes. π
Green growth endorsement was linked to beliefs that economic growth is key to human well-being. Thanks to @manuelsuter.bsky.social for leading this study! π
"[Tend] to agree that economic growth is essential to increase peopleβs well-being."
"tend to disagree that green growth can keep global warming below 2 Β°C"
But the IPCC states that even 2Β°C is considered dangerous & poses a significant threat to human well-being π€
Something doesn't add up!
Link to Journal Article: journals.plos.org/climate/arti...
π The article has been published in the journal PLOS Climate (open access, see link below). A big thank you to my fantastic co-authors Noel Strahm, Till Bundeli, Kaja Kaessner, Viktoria Cologna, Oreskes Naomi, and Sebastian Berger.
π Our findings suggest that, despite its widespread political popularity, there is no global scientific consensus on the viability of global green growth.
πΉGreen growth endorsement was most strongly assosciated with the belief that sustained economic growth is essential for human well-being. This may imply that green growth beliefs among researchers are influenced by ideology.