Most accurate portrait of modern culture currently available
@noupside
๐Studies influence, propaganda, platform design@Georgetown โ๐ผLawfare,The Atlantic ๐Invisible Rulers: The People Who Turn Lies Into Reality (invisiblerulers.com) โhow influencers, algorithms, &online crowds shape public opinion ๐ฆน๐ปโโ๏ธTwitter Files supervillain
Most accurate portrait of modern culture currently available
You did an awesome job getting it this far
Mike Benz โ Frame Game โ laying out his operating philosophy in his own voice.
A pathological liar who duped one rube after another. Matt Taibbi. Jacob Siegel. They legitimized him, then never walked back anything they wrote. Just quietly pretended theyโd never taken him seriously as a source lol.
Did you know the CIA & Army engaged in a shootout in Germany over servers that had the REAL vote count?
No bc it never happened. But โreal vote count is on a server elsewhereโ is the sort of thing youโre likely to hear again when they tell us voting machines are โsuspectโ to justify their EO.
Since we got โIran interfered in the election!โ as a justification for war, have Maduro sitting in jail, and Tulsi was snuffling around Georgia looking for โevidenceโ of god knows whatโhere are the Chinese, Vezuelan, Italian, Iranian, etc conspiracy theories liars in power are dredging back up. ๐ก๐ป๐ณ๏ธ
Playing a family game of Clue and the 5yo is contributing by periodically just yelling MUSTARD!!! like sheโs Kendrick.
You need to read this thread
Jay Bhattacharya should not have been allowed anywhere near NIH leadership
He has shownโover & overโthat he will impede the careers of early career researchers
He told my Duke colleague, a young post-doc who studies health disparities, that his science was โbadโ
โDonโt pick a fight with Jay please, Renee.โ โ the fight was โpickedโ in the opposite direction. They were afraid of him. And here we are.
He spoke at NatCon โ I was in the audience. It was a whole bunch of whining about how 1A was dead because SCOTUS tossed his bullshit case.
Jay is a perpetually aggrieved bullshit artist and Stanford treated him with kid gloves while asking us not to defend ourselves against his accusations.
Kari Lake, incompetent and also unlawfully appointed? Happy Saturday night.
www.washingtonpost.com/business/202...
Thanks! Heโs 3, I hope it gets longer. His dad had a full mane.
Yup
A blue smoke Maine coon with ear tufts looks at the camera from inside a small box
He is too big for the box but determined to make it work.
#Caturday. Behemoth squeezes himself into a box.
Those playgrounds are all over this isnโt hard to find
Under Secretary ... This is a great complement to @X's community notes system, which results in less "reach" (thus monetization) for content annotated as inaccurate. You don't need a Ministry of Truth to incentivize truth online. Nikita Bier & @nikitabier โข Mar 3 Today we are revising our Creator Revenue Sharing policies to maintain authenticity of content on Timeline and prevent manipulation of the program.
Happy to see Sarah Rogers, who was lying in a hearing yesterday ab Stanford Internet Observatory being part of a cabal of Stasi NGOS (what?), come out in support of my past argument ab โfreedom of speech not freedom of reachโ & the importance of supplementing CN w/ incentives. Glad we agree, Sarah!
Sayer Ji is the GreenMedInfo nut who was married to womenโs wellness nut Kelly Brogan.
Ji is currently a try-hard trying to get Imran Ahmed deported, too.
Someone needs to explain this to Elon Musk too tbh
Yeah I donโt really understand the point of those stunts either tbh except perhaps showing skeptics that itโs capable of a lot more than they might think? For reproducibility those sorts of things could bc interesting.
I have avoided this debate aside from reading the Substacks bc Iโm not really part of the academy in the way you all are but โthe peer-reviewed journal article as a primary unit of academic production is indeed probably deadโ โ I do believe this is true. And AI is a useful tool for subtasks atm.
This list and more at eipartnership.net/report
His account didnโt get taken down. His tweets stayed up. Did they get labeled? Maybe, I donโt care enough to go look atm. But a label isnโt censorship โ thatโs also more speech.
When MAGA says โfree speechโ they mean for them, to lie, without the bare minimum of pushback. Everyone sees that now.
She also said she used to be Charlie Kirkโs lawyer ๐ & that we put him on a โcensorship listโ.
No, sweetheart. We made a list of top bullshitters in the 2020 election AFTER the election, by looking at who spread what rumors. Your boy was on it. ๐คท๐ปโโ๏ธ
Pointing that out isnโt โcensorshipโ itโs speech.
Under Secretary ... This is a great complement to @X's community notes system, which results in less "reach" (thus monetization) for content annotated as inaccurate. You don't need a Ministry of Truth to incentivize truth online. Nikita Bier & @nikitabier โข Mar 3 Today we are revising our Creator Revenue Sharing policies to maintain authenticity of content on Timeline and prevent manipulation of the program.
Happy to see Sarah Rogers, who was lying in a hearing yesterday ab Stanford Internet Observatory being part of a cabal of Stasi NGOS (what?), come out in support of my past argument ab โfreedom of speech not freedom of reachโ & the importance of supplementing CN w/ incentives. Glad we agree, Sarah!
Mark Twain, yeah? Ben Franklin. Or Lincoln.
Good. More of this.
www.idahostatesman.com/news/northwe...
The NYT is too afraid of offending conspiratorial populist freeloaders to use plain language.
They have religious exemptions. That means the parents are liars, tbc, because no major religions object to vaccinesโฆbut they do usually have moral objections to lying!
People lying ab their religion are putting other peopleโs kids & the broader community at risk in schools w/21% MMR uptake rates.
On February 22, 2026, Naval Ravikant tweeted: "If you're unwilling to defend your country in time of war, then you're a tourist, not a citizen." As of March 3, 2026, the tweet has been deleted.
deleted his tweet as soon as an actual war popped off
Tillis: You decided to kill that dog because you had not invested the appropriate time in training it, and then you have the audacity to say itโs a leadership lesson. You killed a goat and said it was behaving badly. Youโre a farmer โ you donโt castrate a goat, they behave badly.
Did you read the article you shared? Idk I thought it was obvious why this is Bad Actually.