Is erasure the new prevention? Quite the methodology you have there, thinking that removing certain medical vocabulary amounts to prevention. It's like a 3 year old who thinks that what he can't see doesn't exist.
during its early years. Students would regularly get messages from criminal enterprises asking to lend their card for a few days in exchange for cash compensation.
In summary: this is a disaster in the making. It's a matter of WHEN rather than IF the house of cards will collapse.
It doesn't have a good culture in terms of monitoring and it has in the past not shied away from using job applications to gain insight - without having to pay of course - on how to improve its control environment. It has long been established to have been the preferred bank of organised crime
Let's start with company culture. Very gung-ho and equally toxic. It's C-suite changes drastically practically every year. It's financial controls to detect and prevent illegal activity (financial crime prevention, proceeds of crime, money laundering, terrorism financing) are unreliable.
satisfied the PRAs queries and made the necessary adjustments. Now, I say PRA, but I suspect that it was granted the full license (it had a limited one) adter some ministerial pressure from Rachel Reeves. It's no secret she was in favour. So what is the problem you might ask. Well, where to begin!
#UK #Politics The UK government has really given up all pretence of being on the consumer's side. As the Guardian reports that the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has confirmed that Revolut now operates under a full banking license in the UK. Revolut had applied in 2021 and seems to now have
They already removed the quality measures last year. Then supposedly to update them in line with cass. At the start of the year the proposed date for new ones was December 2026. This is pre-planned. NICE doesn't even have gender incongruence or gender dysphoria in its documentation anymore.
#UK #NHS #Transrights These are some of the people who may have been involved in the "rapid review" that let to the insane decision to ban healthcare for trans youth. "solutions for Public Health" www.sph.nhs.uk/about-us/our...
And this seems to all come from within Arden & Gem. It's the multi disciplinary team which call themselves "Solutions for public health". I'm trying to find out who's a part of it. I have a few suspicions but nothing factual just yet.
#UK #Transrights In case anyone wants to know who launched the attack on trans people's healthcare in the uk, it is the General Medical Council (GMC) who are the eons behind this latest episode.
the sex discrimination act, but somehow "forget" about Statutory Instrument 2467 which defines sex discrimination and puts in writing that a GRC is the EXACT OPPOSITE of what you put in your verdict. I'd call you despicable, but that would be too much honour for what you are: As corrupt as the gov't
#UK #Transrights @supremecourt.uk was it pure incompetence on your part or was Policy Exchange correct to claim that the judiciary is captured? Except for the latter, you are clearly captured by the gender critical hate mob. Explain this: How is it that you lift the definition of man and woman from
Let's see if you have any humanity left. You were elected to serve the people. Trans people are people too.
which is responsible for the management of the data classification at NHS was never even spoken to. And yes, I went over that team's meeting minutes for a period of 2 years without EVER any mention of Sullivan or MBM joining or asking questions. With all that in mind I urge you to take action.
had any qualification regarding data management and ALL of them had already provided very biased input on the very characteristics they were asked to research, the report is neither useable nor objective and most certainly not independent. Their report mentions NHS data at length and yet the team
Labour who really embraced them and then enacted whatever they wanted. And speaking about Alice Sullivan, when you get the deputy chief of Operations at UCL to ignore the high risk that they posed and then cover it up with the help of the ICO, to promote a report written by a team where NONE
Labour government has not just embarked on a genocidal track, it has acceleratted it at unseen pace, helped by corrupt MPs who favour Evangelical Christo-fascist organisations and have the audacity to pretend to care purely for clickbait. The Tories have set us up with Cass and Sullivan, but it was
Baroness Merron, Mary-Ann Stephenson ALL have DIRECT LINES OF COMMUNICATION with Sex Matters, Bayswater group, LGB Alliance, inviting them to set policies. The letter sent from MHRA to the clinical trial is almost literally a repeat of the points they were sent by Bayswater group.
I really have to wonder how an entire chamber can suffer collective amnesia like that. It is utterly appalling stuff what has happened here. Let it be clear that the government is indeed captured, but it is the gender critical hate mob that have your attention. DHSC, MHRA, Wes Streeting,
@bphillipsonmp.bsky.social @kateosbornemp.bsky.social @sarahowen.org.uk See above. This is pretty scandalous. And I can add to this the many log files about the Equality Act 2010 where in the discussions in the House of Lords speakers consistently used the term gender. Without objections anywhere.
#Transrights #UK And here is Statutory Instrument 2005 nr 2467 with the EXACT wording making it clear that those with a GRC are to be considered as their acquired gender and not natal sex. It is pretty damning for the Supreme Court that they either missed it or purposely ignored it.
@jolyon.goodlawproject.org @translucent.org.uk @mimmymum.bsky.social @owenjones.bsky.social @clairestranstalks.bsky.social @transmediawatch.bsky.social @transwrites.world @hleehurley.com @whatthetrans.com @wearequeeraf.com @pinknews.bsky.social
files and carefully store them to make sure they remain available. Could this not be grounds to have the verdict rescinded? Also, it is rather surprising that nobody in the House of Lords has commented on this, given that the report was by cross-parliamentarian workgroup "European Union Committee".
as an expansive term to include trans people in the classes of male and female. All this evidence is dated AFTER the reference that Supreme Court used when referring to the sex and their interpretation of what it meant for the Equality Act. I have taken the opportunity to download all the evidence
evidence to support that point, mentioning how they were at that time out of step with most European countries. Also, that interpretation is further supported by all subsequent discussions in the House of Lords about the Equality Act 2010. Each time sex differences are mentioned they use "gender"
Earlier today I found in the national archives undisputable evidence showing that the Supreme Court were wrong in their interpretation. The explanatory memorandum is clear about a GRC effectively meaning that someone is of the sex they acquired. And the explanatory note linked in it further provides
@bphillipsonmp.bsky.social @kateosbornemp.bsky.social see the evidence I provide in this skeet. It shows beyond doubt that the Supreme Court either wilfully ignored the evidence or simply didn't properly look into the matter. But without a doubt their statement about "biological sex" was FALSE.
This has been quite the Sunday. First finding the evidence that the Supreme Court was dead wrong in their verdict and then getting hit with a full on ban.
That consistent messaging is Cass' playbook. Noteworthy is that again Sex Matters' Helen Joyce is being asked for comment. Unsurprisingly they are already pushing fot a total ban. Is it sinking in yet that these are rabid genocidal extremists? 😡The article: www.standard.co.uk/news/health/...
