Trending
ButItRuns's Avatar

ButItRuns

@butitruns

It might be ugly, But It Runs! Automotive and Electrical Engineer and fledgling content creator. I'll do it right, or not at all. YT: youtube.com/@butitruns Tw: twitch.tv/butitplays

123
Followers
142
Following
1,405
Posts
16.12.2024
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by ButItRuns @butitruns

Question: Are we working on narrowband, stackable, polarized photovoltaics?

Because we really SHOULD be.

#solar #future #ideas #teehee

14.03.2026 12:47 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

You know what the LLM bubble is about?

Not ease of use

Not helping anything

It's about moving ALL of your YOU off site. Storing your existence on public hardware. Free for anyone to access.

It's about control. Never forget that

14.03.2026 12:42 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

The squircle can go wither in every single pit of hell for all eternity. Bring back usefulness and utility over false aesthetics

14.03.2026 12:33 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I'll agree. I refuse to bus, train, etc. Humans REEK.

But, more importantly, I don't take interstates. I drive exclusively back roads, dirt roads, farm roads. No bus is showing me all this cool shizz in the country, at my pace. Simply not possible.

13.03.2026 12:44 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Gimme the 29F. NOW!! Put it in the bag, and noone gets shaved.

13.03.2026 04:17 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Ngl, you had me in the first half 🀣🀣

12.03.2026 12:38 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Genuinely curious how many ppl do or don't get this🀣

12.03.2026 12:22 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

NOT THE RADIOACTIVE WASTE 🀣🀣

12.03.2026 04:12 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Question: on production vehicles manufactured for the USDM

HOW ARE MULTI FUNCTION SINGLE LIGHTS STILL A THING???

Your taillight housing needs dedicated brake and turn lights, man. What is this, 1947?

Do better OEMs.

12.03.2026 04:06 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I haven't seen after Whitaker, the writing disappointed me so bad I cried and walked away.

The show has always been progressive, in a similar vein to Star Trek, BUT it's when the writers aren't coy about it, when they just come out and sufferage all over your face. That's when it's not great.

12.03.2026 03:45 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Not me, not reading further before replying🀣🀣

12.03.2026 03:43 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Fs, new entrants I recommend starting with Eccelston, and ending with Capaldi.

So sad we lost so many of the originals from the 50-60s.

12.03.2026 03:42 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I certainly hope so. Unless an aerospace airframe engineer wants to step in and design a proper carriage, they should remain terrifying memories of poor handling days past.

11.03.2026 12:40 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

My recommendation would be to stop at the end of Capaldi, tbh. Whitakers tenure was totally ruined by the same failure that plagued Sylvester McCoy, very poor writing.

I'm certain Whitaker could've been phenomenal, had that not happened.

11.03.2026 12:37 πŸ‘ 9 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I suppose I never defined 'game ', did I? Curse you, Djinn dev, CURSE YOU

*insert Doofenschmirtz here*

11.03.2026 12:21 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Yes, exactly. The gaming community takes this reply as tacit agreement. You are now bound by...... something gamers pray to...
🀣

11.03.2026 12:15 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

So, finishing the one game, AND pumping out 3 others right?

RIGHT?!?!

🀣🀣

11.03.2026 04:41 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I feel that in my bones.

Digital huggzies and crossed fingies that everything smooths out swiftly. 😁❀️

11.03.2026 04:20 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

My existence in a nutshell:

I have a key ring. With 4 total keys. Two of these are of identical design.

Statistics say choosing randomly, I would choose correctly 50% of the time.

I'm at 5 of 43. Approx 10%

10% yes. 90% no.

My life, folks. In a nutshell.

11.03.2026 04:08 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Ah, but you may at least count yourself in a very small group of ppl who could make that distinction in the first place

10.03.2026 06:31 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Back in ye olden dais, you could physically massage an LCD element to recover dead cells, rarely.

Perhaps a heating cycle affected a similar effect?

09.03.2026 14:23 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

@steelpan.dev almost did this, I think? Comments, DevPerson(tm)? 🀣

09.03.2026 11:51 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

For anyone wondering, I am not streaming. In case I don't see chat, yanno?

I'm running a stress test with OBS because of the crashing last week. We'll see what happens.

09.03.2026 11:47 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

No, I get that. I was more ruminating on the likely other replies I assume the post would garner.

We can't make what we have work, how are we expected to expand that? 🀣🀣

08.03.2026 12:10 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

That and the sheer raw space that doesn't have public rail, that would have to get public rail installed.

It's almost like different cultures do things differently, and that's literally the entire reason cities, states, and countries exist in the first place

08.03.2026 05:33 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I think that's a good question for @eternalskies.neocities.org actuallyπŸ‘€πŸ‘€

07.03.2026 13:51 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Calling every car crash an "accident" really does wonders for absolving drivers and car companies of responsibility.

Hit a fully visible child on the side of the road? Accident

Drive drunk and speed then run a red light and t bone someone? Accident

Accidents happen, but negligence happens more

07.03.2026 10:51 πŸ‘ 64 πŸ” 13 πŸ’¬ 5 πŸ“Œ 1

I knew a guy once, made that same call

Arizona

Single ominous cloud in the sky

I told him to wait

Four of us, on bikes, 60mph, IN HAIL

🀣

07.03.2026 13:40 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I'VE BEEN SAYING THIS FOR YEARS.

99% of automotive collisions are NOT accidents.

Negligence, maliciousness, and ignorance are all identical in outcome here

And all should carry the same weight of culpability

07.03.2026 13:36 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Dunce-spired? Perhaps

07.03.2026 05:30 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0