How Trump’s EPA rollbacks give US states new tools in climate suits
Vermont and New York face high stakes to protect climate superfund laws as it faces attacks from Trump’s DoJ
"The administration cannot claim the federal government’s ability to enact greenhouse gas regulations precludes states’ authority to pass climate superfund laws while claiming it has no statutory authority to regulate emissions" @theclf.bsky.social yes
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...
09.03.2026 11:31
👍 11
🔁 4
💬 0
📌 1
Nature Report, Killed by Trump, Is Released Independently
Keeping us informed. We need assessments that are independent and fearless. Thank you.
www.nytimes.com/2026/03/05/c...
07.03.2026 13:02
👍 17
🔁 3
💬 0
📌 0
Huh. Good point.
06.03.2026 02:12
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
NOAA plans to roll back protections for endangered right whales
NOAA aims to undo vessel-speed regulation that protects endangered North Atlantic right whales, instead looking at real-time detection alternatives.
Congratulations, anti-wind group people who supported this president.
Ship strikes and entanglement in fishing gear are the leading cause of death of this highly endangered species. And the administration is raising the speed limit
www.savannahnow.com/story/news/e...
04.03.2026 22:24
👍 21
🔁 8
💬 1
📌 0
Trump has launched an unprecedented assault on the environment. Where’s the pushback?
Climate deniers expected more resistance to the fossil fuel blitz. But Democrats, billionaires and activists have gone silent
Hello? Anybody home?
Climate "hushing" and avoidance has allowed Trump and the fossil industry to destroy decades of effort.
Where is the climate movement? Where are the Democratic politicians?
Vast majorities are concerned about climate change.
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
04.03.2026 22:09
👍 75
🔁 45
💬 6
📌 5
What happening to winter?
Five degrees warmer now.
Thanks to Ryan Katz-Rosene
03.03.2026 15:09
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Ahh that explains it—the full series clearly has a lower average. And right back to the year of my birth, so I find 1961 a completely sensical baseline!
03.03.2026 15:06
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
These are great, but the averages in the warming stripes one seems to not be of the whole series, is that right?
02.03.2026 13:35
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Thanks much, Ryan. Appreciate your time
02.03.2026 13:31
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Let’s get clarification on what the “average” being cited is. Climate is the trend, weather is short term
02.03.2026 00:07
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Regulators rely on fossil fuel industry data. How often is it wrong?
From Colorado to Texas, government officials are grappling with concerns about unreliable reports from oil and gas companies.
"The major problem, analysts and environmental groups say, is that governments often lack the staff and resources to properly vet data — making it difficult for agencies to track how accurate the data and reports they receive are."
www.eenews.net/articles/reg...
01.03.2026 23:26
👍 18
🔁 7
💬 1
📌 2
Could you do a graphic like that for Providence and Boston? People need context
01.03.2026 23:30
👍 4
🔁 0
💬 2
📌 0
“The pollutant, released from burning fossil fuels, can trigger asthma attacks, cause bronchitis, and increase the risk of heart disease and stroke.”
28.02.2026 18:43
👍 7
🔁 6
💬 0
📌 0
Study links adoption of electric vehicles with less air pollution and improved health
Related News Study finds health disparities in PFAS levels linked to drinking water, food access and industrial pollution November 21, 2024
"At the zip code level, for every additional 20 ZEVs (Electric Vehicles) per 1,000 people, there was a 3.2% drop in the rate of asthma-related emergency visits and a small suggestive reduction in NO2 levels."
People may have seen this. Would love to see updated
keck.usc.edu/news/study-l...
27.02.2026 20:15
👍 11
🔁 2
💬 1
📌 0
"traditional energy states like Alaska, Montana, Texas, and Oklahoma also appear among the top Democratic sources for “Need Fossil Fuels” claims, while states like Arkansas and Michigan, with significant automotive and manufacturing interests, feature prominently in “Solutions Won’t Work” arguments.
27.02.2026 19:42
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 1
"2) separates the original “climate science is unreliable” into claims that attack climate science, data, and processes from those that attack climate scientists and other proponents of climate action."
27.02.2026 19:28
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
"Specifically, this revision 1) re-organizes and extends the “solutions won’t work” category, separating attacks on climate solutions from claims supporting the continued use of fossil fuels
27.02.2026 19:28
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
"For every one speech that included a contrarian claim from a Democrat, there were roughly 13 speeches that included a claim from Republicans.
..and those representing constituencies with higher fossil fuel employment or receiving more fossil fuel campaign contributions."
27.02.2026 19:23
👍 4
🔁 1
💬 1
📌 2
"We find that contrarian claims spike during major climate policy moments (1997, 2008-9, and 2015), with “solutions increase costs” comprising roughly one-third of all contrarian claims made."
27.02.2026 19:20
👍 4
🔁 2
💬 2
📌 0
US fossil fuel industry campaigns to kill policies that ban gas in new buildings
Oil and gas interests coordinate campaign to stop local and state policies, putting climate at risk, new report shows
InfluenceMap’s latest report analyzes the common playbook used by oil, gas & utilities to delay building electrification.
It shows how policies & public discourse were targeted by regionally tailored industry talking points - in the US, Australia and the EU.
Read more in @theguardian.com ⬇️
25.02.2025 10:24
👍 44
🔁 24
💬 1
📌 3
Last week “looks like a pretty well-orchestrated campaign against the ETS by parts of the European industry community, in an attempt to lower the bar for the upcoming ETS review,”
16.02.2026 22:28
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Republican State Legislators Rush to Limit Their Own Regulators
The dismantling of the state moves on to the subnational level.
gift article www.nytimes.com/2026/02/15/u...
16.02.2026 11:16
👍 5
🔁 2
💬 0
📌 0
planning on it. Machines with Magnets...in glorious Pawtucket.
16.02.2026 00:11
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Mark help us in New England with a comparison of what our prices would likely be.
16.02.2026 00:08
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0