Simulation studies are essential for methods research. How well are they conducted & reported? How can we improve their quality? Out now in Psychological Methods, see π§΅ below.
With @fbartos.bsky.social, @timpmorris.bsky.social, @boulesteixlaure.bsky.social, @danielheck.bsky.social & Samuel Pawel
18.11.2024 09:25
π 63
π 22
π¬ 4
π 2
Since I've been here for a whileβ¦ here are some useful features on Bluesky that you might not have discovered yet! π§΅
20.11.2024 19:44
π 1530
π 586
π¬ 253
π 87
What are your favourite books on longitudinal data analysis? My knowledge is so fragmented - would love something that ties everything together and shows how different methods relate!
19.11.2024 07:40
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Thanks Kou! +Preprint here: osf.io/preprints/ps... And if anyone wants to play around with trial or aggregated data of 820 participants who performed 9 cognitive tasks & personality trait scores, go wild: osf.io/kc9pb/
12.11.2024 09:03
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
A white and tan owl in the air, wings outstretched
American barn owl, about to dive πͺΆπ¦
πΈ: Coyote Hills
02.11.2024 20:38
π 608
π 54
π¬ 10
π 1
Idiographic Approaches in Psychology: Hold your horses
There have been persistent calls spurring psychologists to do more βidiographicβ research, starting even before Peter Molenaarβs βManifesto on Psychology as Idiographic Scienceβ, which is already 20 y...
New blog post! Three reasons why (some) idiographic studies in psych leave me unimpressed: (1) failure to establish that there's meaningful variation, (2) imprecise estimates at the individual level, (3) the usual estimand confusion (is it causal? yes/no/maybe a bit?).
www.the100.ci/2024/10/28/i...
28.10.2024 13:31
π 67
π 27
π¬ 7
π 3
THE SIMPSONS PARADOX
30.10.2024 16:15
π 249
π 83
π¬ 5
π 10
Deleted twitter (finally!), hallo bluesky psych folks π
29.10.2024 23:26
π 11
π 0
π¬ 2
π 0