Perfect headline
www.theguardian.com/australia-ne...
10.10.2025 05:03
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
😂
@johnmichaelw.bsky.social try this, cool huh?
youtu.be/_lOT2p_FCvA?...
When someone corrected me I was completely convinced they were wrong. I still think this qualifies as pedantry though 😂
See the section on the Mandela effect. It's fascinating. This is bullet 3 of "other examples":
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_m...
😶🌫️
I know you love a pedant so have to ask - you know he doesn’t actually say “Luke” in that line right? It’s a classic example of the Mandela effect.
Nice. It’s plum harvest day in WC1 (15kg). Crumbles incoming!
Anyone else thinking Spain have left caldentey on for too long?
I was kind of joking - I do take your point!
“You can’t cause harm by voting” 👀
The previous government had changed Immigration Rules making family reunion for stateless people much harder.
We challenged that in the High Court and won — the court found the changes to be unlawful.
Here's what it means for stateless people & their families 👇
freemovement.org.uk/asylum-aid-w...
(2/2) ...but feeling weirdly guilty - it seemed positively illicit to be benefitting so richly from the depths of Alex's remarkable erudition, passion & industry, scot-free.
So delighted now to be a regular contributor on ko-fi.com/podyssey
This is 100% my favourite podcast, and I listen to a loooot of podcasts: @alexpodyssey.bsky.social.
Greek myths, storytelling, history, culture, music, humanity - & all direct from @sturdyalex.bsky.social's velvety voice!
I've been a devotee from the outset, but ...... (1/2)
Guys I found the opening times. Sense this could be important. @sturdyalex.bsky.social
Was that a case or a burn 🤔
Very important and interesting #trafficking & #ECF / #legalaid judgment from the EW High Court last week: HJK & ors v LAA www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWH... 1/7
7/ Congratulations to ATLEU, @shushinluh.bsky.social & Maria Moodie for their work on these very important cases.
6/ The court also undertakes a meticulous demolition of the LAA’s contention that the CICA application process is “straightforward” [98-109].
5/ “Fairness demands that these Claimants should be able to present their cases for compensation effectively at the first time of applying” [96].
4/ This argument is brutally described in lawyerspeak as a “surprising conclusion” [92] (BrE: obviously wrong).
3/ Particularly short shrift is reserved for the LAA’s submission that ECF was applied for at “a very early stage in the process” [82] -- ie, that it would have been more appropriate to apply for ECF *after* a CICA application had been refused.
2/ tl;dr: the LAA was wrong to refuse ECF to these four trafficking survivors for their CICA application – to do so was a breach of their article 6 ECHR rights.
Very important and interesting #trafficking & #ECF / #legalaid judgment from the EW High Court last week: HJK & ors v LAA www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWH... 1/7
Somehow this cut deep
Oh great - now the universe is screwed too
www.theguardian.com/science/2025...
Suddenly strikes me that In style (of course not in substance) “Oopsie” was quite a DAG comment.
Season 1 is great and worth rewatching. Just such a great premise, with a group of characters who know nothing about each other and an audience gradually knowing more about them than they know about each other thanks to flashbacks. But go no further!
