Why do we elect so many stupid selfish leaders who totally ignore the future of the planet?
Why do we elect so many stupid selfish leaders who totally ignore the future of the planet?
There should always be consequences for ignoring distress calls. He's lucky no one died and he's not up for manslaughter.
The problem is Trump, disrespecting & threatening Canada. Most here have decided to boycott US goods & not vacation there anymore, given the lawlessness of ICE abusing foreigners. Trump ruined a great relationship. Even when he leaves, Canadians won't trust the US, given they voted for a criminal.
There’s no such thing as government funded. It’s all taxpayer funded.
I’ve said it before, but People magazine should get a Pulitzer for its coverage of this administration.
Yes, horrific in-your-face corruption has taken over the USA and so few seem to be doing anything about it.
It's really sick that Americans allow Trump's family to make money off Trump's illegal war and all the dead Americans he is condemning with his lust for money.
Bravo for being diligent with your painting but it would be better if you didn't ignore your discomfort because where you are causing stress on your body will catch up with you.
I'm one who found this out the hard way. Be kind to your body - you only have one.
So far the war on Iran has cost $9.4 billion.
That's $1 billion per day.
$41,666,667 per hour.
$11,574 per second.
Thousands of lives lost.
People don't want this. They want a living wage. They want healthcare. They want to be able to afford a home. They want their basic needs met.
I was being honest and open and you were calling me name (a logical fallacy) and not answering even my questions like what is your religion so I'd know where you are coming from at least.
I did the Falklands War - you don't read what I post - this is a ridiculous conversation. I answer your questions - you don't read them. I ask you my questions - you don't answer, just call me names and say I'm lying when I'm not. I give up - good night!
Like I said before, there can be genocide with NO deaths, like in Canada. It's clear Israel wanted to drive the Palestinians from their homes, why they destroyed so many civilian structures - Zionists must steal their land, push them out. It's really religiously-motivated murderous bullying.
I did - the Falklands war. It was a war between Argentina and Britain over territory. All targets were military, most of the dead were military, only 3 civilian deaths while in Gaza most of the dead are innocent women and children that had NOTHING to do with Hamas that Israel murdered.
The starvation was intentional and it targeted the civilian population because we all know the military has rations and is the first to be fed - so Israel was targeting women and particularly, the most innocent, children with cruel cruel nasty inhumane hunger -That's the pure ugly hate of genocide!
Israel has .012% of its population killed while in Gaza has lost 3% to 4% of Gaza's pre-war population and likely way more.
That's pretty one-sided to me and that is a horrific amount of killing.
Are you OK with mass murder? You never answered that.
I think you really have no idea what you are arguing.
What are you really arguing, tell me.
You think it's great to starve Arab children because you hate them all and want to see them die and that is NOT genocide, right?
This is about non-war genocide too - why it's so broad.
For instance, in Canada we had a genocide against the native people. It wasn't a war but we forced the children to go to residential school far from their families to separate them from their culture. That's cultural genocide.
These are large places. Gaza is very small - so the impact is much much worse.
Please explain why YOU are OK with this horrific mass murder?
Explain.
Explain!!!!!
Why? Why promote killing? Why?
The Falkland Islands War was a conflict lasting "74 days and ended with an Argentine surrender on 14 June, returning the islands to British control. In total, 649 Argentine military personnel, 255 British military personnel and three Falkland Islanders were killed during the hostilities."
You were confusing two different things. The Lancet Summit thing was NOT the same as my article. You clearly are not too educated or you would know the Lancet is a very very very respected journal.
Explain why you think that.
You offered NO proof. You prove nothing.
Here's some explanation of the difference between war and genocide.
Starvation targets mainly civilians, not the military. Zionists are trying to steal land from Arabs so they're targeting a religious population and it's very very one sided.
I read that no small place in the world has ever been bombed as intensely as Gaza. We don't know the real numbers of dead in Israel because they kill journalists and the truth. There isn't much left from the pictures I've seen.
I showed you 3 articles. You showed ZERO.
Here's more
You offered Human Rights Watch as evidence for the Kurds.
www.hrw.org/news/2024/12...
www.amnesty.org/en/latest/ne... win the debate.
I got it from the UN document so it's not a lie but the one offering ZERO evidence will say even the UN is lying, right? You will likely pretend everything is a lie with ZERO evidence to the contrary, which very illogical but then hate is usually about being illogical. Where is YOUR evidence?
The Lancet article has a bibliography has 13 references. Did you show me an article from a reputable journal with 13 references? No!!!! You showed me NO evidence and gave NO reason why you think deliberately starving an innocent civilian population is not genocide. You offer NOTHING!
Quote it and give YOUR evidence. You offer none. You claim I lie but you are the dishonest one, not answering one question. Why don't you answer my questions? You could at least explain that.
Wars have rules. War crimes targeting a group for their ethnicity or religion to destroy them or push them out is genocide. Deliberate starvation of a civilian population is a war crime as is deliberately killing, detaining and tortured medical personnel, targeted medical vehicles and journalists.
No one pays people to care about others but they do pay people like you to promote hate.
Again, you have offered NO proof that forced starvation and massive bombing of a population trapped in a small place is not genocide.
The Lancet is a peer-reviewed medical journal - it doesn't get better than that. Where is all your proof?