You still win the privilege of the glucose challenge test!
10.03.2026 12:39
π 1
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
RETRACTED FOR THE SECOND TIME: phony study on "biofield energy" treatment neurocritic.blogspot.com/2026/03/retr...
An update on the saga of a supernatural intervention published in peer-reviewed scientific journals cc: @retractionwatch.com
05.03.2026 21:33
π 8
π 5
π¬ 0
π 1
@dingdingpeng.the100.ci still a long way to go with causal inference though.
Everyone: I know about the mistakes. Donβt @me.
I already am struggling with 3 phrases about challenges of living abroad which is Hausaufgabe.
02.03.2026 17:49
π 4
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Hahaha, in the abstract? Ok, you win. But seriously one cannot make a 150 words abstract that makes sense
24.02.2026 19:23
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Also curious about the lit searches (genuinely). I never tried anything bespoke but the times I tried with Claude, what it found was subpar. Is there something specific you use? Also true that I avoid giving anything written by me to LLMs, so maybe that might have made searches better
24.02.2026 19:22
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Just here to say abstracts should start at 300 words.
24.02.2026 19:19
π 1
π 0
π¬ 2
π 0
Is this result mechanistically plausible? (I know nothing about this field)
15.02.2026 07:44
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
In short, donβt dichotomize. It just gives the illusion of clarity, while losing information.
15.02.2026 07:10
π 10
π 5
π¬ 0
π 1
Really curious what tenant of modern parenting has made it so that your kid wants you and me to exchange phone numbers to play with my kids, but you are like βoh itβs not necessary, weβll see each other aroundβ. Privacy? Attachment? Sheer insanity?
14.02.2026 19:33
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
The very same people (I have two big names of open science in mind, add their fans) who literally predicted 5-6 years ago that researchers who donβt code will be out of science (haha) are now predicting LLMs will be doing most of the science in 5 years. Cassandra, somethingβs gotta give.
13.02.2026 18:12
π 5
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
New paper, on a worrying trend in meta-science: the practice of anonymising datasets on, e.g., published articles. We argue that this is at odds with norms established in research synthesis, explore arguments for anonymisation, provide counterpoints, and demonstrate implications and epistemic costs.
13.02.2026 16:50
π 98
π 52
π¬ 6
π 7
Yeah itβs the legal status I wish did not matterβ¦sorry I was just extra annoyed at Oster
06.02.2026 16:11
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Can we for the love of God start calling it partnership? Signed the not married in long-term couples
06.02.2026 14:29
π 1
π 0
π¬ 2
π 0
Oh finally. We can like many things about Denmark, and still dislike their vaccination model. We have a more comprehensive schedule in Italy. Thank God.
06.02.2026 12:47
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Mesmerizing. You cannot watch this and remain unmoved.
06.02.2026 12:43
π 3
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
My favorite genre of Epstein emails are powerful people emailing WITH JEFFREY EPSTEIN about how MeToo has gone too far and the woke mob must be stopped.
04.02.2026 02:22
π 19704
π 4217
π¬ 432
π 179
Same for me with German, which I studied in high school and after! Aargh! Can I blame it on having small kids? Yes
04.02.2026 11:29
π 1
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
And modestly I am proud of myself that without any substantial causal inference training (on my list this year along with relearning German, learning French and Gen alphaβ¦for now) I intuitively thought of many of these limitations. And some designs (RCTs) to me should only have robustness analyses
04.02.2026 11:25
π 3
π 1
π¬ 1
π 0
Data sharing psychos= crafting an elaborate data sharing all while knowing full well you wonβt share
04.02.2026 08:21
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Exactly. I think John actually did a study on this. Some just say data sharing: none. Really useful policy
04.02.2026 08:10
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Ahaha what do you mean? Jama journals do not mandate data sharing, they mandate a data sharing βstatementβ. (See what I did there?)
04.02.2026 08:02
π 2
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Did he ever add the other 7 messages or what is it we call tweets here?
03.02.2026 18:06
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Probably competition from MDPI π€£
03.02.2026 08:06
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
But data is available from the authors upon reasonable request. For a meta-research paper this is simply ridiculous
Honestly, read our paper more
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35623542/
02.02.2026 11:48
π 19
π 4
π¬ 3
π 0
TFW you reply to all but it was the wrong all including the person who should not have read the mail. π
02.02.2026 10:08
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Academics vying for a spot in Epsteinβs world. There are so many. I feel the need to make a thread, so I donβt keep confusing them. 1/
31.01.2026 21:02
π 2941
π 1445
π¬ 75
π 222
It absolutely baffles me that in America high-profile professors at the top higher-education institutions (before cuts and anything) would secure funding by literally courting a millionaire sexual predator. How did you declare that funding on submissions again?
01.02.2026 06:59
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0